Cited by 24Dermatological diseases and infestationsYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites researchVector-borne infectious diseases

Efficacy of lufenuron against developmental stages of fleas (Ctenocephalides felis felis) in dogs housed in simulated home environments

Open access
Blagbum, Byron L., Hendrix, Charles M., Vaughan, Joy L., Lindsay, David S., Barnett, Sharron H.·1995·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

Twenty-four, adult, female Beagles were arranged by body weight from greatest to least and allocated to 2 groups of 12 dogs, using random numbers. Dogs were housed collectively in 2 adjacent metal buildings, each divided into 4 rooms measuring 2.1 × 3.7 m. Each room was paneled and carpeted and had an access door to the outside with a connecting run that measured 2.1 × 9.1 m. Each run had a surface consisting of 5 cm of pea gravel overlaying 5 cm of sand, and was partially covered by an awning that provided shade at its proximal end. For placement in room/run units, dogs in each of the treated and control groups were allotted to 4 subgroups of 3 dogs each. Each subgroup of dogs was placed in a separate room/run unit. Units containing treatment or control subgroups were alternated to avoid placing identically treated subgroups adjacent to each other. Dogs of subgroups A, C, E, and G were treated with lufenuron monthly at a minimal target dosage of 10 mg/kg of body weight; those of subgroups B, D, F, and H were treated with excipient tablets. Dogs were treated on study days 7, 37, 68, and 98. Each dog was infested with 100 newly emerged, unfed, insectary-reared, adult Ctenocephalides felts on each of study days 0 and 2. Thereafter, infestations on all dogs were dependent on continued development of fleas either in the indoor or outdoor environment. Numbers of fleas on each of the treated and control dogs were determined, using a nondestructive counting technique on days 6, 14, 21, 28, 35, 56, 70, 84, 98, 112, and 119. On study day 21 and on each collection day thereafter, numbers of adult fleas recovered from treated dogs were significantly (P < 0.05) fewer than those recovered from control dogs. Proportion reduction of fleas on treated vs control dogs exceeded 90% by study day 35 and 95% by study day 56. Efficacies exceeded 95% on all remaining study days except days 98 (94.4%) and 119 (90%). Results of this study indicate that control of flea populations can be achieved in treated dogs approximately 4 to 5 weeks after initial treatment with lufenuron, and that continued monthly treatments will maintain effective control of flea infestations. Adverse reactions or side effects to treatment with lufenuron were not observed in dogs after treatment at any time throughout the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1995.56.04.464

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lufenuron is highly effective when used alone in simulated home environments with induced flea infestations.

    “Lufenuron proved to be highly effective when used alone in simulated home environments with induced flea infestations [129-131]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dryden MW. Biology of fleas of dogs and cats . Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1993 ; 15 (4) :569-579 .
  2. Zakson M , Hink WF , MacKichan JJ . Fate of the benzoyl- phenyl urea CGA-184699 in the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis . Pestic Sci 1992 ; 35:117-123 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blagbum, B. L., Hendrix, C. M., Vaughan, J. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Barnett, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • From the Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849-5519 (Blagbum Hendrix, Vaughan, Lindsay), and CIBA Animal Health, Greensboro, NC 27419 (Barnett).
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1995-04-01
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
464-467
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413245974
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
lufenuron, flea control, Ctenocephalides felis felis, dog flea, flea life cycle, flea infestation
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzamides, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Female, Siphonaptera, Fluorocarbons, Housing, Animal, Insecticides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review