The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methane emissions from cattle
Abstract
Increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane have led scientists to examine its sources of origin. Ruminant livestock can produce 250 to 500 L of methane per day. This level of production results in estimates of the contribution by cattle to global warming that may occur in the next 50 to 100 yr to be a little less than 2%. Many factors influence methane emissions from cattle and include the following: level of feed intake, type of carbohydrate in the diet, feed processing, addition of lipids or ionophores to the diet, and alterations in the ruminal microflora. Manipulation of these factors can reduce methane emissions from cattle. Many techniques exist to quantify methane emissions from individual or groups of animals. Enclosure techniques are precise but require trained animals and may limit animal movement. Isotopic and nonisotopic tracer techniques may also be used effectively. Prediction equations based on fermentation balance or feed characteristics have been used to estimate methane production. These equations are useful, but the assumptions and conditions that must be met for each equation limit their ability to accurately predict methane production. Methane production from groups of animals can be measured by mass balance, micrometeorological, or tracer methods. These techniques can measure methane emissions from animals in either indoor or outdoor enclosures. Use of these techniques and knowledge of the factors that impact methane production can result in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce methane losses by cattle. Implementation of these strategies should result in enhanced animal productivity and decreased contributions by cattle to the atmospheric methane budget.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Production of CH4 also deprives the host animal of carbon resources and results in loss of energy (13.3 Mcal/kg CH4), leading to poor feed efficiency (9).”
From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane
Cicerone, R. J., & Oremland, R. S. (1988) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/gb002i004p00299 · Cited by 1,586
Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere
(1991) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/bf00024600 · Cited by 1,220
Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants
Blaxter, K. L., & Clapperton, J. L. (1965) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19650046 · Cited by 944
Energy metabolism in animals and man
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5756 · Cited by 776
Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)
Czerkawski, J. W., & Breckenridge, G. (1977) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19770102 · Cited by 572
Johnson, K., Huyler, M. T., Westberg, H. H., Lamb, B., & Zimmerman, P. (1994) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00051a025 · Cited by 532
A Theoretical Rumen Fermentation Balance
Wolin, M. J. (1960) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(60)90348-9 · Cited by 480
An Introduction to Rumen Studies
(1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-00551-0 · Cited by 452
Methane Production in Dairy Cows
Moe, P. W., & Tyrrell, H. F. (1979) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83465-7 · Cited by 425
McLean, J. A., & Tobin, G. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663161 · Cited by 396
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Soybean hulls as a primary ingredient in forage-free diets for limit-fed growing cattle.
Loest, C. A., Titgemeyer, E. C., Drouillard, J. S., Blasi, D. A., & Bindel, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2001.793766x · Cited by 44
Shadpour, S., Chud, T. C. S., Hailemariam, D., Plastow, G. S., de Oliveira, H. R., Stothard, P., Lassen, J., Miglior, F., Baes, C. F., Tulpan, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2021-21176 · Cited by 43
Sustainable Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Small Ruminants Farming
Giamouri, E., Zisis, F., Mitsiopoulou, C., Christodoulou, C., Pappas, A. C., Simitzis, P., Kamilaris, C., Galliou, F., Manios, T., Mavrommatis, A., et al. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15054118 · Cited by 50
Potential use of garlic products in ruminant feeding: A review
Ding, H., Ao, C., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2023.04.011 · Cited by 49
Inconsistencies in rumen methane production—effects of forage composition and animal genotype
Waghorn, G. C., Woodward, S. L., Tavendale, M. H., & Clark, D. A. (2006) · International Congress Series · doi:10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.004 · Cited by 43
Sar, C., Mwenya, B., Pen, B., Takaura, K., Morikawa, R., Tsujimoto, A., Kuwaki, K., Isogai, N., Shinzato, I., Asakura, Y., et al. (2005) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20051517 · Cited by 43
“CH4 is also a major end product of ruminal fermentation and represents the loss of 2–12 % of the gross energy consumed by ruminants (Johnson & Johnson, 1995).”
Effects of genetic line and feeding system on methane emissions from dairy systems
Bell, M., Wall, E., Simm, G., & Russell, G. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.049 · Cited by 43
“A faster passage rate due to a higher feed intake level as a result of a higher rate of fermentation, both reduce the rumen retention time of substrate and reduce methane production (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Ulyatt et al., 1997; Tamminga et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFumaric acid supplements have no effect on methane emissions per unit of feed intake in wether lambs
Molano, G., Knight, T. W., & Clark, H. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07280 · Cited by 43
“Measuring CH4 emissions Individual CH4 emissions were estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
MethodVyas, D., McGeough, E. J. J., Mohammed, R., McGinn, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2014) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731114001657 · Cited by 43
Prediction of enteric methane emissions from Holstein dairy cows fed various forage sources
Rico, D. E., Chouinard, P. Y., Hassanat, F., Benchaar, C., & Gervais, R. (2015) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731115001949 · Cited by 45
“…ionophores, all of which can potentially affect the predominant† E-mail: rachel.gervais@fsaa.ulaval.ca Animal (2016), 10:2, pp 203–211 © The Animal Consortium 2015 doi:10.1017/S1751731115001949 animal ruminal microbial population (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Sauer et al., 1998; Weimer et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialElghandour, M. M. M. Y., KHOLIF, A. E., Salem, A. Z. M., OCA, R. M. D., Barbabosa, A., Berasain, M. D. M., & Olafadehan, O. A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.081 · Cited by 43
“Besides, enteric CH4 from ruminants as a result of ruminal fermentation of feed in the rumen implies a loss of digested energy (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) depending on diet degradability and chemical composition (Hristov et al.”
BackgroundKaewpila, C., & Sommart, K. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2500 · Cited by 42
“Ym values at the farm level show extremely high variability (Johnson & Johnson, 1995; Lassey, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialTithonia diversifolia as a Supplementary Feed for Dairy Cows
Ribeiro, R. S., Terry, S. A., Sacramento, J. P., Silveira, S. R. E., Bento, C. B. P., da Silva, E. F., Mantovani, H. C., da Gama, M. A. S., Pereira, L. G. R., Tomich, T. R., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165751 · Cited by 48
Dini, Y. I. F., Gere, J. I., Cajarville, C., & Ciganda, V. (2017) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an16803 · Cited by 43
Abecia, L., Martínez, G., Waddams, K. E., Martín-García, A. I., Pinloche, E., Creevey, C. J., Denman, S. E., Newbold, C. J., & Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02227 · Cited by 48
“The release of methane (CH4) results in a loss of dietary energy (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) and once released into the environment, CH4 acts as a potent greenhouse gas, with a much greater effect on climate change than that of carbon dioxide (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006).”
BackgroundThe Role of Chitosan as a Possible Agent for Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants
Jiménez‐Ocampo, R., Valencia-Salazar, S. S., Pinzón-Díaz, C. E., Herrera-Torres, E., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., Arango, J., & Kú-Vera, J. C. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9110942 · Cited by 43
“Dietary manipulation is of relevance because the diet of animals has a great influence on the production of methane [3,10,18]; therefore, in the last decade, more intensive research on natural compounds for livestock has increased with the objective of reducing rumen CH4 without affecting rumen fermentation and energy…”
BackgroundIslam, M., Kim, S., Ramos, S., Mamuad, L. L., Son, A.-R., Yu, Z., Lee, S.-S., Cho, Y.-I., & Lee, S.-S. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.601061 · Cited by 45
“CH4 is not only a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) but also represents a gross energy loss (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Appuhamy et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSun, X., Wang, Y., Ma, X., Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.955846 · Cited by 49
“Methane production from ruminal anaerobic fermentation contributes to a 2–12% loss of the ingested gross energy (102) and greenhouse gas emissions (103).”
BackgroundEnteric methane production from beef cattle that vary in feed efficiency123
Freetly, H. C., & Brown-Brandl, T. M. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4781 · Cited by 42
Diet effects on methane production by goats and a comparison between measurement methodologies
Bhatta, R., Enishi, O., TAKUSARI, N., HIGUCHI, K., Nonaka, I., & KURIHARA, M. (2008) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859608007983 · Cited by 42
“Roughage-based diets favour acetate production and increase CH4 production per unit of fermentable OM (Johnson & Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialSTEWART, A. A., LITTLE, S. M., OMINSKI, K. H., WITTENBERG, K. M., & JANZEN, H. H. (2009) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859609008764 · Cited by 42
“Slower passage rates reduce DMI, resulting in less fermentable substrate in the rumen, and therefore increase CH4 production (Johnson & Johnson 1995; McAllister et al. 1996).”
BackgroundAnele, U. Y., Yang, W., McGinn, P. J., Tibbetts, S. M., & McAllister, T. A. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2015-0141 · Cited by 42
“Biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids constitutes an alternative pathway for hydrogen disposal, thereby reducing the amount of hydrogen available for CH4 production (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEbert, P. J., Bailey, E., Shreck, A. L., Jennings, J. S., & Cole, N. A. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016.0341 · Cited by 60
Bougouin, A., Ferlay, A., Doreau, M., & Martin, C. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-14041 · Cited by 42
Martínez-Fernández, G., Abecia, L., Martín-García, A. I., Ramos-Morales, E., Hervás, G., Molina-Alcaide, E., & Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R. (2013) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113001699 · Cited by 41
“…(2013), 7:12, pp 1925–1934 © The Animal Consortium 2013 doi:10.1017/S1751731113001699 animal In addition, methane production in the rumen may account for as much as 12% of the gross energy intake in ruminant animals (Johnson and Johnson, 1995), thus representing an energy loss for the animal.”
BackgroundInfluentialPuchała, R., Animut, G. M., Patra, A. K., Detweiler, G. D., Wells, J. E., Varel, V. H., Sahlu, T., & Goetsch, A. L. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4879 · Cited by 41
“Methane emission by ruminant livestock is between 2% and 11% of GE intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995), although greater upper levels, such as 13%, have been cited (Chaves et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInvestigation of a new acetogen isolated from an enrichment of the tammar wallaby forestomach
Gagen, E. J., Wang, J., Padmanabha, J., Liu, J., de Carvalho, I. P. C., Liu, J., Webb, R. I., Jassim, R. A. M. A., Morrison, M., Denman, S. E., et al. (2014) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0314-3 · Cited by 42
“methanogenic archaea use hydrogen to reduce carbon dioxide or methylated compounds to methane, contributing to global methane emissions and representing a loss of between 2 and 12% ingested feed energy for the ruminant [3].”
BackgroundNutritional and host effects on methanogenesis in the grazing ruminant
Clark, H. (2012) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731112001875 · Cited by 41
“A particular issue for the New Zealand work is that the method used to estimate CH4 emissions was the SF6 tracer technique (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
MethodEffect of dietary fat supplementation on methane emissions from dairy cows fed wheat or corn
Alvarez-Hess, P. S., Williams, S. R. O., Jacobs, J. L., Hannah, M. C., Beauchemin, K. A., Eckard, R., Wales, W. J., Morris, G. L., & Moate, P. J. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-14721 · Cited by 41
“Diets with more NDF content are associated with increased methane production, because acetate is a major end product of the fermentation of NDF and acetate enhances methane formation (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundDevelopment of mathematical models to predict enteric methane emission by cattle in Latin America
Benaouda, M., González-Ronquillo, M., Appuhamy, J. A. D. R. N., Kebreab, E., Molina, L. T., Herrera-Camacho, J., Kú-Vera, J. C., Ángeles-Hernández, J. C., & Castelán-Ortega, O. A. (2020) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104177 · Cited by 41
Current Perspectives on Achieving Pronounced Enteric Methane Mitigation From Ruminant Production
Ungerfeld, E. M., Beauchemin, K. A., & Muñoz, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2021.795200 · Cited by 47
“It is true that diets with less concentrates are more methanogenic (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Janssen, 2010), but potent inhibitors of methanogenesis can override the diet effect and cause a strong inhibition in enteric CH4 even with high roughage diets (McCrabb et al., 1997; Martinez-Fernandez et…”
BackgroundSmith, D. J., Helmy, M., Lindley, N. D., & Selvarajoo, K. (2022) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.015 · Cited by 45
Gregorini, P., Beukes, P. C., Waghorn, G. C., Pacheco, D., & Hanigan, M. D. (2015) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.042 · Cited by 41
López, M. C., Estellés, F., Moya, V. J., & Fernández, C. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8424 · Cited by 41
Effects of capric acid on rumen methanogenesis and biohydrogenation of linoleic and α-linolenic acid
Goel, G., Segerkvist, K. A., Vlaeminck, B., Bruggeman, G., Deschepper, K., & Fievez, V. (2009) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109004352 · Cited by 41
“Therefore, decreasing methane production is desirable for reducing the greenhouse gas emission with improved efficiency of digested energy utilisation (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundEnteric methane research and mitigation strategies for pastoral-based beef cattle production systems
Smith, P. E., Kelly, A. K., Kenny, D. A., & Waters, S. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.958340 · Cited by 53
“Therefore, while propionate is a more energy-dense ruminal VFA in comparison to acetate (C2 vs. C3), the lack of a substantial benefit to animal performance may be explained by the negative effect 3-NOP has on DMI and the negligent effect on GEI, which likely counteracts any potential major gains to animal productivit…”
BackgroundInfluentialMeta-analysis of the relationship between dietary condensed tannins and methane emissions by cattle
Berça, A. S., Tedeschi, L. O., Cardoso, A. D. S., & Reis, R. A. (2023) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115564 · Cited by 45
Lillis, L. L., Boots, B., Kenny, D. A., Petrie, K., Boland, T. M., CLIPSON, N. J. W., & Doyle, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05154.x · Cited by 40
“Increased digestibility has been reported to lower methane emissions through higher proportions of easily degradable carbon compounds (Johnson and Johnson 1995; Ellis et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethane emissions from a dairy feedlot during the fall and winter seasons in Northern China
Gao, Z., Yuan, H., Ma, W., Liu, X., & Desjardins, R. L. (2011) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.003 · Cited by 40
“It demonstrated that corn silage used on our experimental farm will likely favor the CH4 production due to the larger acetate production and the use of higher concentrates/grains or highly digestible fiber sources such as beetpulp might be useful to reduce CH4 emission intensity on milk production basis in China (John…”
BackgroundHolistic Management: Misinformation on the Science of Grazed Ecosystems
Carter, J., Jones, A., O’Brien, M. H., Ratner, J., & Wuerthner, G. (2014) · International Journal of Biodiversity · doi:10.1155/2014/163431 · Cited by 40
“Lower amounts of greenhouse gas emissions due to livestock may be estimated by using narrower definitions of livestock-related emissions that include feed based emissions only and exclude externalities [89].”
Danielsson, R., Omazic, A., Ramin, M., Schnürer, A., Griinari, M., Dicksved, J., & Bertilsson, J. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2014-7929 · Cited by 44
Anele, U. Y., Südekum, K., Hummel, J., Arigbede, O. M., Oni, A. O., Olanite, J. A., Böttger, C., Ojo, V. O. A., & Jolaosho, A. O. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.005 · Cited by 40
Livestock as Sources of Greenhouse Gases and Its Significance to Climate Change
Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Malik, P. K., Bagath, M., Al-Hosni, Y. A. S., Sullivan, M. L., & Gaughan, J. B. (2016) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/62135 · Cited by 40
“Isotopic tracer techniques generally require simple experimental designs and relatively straightforward calculations [31].”
Lakhani, N., Kamra, D. N., Lakhani, P., & Alhussien, M. N. (2018) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-018-1727-z · Cited by 40
“The use of chemical compounds as feed additives for defaunation (Van Nevel and Demeyer 1996), supplementation of unsaturated fatty acids (Johnson and Johnson 1995), ionophores, microbial feed additives and prebiotics (Mutsvangwa et al. 1992), etc. have been tried to make livestock more feed…”
BackgroundVerma, S., Taube, F., & Malisch, C. S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052743 · Cited by 44
“Feed constituents such as carbohydrates, proteins, and other organic polymers are degraded to their monomer components in the presence of rumen microbes under anaerobic conditions [7,79,80].”
BackgroundCezimbra, I. M., Nunes, P. A. D. A., Filho, W. D. S., Tischler, M. R., Genro, T. C. M., Bayer, C., Savian, J. V., Bonnet, O. J. F., Soussana, J., & Carvalho, P. C. D. F. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146582 · Cited by 42
Ahmed, E., Fukuma, N. M., Hanada, M., & Nishida, T. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11041029 · Cited by 44
“The CH4 released from enteric fermentation through eructation represents a loss of up to 15% of their gross energy intake, thus being one of the most important inefficiencies in ruminant production systems in addition to its environmental impact, since CH4 is 28 times more powerful than CO2 at trapping the sun’s heat…”
BackgroundContemporary Methods of Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants
Bekele, W., Guinguina, A., Zegeye, A., Simachew, A., & Ramin, M. (2022) · Methane · doi:10.3390/methane1020008 · Cited by 40
Relationship between residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle
Mercadante, M. E. Z., Caliman, A. P. M., Canesin, R. C., Bonilha, S. F. M., Berndt, A., Frighetto, R. T. S., Magnani, E., & Branco, R. H. (2015) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.1590/s1806-92902015000700004 · Cited by 40
“…fed corn silage-based diets (7.3% to 8.4% GEI) using SF6 gas tracer techniques, and by Fitzsimons et al. (2013) for grass silage-based diets offered to Simmental heifers (12.6% GEI), with values established at the upper end of variation of 2% to 12% GEI as reported by Johnson and Johnson (1995).”
MethodInfluentialChuntrakort, P., Otsuka, M., Hayashi, K., Takénaka, A., Udchachon, S., & Sommart, K. (2014) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.003 · Cited by 40
Min, B. R., Pinchak, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Hume, M. E. (2006) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2005-399 · Cited by 40
“In the current study, M. smithii was chosen as a coculture strain because ruminal gases, particularly CH4, H2, and acetate, are related to dietary energy loss (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Miller, 1995).”
Impact of monensin on methane production and performance of cows fed forage diets
Sj, V. V., Gc, W., Da, C., & Sl, W. (2005) · Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production · Cited by 40
Is methane a new therapeutic gas?
Liu, W., Wang, D., Tao, H., & Sun, X. (2012) · Medical Gas Research · doi:10.1186/2045-9912-2-25 · Cited by 40
“In 1992, it was estimated methane would cause 15–17% of global warming over the next 50 years [19] and methane has a global warming potential of 25 compared to CO2 over a 100-year period (although accepted figures probably represents an underestimate [20].”
BackgroundPotential use of seaweed as a dietary supplement to mitigate enteric methane emission in ruminants
Wanapat, M., Prachumchai, R., Dagaew, G., Matra, M., Phupaboon, S., Sommai, S., & Suriyapha, C. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173015 · Cited by 53
Effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane production using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)
Romero-Pérez, A., Okine, E. K., Guan, L., Duval, S. M., Kindermann, M., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2015) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.002 · Cited by 43
O’Neill, B. F., Deighton, M. H., O’Loughlin, B. M., Galvin, N., O’Donovan, M., & Lewis, E. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5257 · Cited by 39
“The GEI lost as CH4 is typically 6 to 7% in forage-based diets (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundCunha, C. S., Marcondes, M. I., Veloso, C. M., Mantovani, H. C., Pereira, L. G. R., Tomich, T. R., Dill‐McFarland, K. A., & Suen, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9162 · Cited by 41
Saminathan, M., Sieo, C. C., Abdullah, N., Wong, C., & Ho, Y. W. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7016 · Cited by 39
Livestock Management Strategy Affects Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance of Subhumid Pasture
Oates, L. G., & Jackson, R. D. (2014) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/rem-d-12-00151.1 · Cited by 39
Environmental Aspects of Ethical Animal Production
Siegford, J. M., Powers, W. J., & Grimes-Casey, H. G. (2008) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00351 · Cited by 39
“Typically cattle grazing on pasture have diets high in fiber, which increases methane production compared with grain feeding practices in confinement (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Harper et al., 1999).”
BackgroundPoulsen, M., Jensen, B. B., & Engberg, R. M. (2011) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.12.009 · Cited by 40
Liu, Z., Wang, K., Nan, X., Cai, M., Yang, L., Xiong, B., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01908-21 · Cited by 42
“CH4 emission from ruminants is also a waste of feed energy, accounting for 2% to 12% of the total energy intake of feed (3).”
BackgroundRumen sampling methods bias bacterial communities observed
Hagey, J. V., Laabs, M., Maga, E. A., & DePeters, E. J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258176 · Cited by 41
“Additionally, methane production is energy inefficient, resulting in a 2–12% loss in gross energy intake in cattle [88].”
BackgroundInsights into the biotechnology potential of Methanosarcina
Carr, S., & Buan, N. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034674 · Cited by 38
“The methane produced by methanogens is of interest due to methane’s ecological impact resulting from agricultural production by livestock (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) and rice cultivation (Schütz et al.”
BackgroundRomero, P., Huang, R., Jiménez, E., Palma‐Hidalgo, J. M., Ungerfeld, E. M., Popova, M., Morgavi, D., Belanche, A., & Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R. (2023) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2023.100789 · Cited by 44
Cook, S. R., Maiti, P. K., Chaves, A. V., Benchaar, C., Beauchemin, K. A., & McAllister, T. A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07249 · Cited by 38
Carbon Footprint of Food Products
Röös, E., Sundberg, C., & Hansson, P. (2014) · Ecoproduction · doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-41-2_4 · Cited by 38
Chanthakhoun, V., Wanapat, M., Wachirapakorn, C., & Wanapat, S. (2011) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.003 · Cited by 38
Methane emissions from lactating and non-lactating dairy cows and growing cattle fed fresh pasture
Jonker, A., Molano, G., Koolaard, J. P., & Muetzel, S. (2016) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an15656 · Cited by 38
Lagrange, S., Beauchemin, K. A., MacAdam, J. W., & Villalba, J. J. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140788 · Cited by 39
Sun, K., Liu, H., Fan, H., Liu, T., & Zheng, C. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11151 · Cited by 49
“On average, approximately 8–12% of the energy consumed in feed is wasted in the form of CH4 emissions (Johnson & Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundMalik, P. K., Trivedi, S., Mohapatra, A., Kolte, A. P., Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., & Rahman, H. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256048 · Cited by 45
“5 kJ/l [8], resulting in the methane emitted by cattle accounting for 2–12% of gross energy intake [9].”
BackgroundInhibition of methanogenesis by tea saponin and tea saponin plus disodium fumarate in sheep
Yuan, Z., Zhang, C., Zhou, L., Zou, C., Guo, Y., Li, W., Liu, J., & Wu, Y. (2007) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/74607/2007 · Cited by 38
“Methane produced during ruminal fermentation represents a loss of 2-12% of gross energy intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundHünerberg, M., McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A., Okine, E. K., Harstad, O. M., & McAllister, T. A. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas2012-151 · Cited by 39
Measuring greenhouse gas emissions from point sources in agriculture
McGinn, S. M. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/s05-099 · Cited by 38
Anderson, R. C., Harvey, R. B., Byrd, J. A., Callaway, T. R., Genovese, K. J., Edrington, T. S., Jung, Y. S., McReynolds, J. L., & Nisbet, D. J. (2005) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/84.4.649 · Cited by 38
“for forage fed cattle (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
Methane emission from sheep grazing four pastures in late summer in New Zealand
Ulyatt, M. J., Lassey, K. R., Shelton, I. D., & Walker, C. F. (2005) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2005.9513671 · Cited by 38
Brown, E. G., Anderson, R. C., Carstens, G. E., Bañuelos, H. G., McReynolds, J. L., Slay, L. J., Callaway, T. R., & Nisbet, D. J. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.017 · Cited by 38
“Further, ruminants lose 2–15% of the gross energy (GE) they consume as enteric CH4 (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Van Nevel and Demeyer, 1996).”
BackgroundHuhtanen, P., Ramin, M., & Udén, P. (2015) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.009 · Cited by 37
“Greater depressions in CH4 emissions can be expected in feed-lot cattle fed high (490%) concentrated diets (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundUwituze, S., Parsons, G. L., Schneider, C., Karges, K. K., Gibson, M. L., Hollis, L. C., Higgins, J. J., & Drouillard, J. S. (2011) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3103 · Cited by 37
Sakthivel, P. C., Kamra, D. N., Agarwal, N., & Chaudhary, L. C. (2012) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2011.11383 · Cited by 37
“Methane is a natural by product of feed fermentation in the rumen which accounts for a significant loss (20 to 120 g/kg) of the dietary energy consumed by ruminants (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundWischer, G., Greiling, A. M., Boguhn, J., Steingaß, H., Schollenberger, M., Hartung, K., & Rodehutscord, M. (2014) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731114000639 · Cited by 43
“The release of methane seems to be a key-process in an unmodified rumen fermentation, but also represents an energy loss for the host animal (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
Methods and Techniques for Measuring Gas Emissions from Agricultural and Animal Feeding Operations
Hu, E., Babcock, E. L., Bialkowski, S. E., Jones, S. B., & Tuller, M. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/10408347.2013.843055 · Cited by 37
“Gas chromatography (GC) is a highly accurate method applicable for CH4, VOCs, and other GHGs (Blunden et al., 2005; Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVyas, D., McGeough, E. J. J., McGinn, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-7492 · Cited by 37
Long-term declines in dietary nutritional quality for North American cattle
Craine, J. M., Elmore, A. J., & Angerer, J. P. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa67a4 · Cited by 37
“The consequences of declining [CP] and increasing [DOM]:[CP] extend beyond greater nutritional stress as theywouldalsopromote greatermethane production, which could serve as a positive feedback to warming (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundCameron, L., Chagunda, M. G. G., Roberts, D. J., & Lee, M. A. (2018) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12353 · Cited by 37
Methane oxidation and its coupled electron-sink reactions in ruminal fluid
Kajikawa, H., Valdés, C., Hillman, K., Wallace, R. J., & Newbold, C. J. (2003) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01317.x · Cited by 37
“Methane is produced as a by-product of microbial fermentation in the rumen and methane production from enteric fermentation in domestic ruminants is a major source of biogenic methane production (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundBaert, N., Pellikaan, W. F., Karonen, M., & Salminen, J. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11069 · Cited by 41
“Although CH4 from enteric fermentation is a natural by-product of the digestive processes of ruminants, it represents a loss of 2 to 12% of the animal’s gross energy intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; McAllister et al., 1996).”
BackgroundInventory of methane emissions from U.S. cattle
Westberg, H. H., Lamb, B., Johnson, K., & Huyler, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900808 · Cited by 37
Garlic and Its Bioactive Compounds: Implications for Methane Emissions and Ruminant Nutrition
Sari, N. F., Ray, P. P., Rymer, C., Kliem, K. E., & Stergiadis, S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12212998 · Cited by 42
Li, Y., Mao, K., Zang, Y., Lu, G., Qiu, Q., Ouyang, K., Zhao, X., Song, X., Xu, L., Liang, H., et al. (2023) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-023-01682-z · Cited by 36
“The production of methane is known to result in dietary energy loss and accounts for 2–12% of the ruminant [41], thereby linking to poorer feed efficiency of the animal [42].”
BackgroundSubharat, S., Shu, D., Zheng, T., Buddle, B. M., Janssen, P. H., Luo, D., & Wedlock, D. N. (2015) · Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology · doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.02.008 · Cited by 36
Lovett, D. K., McGILLOWAY, D. A., Bortolozzo, A., Hawkins, M., Callan, J. J., Flynn, B., & O’Mara, F. P. (2006) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2006.00500.x · Cited by 36
Direct greenhouse gas emissions of the South African small stock sectors
Toit, C. D., van Niekerk, W., & Meissner, H. H. (2014) · South African Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4314/sajas.v43i3.8 · Cited by 36
“The production of methane is associated with a loss of 2% - 14% of dietary energy (Johnson & Johnson, 1995; Sallaku et al., 2011).”
BackgroundToxicity and Metabolism of Nitroalkanes and Substituted Nitroalkanes
Smith, D. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf3039583 · Cited by 36
Comparison of nutrient composition and anti-methanogenic properties of different Rosaceae species
Kara, K., Güçlü, B. K., & Baytok, E. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65613/2015 · Cited by 36
Liu, C., Li, X., Chen, Y. X., Cheng, Z., Duan, Q. H., Meng, Q. H., Tao, X. P., Shang, B., & Dong, H. (2016) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-016-0888-4 · Cited by 36
Chen, L., Ren, A., Zhou, C., & Tan, Z. (2016) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2016.1262753 · Cited by 36
Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Murphy, J. P., & Maghirang, R. G. (2017) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture7030016 · Cited by 36
“However, a strong relationship between them has not been documented [26].”
InfluentialAnimal health and greenhouse gas intensity: the paradox of periparturient parasitism
Houdijk, J. G. M., Tolkamp, B. J., Rooke, J. A., & Hutchings, M. R. (2017) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.03.006 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- ORCID
- Johnson, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2483-2492
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1837026033
- Cited by
- 2,714
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 131 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 135 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 150 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- methane emissions, cattle, ruminant livestock, enteric methane, global warming, methane mitigation, feed intake, dietary carbohydrates, feed processing, dietary fat, ionophores, tracer techniques, mass balance, micrometeorological methods, methane budget
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Atmosphere, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Chromatography, Gas, Diet, Eating, Eructation, Female, Fermentation, Methane, Rumen, Mass Spectrometry, Greenhouse Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review