Cited by 471Viral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthHealth and Conflict Studies

Psychosocial effects of an Ebola outbreak at individual, community and international levels

Open access
Van Bortel, Tine, Basnayake, Anoma, Wurie, Fatou, Jambai, Musu, Koroma, Alimamy Sultan, Muana, Andrew T, Hann, Katrina, Eaton, Julian +2 more·2016·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

The 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone was the worst in history with over 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths. Here we examine the psychosocial consequences of the epidemic. Ebola is a traumatic illness both in terms of symptom severity and mortality rates. Those affected are likely to experience psychological effects due to the traumatic course of the infection, fear of death and experience of witnessing others dying. Survivors can also experience psychosocial consequences due to feelings of shame or guilt (e.g. from transmitting infection to others) and stigmatization or blame from their communities. At the community level, a cyclical pattern of fear occurs, with a loss of trust in health services and stigma, resulting in disruptions of community interactions and community break down. Health systems in affected countries were severely disrupted and overstretched by the outbreak and their capacities were significantly reduced as almost 900 health-care workers were infected with Ebola and more than 500 died. The outbreak resulted in an increased need for health services, reduced quality of life and economic productivity and social system break down. It is essential that the global response to the outbreak considers both acute and long-term psychosocial needs of individuals and communities. Response efforts should involve communities to address psychosocial need, to rebuild health systems and trust and to limit stigma. The severity of this epidemic and its long-lasting repercussions should spur investment in and development of health systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.15.158543

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005): report of the Review Committee on the functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to pandemic (H1N1). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Bortel, T., Basnayake, A., Wurie, F., Jambai, M., Koroma, A. S., Muana, A. T., Hann, K., Eaton, J., Martin, S., & Nellums, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Box 113, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, England.
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • United Nations (US)
  • Canada Grand Challenges Project, ADDO/Caritas Freetown, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  • Social Mobilization Action Consortium, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  • Ministry of Health and Sanitation (SL)
  • International Organization for Migration, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  • CBM International, Lomé, Togo.
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
210-214
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331050192
Cited by
471
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
Ebola outbreak, 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic, psychosocial impact, psychological trauma, stigma, guilt and shame, healthcare worker infection, health system disruption, social breakdown, economic productivity loss, community participation
MeSH terms
Africa, Western, Health Personnel, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Survivors, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, Ebolavirus, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review