The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ON THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSE DISCUSSIONS
Open accessAbstract
“Social presence,” the degree to which participants in computer-mediated communication feel affectively connected one to another, has been shown to be an important factor in student satisfaction and success in online courses. This mixed methods study built on previous research to explore in greater depth the nature of social presence and how it develops in online course discussions. The study combined quantitative analyses of survey results from students enrolled in four online graduate courses, and qualitative comparisons of students with the highest and lowest perceptions of social presence. Quantitative results revealed significant correlations between perceived social presence and satisfaction with online discussions, and teased apart the respective influences of the perceived presence of instructors and peers. The findings indicate that the perceived presence of instructors may be a more influential factor in determining student satisfaction than the perceived presence of peers. Correlations with other course and learner characteristics suggest that course design may also significantly affect the development of social presence. Qualitative findings support the quantitative results. In addition, they provide evidence that students perceiving the highest social presence also projected themselves more into online discussions,and reveal meaningful differences in perceptions of the usefulness and purpose of online discussion between students perceiving high and low social presence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
(2012) · From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning · doi:10.4135/9781483387765.n6 · Cited by 7,107
The social psychology of telecommunications
Gray, G. R. H. (1977) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/0308-5961(77)90016-7 · Cited by 3,461
Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649709526970 · Cited by 2,005
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885
Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing
Rourke, L., Anderson, T. D., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999) · AUSpace (Athabasca University) · Cited by 1,773
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag · Cited by 1,646
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 · Cited by 1,637
Self-citation
Cited by
Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001 · Cited by 1,653
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001 · Cited by 787
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007 · Cited by 641
Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021 · Cited by 426
Improving online social presence through asynchronous video
Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Swan, K., & Shih, L. F.
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2019-03-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W2924456615
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 27.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSE DISCUSSIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
- The paper
- Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2019). ON THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE COURSE DISCUSSIONS. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.