Cited by 260Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and Health

The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep1

Chen, X. B., Chen, Y. K., Franklin, M. F., Ørskov, E. R., Shand, W. J.·1992·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Urinary excretion of purine derivatives (PD) was used to estimate the microbial N (MN) supply to sheep in three experiments designed to examine the effects of DMI and BW on the efficiency of microbial N supply (EMNS) to the host animal. In Exp. 1, four sheep of about 45 kg BW were given 328, 656, 984, and 1313 g of DM/d of a hay/concentrate diet in a Latin square design. Excretion of PD per kilogram of digestible organic matter intake (DOMI) increased with intake, and EMNS increased from 12.0 to 28.3 g of MN/kg of OM digested in the rumen (DOMR). In Exp. 2, 19 sheep ranging from 22 to 73 kg BW were all offered 820 g of DM/d of the same diet as that fed in Exp. 1. Although DM digestibility was relatively constant, PD excretion varied from 4.5 to 13.5 mmol/d and EMNS from 8 to 36 g of MN/kg of DOMR, both inversely related to animal BW. In Exp. 3, five sheep of 48 to 57 kg BW were given a different diet at 702, 966, or 1,237 g of DM/d. Purine derivative excretion per kilogram of DOMI increased with the DMI:BW ratio. Calculated EMNS ranged from 23 to 35 g of MN/kg of DOMR. Pooled data from all experiments showed EMNS to be related to the DMI:BW ratio. It is suggested that the DMI:BW ratio defines the ruminal digesta passage rate and hence outflow of microbial protein. The results imply that the EMNS for a given diet is not constant, but changes with intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/1992.7051534x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X. B., Chen, Y. K., Franklin, M. F., Ørskov, E. R., & Shand, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1992-05-01
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1534-1542
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W274450734
Cited by
260
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Animal Nutrition and Health
Keywords
purine derivatives, microbial protein supply, sheep, dry matter intake, body weight, urinary excretion, rumen nitrogen
MeSH terms
Allantoin, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Body Weight, Digestion, Eating, Female, Hypoxanthines, Male, Purines, Rumen, Sheep, Uric Acid, Xanthines, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review