Cited by 48Gaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionEmotion and Mood Recognition

Human Gaze Assisted Artificial Intelligence: A Review

Open access
Zhang, Ruohan, Saran, Akanksha, Liu, Bo, Zhu, Yifeng, Guo, Sihang, Niekum, Scott, Ballard, Dana, Hayhoe, Mary·2020·Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Human gaze reveals a wealth of information about internal cognitive state. Thus, gaze-related research has significantly increased in computer vision, natural language processing, decision learning, and robotics in recent years. We provide a high-level overview of the research efforts in these fields, including collecting human gaze data sets, modeling gaze behaviors, and utilizing gaze information in various applications, with the goal of enhancing communication between these research areas. We discuss future challenges and potential applications that work towards a common goal of human-centered artificial intelligence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2020/689

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [3]3. Henny Admoni, Anca Dragan, Siddhartha S Srinivasa, and Brian Scassellati. Deliberate delays during robot- to-human handovers improve compliance with gaze communica- tion. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international con- ference on Human-robot interaction, pages 49-56, 2014.
  2. [11]11. Sean Andrist, Michael Gleicher, and Bilge Mutlu. Looking coordinated: Bidirectional gaze mechanisms for collaborative interaction with virtual characters. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing sys- tems, pages 2571-2582, 2017.
  3. [32]32. Cornia et al., 2018a] Marcella Cornia, Lorenzo Baraldi, Giuseppe Serra, and Rita Cucchiara. Paying more attention to saliency: Im- age captioning with saliency and context attention. ACM Trans- actions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Appli- cations (TOMM), 14(2):1-21, 2018.
  4. [33]33. Cornia et al., 2018b] Marcella Cornia, Lorenzo Baraldi, Giuseppe Serra, and Rita Cucchiara. Predicting human eye fixations via an lstm-based saliency attentive model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(10):5142-5154, 2018.
  5. [68]68. Kyle Krafka, Aditya Khosla, Petr Kellnhofer, Harini Kannan, Suchendra Bhandarkar, Wojciech Matusik, and Antonio Torralba. Eye tracking for everyone. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2176-2184, 2016.
  6. [82]82. Moon et al., 2014] AJung Moon, Daniel M Troniak, Brian Glee- son, Matthew KXJ Pan, Minhua Zheng, Benjamin A Blumer, Karon MacLean, and Elizabeth A Croft. Meet me where i'm gazing: how shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international con- ference on Human-robot interaction, pages 334-341, 2014.
  7. [90]90. Papoutsaki et al., 2016] Alexandra Papoutsaki, Patsorn Sangkloy, James Laskey, Nediyana Daskalova, Jeff Huang, and James Hays. Webgazer: Scalable webcam eye tracking using user in- teractions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence-IJCAI 2016, 2016.
  8. [101]101. Adria Recasens, Aditya Khosla, Carl Von- drick, and Antonio Torralba. Where are they looking? In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 199- 207, 2015.
  9. [103]103. Adria Recasens, Carl Vondrick, Aditya Khosla, and Antonio Torralba. Following gaze in video. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 1435-1443, 2017.
  10. [107]107. Viktor Richter, Birte Carlmeyer, Florian Lier, Sebastian Meyer zu Borgsen, David Schlangen, Franz Kummert, Sven Wachsmuth, and Britta Wrede. Are you talking to me? im- proving the robustness of dialogue systems in a multi party hri scenario by incorporating gaze direction and lip movement of at- tendees. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pages 43-50, 2016.
  11. [133]133. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Par- mar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Ad- vances in neural information processing systems, pages 5998- 6008, 2017.
  12. [141]141. Yanyu Xu, Yanbing Dong, Junru Wu, Zhengzhong Sun, Zhiru Shi, Jingyi Yu, and Shenghua Gao. Gaze prediction in dynamic 360 immersive videos. In proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5333-5342, 2018.
  13. [153]153. Zhang et al., 2018b] Ziheng Zhang, Yanyu Xu, Jingyi Yu, and Shenghua Gao. Saliency detection in 360 videos. In Proceed- ings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 488-503, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, R., Saran, A., Liu, B., Zhu, Y., Guo, S., Niekum, S., Ballard, D., & Hayhoe, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Ruohan
Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-07
Volume
2020
Pages
4951-4958
OpenAlex
W3041498386
Cited by
48
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7
FWCI
5.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1617639, 1749204, 1638107, 1724157)
  • University of Texas at Austin (N00014-18-2243)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-18-2243, N00014)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY005729)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
human gaze, gaze-based interaction, human-centered AI, cognitive states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review