The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and Responsiveness of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale in Patients With Anterior Knee Pain
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective methodological study of repeated measures using a sample of consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in patients with anterior knee pain. BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain is one of the most common orthopedic complaints affecting the knee. Yet there is currently no self-report outcome measure that has well-established reliability and responsiveness, specifically for this population. As a result, clinicians and researchers may be making inappropriate conclusions regarding patient outcomes by using questionnaires that are misleading. METHODS AND MEASURES: This multisite study involved 30 patients from 4 outpatient physical therapy clinics in Dallas, TX (24 women, 6 men; age range, 16-50 years; mean+/-SD age, 35.2+/-9.1 years). Patients receiving physical therapy for a chief complaint of anterior knee pain completed the AKPS and LEFS at their initial appointment and again 2 to 3 days later. Upon completion of physical therapy, the patients completed the AKPS, LEFS, and a global rating of change form. The treating therapist also completed a global rating of change form at the patient's final visit. The mean of the patient's and therapist's global rating of change was used as the criterion measure of change. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was high for both questionnaires (ICC2,1 = 0.95 for the AKPS and 0.98 for the LEFS). A significant correlation was found between the criterion measure of change and both questionnaires. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that both questionnaires were moderately responsive with the area under the curve slightly higher for the LEFS (0.77) than the AKPS (0.69). CONCLUSION: The LEFS and the AKPS both demonstrated high test-retest reliability and appear to be moderately responsive to clinical change in patients with anterior knee pain. Reliability and responsiveness were slightly higher in the LEFS than the AKPS. Further research is needed to determine if these measures could be modified, or new measures created, to produce an even more sensitive tool for this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice,
(2002) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00362-4 · Cited by 9,489
Scoring of patellofemoral disorders
Kujala, U. M., Jaakkola, L. H., Koskinen, S. K., Taimela, S., Hurme, M., & Nelimarkka, O. (1993) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80366-4 · Cited by 1,439
Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Lott, S., & Riddle, D. L. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 1,435
Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P., & Patrick, D. L. (1991) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80019-4 · Cited by 1,364
Measuring the whole or the parts?
Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Wright, J. G., Tarasuk, V., & Bombardier, C. (2001) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80043-0 · Cited by 1,306
Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v · Cited by 932
A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index
Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(86)80060-0 · Cited by 508
Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change Scores
Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J. M., & Riddle, D. L. (1996) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109 · Cited by 433
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement Properties in Patients With Knee Dysfunction
Chatman, A. B., Hyams, S. P., Neel, J. M., Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Schomberg, A., & Stabler, M. (1997) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/77.8.820 · Cited by 322
Assessing Change Over Time in Patients With Low Back Pain
Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J., Solomon, P., Gill, C., & Finch, E. (1994) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/74.6.528 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design
Kamper, S. J., Maher, C. G., & Mackay, G. (2009) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163 · Cited by 1,458
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.025 · Cited by 386
Collins, N., Crossley, K., Beller, E., Darnell, R., McPoil, T., & Vicenzino, B. (2009) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1735 · Cited by 280
Utility of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle in Females With Patellofemoral Pain
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2706 · Cited by 251
Barton, C. J., Webster, K. E., & Menz, H. B. (2008) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2861 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, C. J., Propps, M., Ratner, J., Zeigler, D. L., Horton, P., & Smith, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 136-146
- ISSN
- 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1344
- OpenAlex
- W2063910976
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and Responsiveness of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale in Patients With Anterior Knee Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.3.136
- The paper
- Watson, C. J., Propps, M., Ratner, J., Zeigler, D. L., Horton, P., & Smith, S. S. (2005). Reliability and Responsiveness of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale in Patients With Anterior Knee Pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.3.136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.