Cited by 26Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Management and Treatment

Cognitive mechanisms of change in multidisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic widespread pain: a prospective cohort study

Open access
Rooij, A, Boer, M, Leeden, M, Roorda, L, Steultjens, M, Dekker, J·2014·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of improvement in negative emotional cognitions, active cognitive coping, and control and chronicity beliefs to the outcome of multidisciplinary treatment in patients with chronic widespread pain. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 120 subjects diagnosed with chronic widespread pain, who completed a multidisciplinary pain programme. METHODS: Data from baseline, 6 months and 18 months follow-up measurements were analysed. Longitudinal relationships were analysed between changes in cognitions and outcome, using generalized estimated equations. Outcome domains included: pain, interference of pain in daily life, depression, and global perceived effect. Cognitive domains included: negative emotional cognitions, active cognitive coping and control and chronicity beliefs. RESULTS: Improvements in negative emotional cognitions were associated with improvements in all outcome domains, in particular with improvement in interference of pain with daily life and depression (between baseline and 6 months, and 6 and 18 months). Improvements in active cognitive coping were associated with improvements in interference of pain in daily life (between baseline and 6 months). Improvements in control and chronicity beliefs were associated with improvements in pain and depression (between 6 and 18 months). CONCLUSION: Improvement in negative emotional cognitions seems to be a key mechanism of change in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic widespread pain. Improvement in active cognitive coping and improvement in control and chronic timeline beliefs may also constitute mechanisms of change, although the evidence is less strong.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/16501977-1252

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTSD symptoms mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and maltreatment and later-life pain and pain-related limitations.

    “PTSD symptoms have been shown to mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and maltreatment and pain and pain-related limitations later in life 75, 76.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]5. Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisci -plinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 670-678.
  2. [18]18. Moss-Morris R, Humphrey K, Johnson MH, Petrie KJ. Patients' perceptions of their pain condition across a multidisciplinary pain management program: do they change and if so does it matter? Clin J Pain 2007; 23: 558-564.
  3. [38]38. Turk DC A cognitive-behavioral perspective on treatment of chronic pain patients. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rooij, A., Boer, M., Leeden, M., Roorda, L., Steultjens, M., & Dekker, J.
Affiliations
  • Reade (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2014
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
173-180
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140989493
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic widespread pain, multidisciplinary pain management, mechanisms of change, control beliefs, depression, pain interference, global perceived effect, pain catastrophizing
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review