Cited by 13Dermatological diseases and infestationsHelminth infection and controlYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research

Use of injectable lufenuron for treatment of infestations of Ctenocephalides felis in cats

Open access
Franc, Michel, Cadiergues, Marie-Christine·1997·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether and for how long a single dose of a new injectable formulation of lufenuron would successfully control experimentally induced Ctenocephalides felis infestations in cats. Animals: 15 cats (3 groups of 5). Procedure: Each group of cats was housed in a separate room. Each cat was infested with 150 fleas, and flea counts were checked weekly. Once flea populations had stabilized, cats were treated with lufenuron at a dosage of 5 mg/kg of body weight, SC (group 1) or 10 mg/kg, SC (group 2). Group-3 cats were not treated. Flea counts were checked weekly for 18 weeks, and effectiveness was determined by comparing flea counts for treated cats with flea counts for control cats. Cats were reinfested with fleas during weeks 19, 26, 36, and 49, and flea counts were again determined weekly. Results: Effectiveness for both dosages of lufenuron was > 90% by 5 weeks after treatment, > 95% by 9 weeks after treatment, and > 98% by 13 weeks after treatment. Reinfestations performed during weeks 19 and 26 were well controlled (ie, > 90% reduction in flea counts, compared with control group) in both groups of cats treated with lufenuron. Reinfestations performed during week 36 were well controlled only in cats treated with lufenuron at the higher dosage. Reinfestations performed during week 49 were not controlled in either group of treated cats. Conclusions: A single dose of the new injectable formulation of lufenuron should control flea populations in cats for up to 26 weeks, even among cats that are periodically reinfested with fleas. (Am J Vet Res 1997;58:140–142)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1997.58.02.140

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lufenuron is highly effective when used alone in simulated home environments with induced flea infestations.

    “Lufenuron proved to be highly effective when used alone in simulated home environments with induced flea infestations [129-131]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franc, M., & Cadiergues, M.-C.
Affiliations
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (FR)
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
140-142
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2399337448
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Keywords
lufenuron, Ctenocephalides felis, fleas, injectable formulation, flea control, reinfestation, dose comparison, cats
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzamides, Cat Diseases, Cats, Diptera, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Female, Siphonaptera, Fluorocarbons, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insecticides, Male, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review