PreprintCited by 1,000Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Energy-based Generative Adversarial Network

Open access
Zhao, Junbo, Mathieu, Michael, LeCun, Yann·2016·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce the "Energy-based Generative Adversarial Network" model (EBGAN) which views the discriminator as an energy function that attributes low energies to the regions near the data manifold and higher energies to other regions. Similar to the probabilistic GANs, a generator is seen as being trained to produce contrastive samples with minimal energies, while the discriminator is trained to assign high energies to these generated samples. Viewing the discriminator as an energy function allows to use a wide variety of architectures and loss functionals in addition to the usual binary classifier with logistic output. Among them, we show one instantiation of EBGAN framework as using an auto-encoder architecture, with the energy being the reconstruction error, in place of the discriminator. We show that this form of EBGAN exhibits more stable behavior than regular GANs during training. We also show that a single-scale architecture can be trained to generate high-resolution images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1609.03126

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Image warping and morphing are two approaches that can be used to accomplish entire face synthesis.

    “Image warping and morphing are two approaches that can be used to accomplish this goal (Zhao etal. 2016; Berthouzoz etal. 2011; Xu etal. 2022).”

    From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Zhao et al. 2016

    Section 4.3 (p. 7) reports generating images from the CelebA face dataset using an energy-based generative adversarial network. It does not address whether image warping or morphing can accomplish face synthesis; searches for both techniques found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carreira-Perpinan, Miguel A and Hinton, Geoffrey. On contrastive divergence learning. In AISTATS , volume 10, pp. 33-40. Citeseer, 2005.
  2. Goodfellow, Ian, Pouget-Abadie, Jean, Mirza, Mehdi, Xu, Bing, Warde-Farley, David, Ozair, Sherjil, Courville, Aaron, and Bengio, Yoshua. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 2672-2680, 2014.
  3. Kavukcuoglu, Koray, Sermanet, Pierre, Boureau, Y-Lan, Gregor, Karol, Mathieu, Micha¨ el, and Cun, Yann L. Learning convolutional feature hierarchies for visual recognition. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 1090-1098, 2010.
  4. Ranzato, Marc'Aurelio, Boureau, Y-Lan, Chopra, Sumit, and LeCun, Yann. A unified energy-based framework for unsupervised learning. In Proc. Conference on AI and Statistics (AI-Stats) , 2007.
  5. Rifai, Salah, Vincent, Pascal, Muller, Xavier, Glorot, Xavier, and Bengio, Yoshua. Contractive auto-encoders: Explicit invariance during feature extraction. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11) , pp. 833-840, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Mathieu, M., & LeCun, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521028896
Cited by
912
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 160 · 2018: 180 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, data manifold, reconstruction error, training stability, high-resolution image generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review