The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methane emissions from cattle
Abstract
Increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane have led scientists to examine its sources of origin. Ruminant livestock can produce 250 to 500 L of methane per day. This level of production results in estimates of the contribution by cattle to global warming that may occur in the next 50 to 100 yr to be a little less than 2%. Many factors influence methane emissions from cattle and include the following: level of feed intake, type of carbohydrate in the diet, feed processing, addition of lipids or ionophores to the diet, and alterations in the ruminal microflora. Manipulation of these factors can reduce methane emissions from cattle. Many techniques exist to quantify methane emissions from individual or groups of animals. Enclosure techniques are precise but require trained animals and may limit animal movement. Isotopic and nonisotopic tracer techniques may also be used effectively. Prediction equations based on fermentation balance or feed characteristics have been used to estimate methane production. These equations are useful, but the assumptions and conditions that must be met for each equation limit their ability to accurately predict methane production. Methane production from groups of animals can be measured by mass balance, micrometeorological, or tracer methods. These techniques can measure methane emissions from animals in either indoor or outdoor enclosures. Use of these techniques and knowledge of the factors that impact methane production can result in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce methane losses by cattle. Implementation of these strategies should result in enhanced animal productivity and decreased contributions by cattle to the atmospheric methane budget.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Production of CH4 also deprives the host animal of carbon resources and results in loss of energy (13.3 Mcal/kg CH4), leading to poor feed efficiency (9).”
From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane
Cicerone, R. J., & Oremland, R. S. (1988) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/gb002i004p00299 · Cited by 1,586
Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere
(1991) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/bf00024600 · Cited by 1,220
Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants
Blaxter, K. L., & Clapperton, J. L. (1965) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19650046 · Cited by 944
Energy metabolism in animals and man
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5756 · Cited by 776
Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)
Czerkawski, J. W., & Breckenridge, G. (1977) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19770102 · Cited by 572
Johnson, K., Huyler, M. T., Westberg, H. H., Lamb, B., & Zimmerman, P. (1994) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00051a025 · Cited by 532
A Theoretical Rumen Fermentation Balance
Wolin, M. J. (1960) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(60)90348-9 · Cited by 480
An Introduction to Rumen Studies
(1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-00551-0 · Cited by 452
Methane Production in Dairy Cows
Moe, P. W., & Tyrrell, H. F. (1979) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83465-7 · Cited by 425
McLean, J. A., & Tobin, G. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663161 · Cited by 396
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
Sustainable improvement of animal production and health.
Odongo, N. E., García, M. A., & Viljoen, G. J. (2010) · Cited by 68
Rumen methanogens, and inhibition of methanogenesis
Baker, S. (1999) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar99005 · Cited by 68
“For example, the ionophore monensin is effective in enhancing propionate production from rumen fermentation (Table 2), and although there is an associated effect of decrease in CH4 production, the effect appears to be due to a reduction in feed intake, and the decrease in CH4 production is short-lived (Johnson et al.…”
BackgroundMethodA Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
Zhao, Y., Nan, X., Yang, L., Zheng, S., Jiang, L., & Xiong, B. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10061004 · Cited by 67
“After removal from the animal, the canister contents are analyzed using gas chromatography for CH4 and SF6 concentration determination [31].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnteric methane mitigation interventions
Fouts, J. Q., Honan, M. C., Roque, B. M., Tricárico, J. M., & Kebreab, E. (2022) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.1093/tas/txac041 · Cited by 85
“Additionally, organic matter fermentation and fiber digestibility decrease when lipids replace carbohydrates, resulting in a reduction of both VFA production and methanogenesis (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Haque, 2018).”
BackgroundRamin, M., & Huhtanen, P. J. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.03.008 · Cited by 67
Tea saponins affect in vitro fermentation and methanogenesis in faunated and defaunated rumen fluid
Hu, W., Wu, Y.-M., Liu, J.-X., Guo, Y.-Q., & JunAn, Y. (2005) · Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A · doi:10.1631/jzus.2005.b0787 · Cited by 67
“The global cattle population is responsible for 73% of methane emissions of all livestock, and methane produced during ruminal fermentation represents a loss of 2%~15% of gross energy intake and may contribute to global warming (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundEvolving understanding of rumen methanogen ecophysiology
Khairunisa, B. H., Heryakusuma, C., Ike, K. A., Mukhopadhyay, B., & Susanti, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296008 · Cited by 78
“A fiber-rich diet (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundHammond, K. J., Hoskin, S. O., Burke, J. L., Waghorn, G. C., Koolaard, J. P., & Muetzel, S. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.028 · Cited by 66
McAllister, T. A., Meale, S. J., Valle, E., Guan, L., Zhou, M., Kelly, W. J., Henderson, G., Attwood, G. T., & Janssen, P. H. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8329 · Cited by 69
“The level of animal feed intake is considered to be another factor affecting host enteric CH4 emissions (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundPacheco, D., Waghorn, G. C., & Janssen, P. H. (2014) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an14437 · Cited by 70
“013 Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Thomson NA (2006) Supplementing dairy cows with oils to improve performance and reduce methane – does it work? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 176–181. Yan T, Mayne CS, Gordon FG, Porter MG, Agnew RE, Patterson DC, Ferris CP, Kilpatrick DJ (2010) Mitigation…”
BackgroundInfluentialMartinez, M. E., Ranilla, M. J., Tejido, M. L., Saro, C., & Carro, M. D. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.04.005 · Cited by 65
Virtual herding for flexible livestock management – a review
Anderson, D. M., Estell, R. E., Holechek, J. L., Ivey, S. L., & Smith, G. B. (2014) · The Rangeland Journal · doi:10.1071/rj13092 · Cited by 66
“Cattle represent an important source of methane (CH4) production (Crutzen et al. 1986; Johnson and Johnson 1995; Wang et al. 2014).”
BackgroundPiñeiro-Vázquez, A., Canúl-Solís, J. R., Gamboa, J. A. A., Chay‐Canul, A. J., Ayala-Burgos, A. J., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., Solorio-Sánchez, F. J., & Kú-Vera, J. C. (2015) · Archivos de medicina veterinaria · doi:10.4067/s0301-732x2015000300002 · Cited by 73
Zhang, X. M., Smith, M. L., Gruninger, R. J., Kung, L., Vyas, D., McGinn, S. M., Kindermann, M., Wang, M., Tan, Z. L., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skab081 · Cited by 65
“Enteric CH4 emissions also represent 2% to 12% of gross energy (GE) intake of ruminants (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundLima, P. R., Apdini, T., Freire, A. S., de Sant’ana, A. S., Moura, L. M. L., Nascimento, J. C. S., Rodrigues, R. T. D. S., Dijkstra, J., Neto, A. F. G., Queiróz, M. A. Á., et al. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.017 · Cited by 65
Designing Diverse Agricultural Pastures for Improving Ruminant Production Systems
Distel, R. A., Arroquy, J. I., Lagrange, S., & Villalba, J. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.596869 · Cited by 66
“Methane is a byproduct of the microbial fermentation of feeds in the rumen, which represents an energy loss to the animal that ranges between 2 and 12% of the gross energy consumed with the diet (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundRecent advances in modeling nutrient utilization in ruminants1
Kebreab, E., Dijkstra, J., Bannink, A., & France, J. (2008) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1313 · Cited by 65
Rotz, C. A., Asem-Hiablie, S., Dillon, J. A., & Bonifacio, H. F. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8809 · Cited by 64
Sar, C., Santoso, B., Mwenya, B., Gamo, Y., Kobayashi, T., Morikawa, R., Kimura, K., Mizukoshi, H., & Takahashi, J. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.01.006 · Cited by 64
O’Brien, D., Shalloo, L., Patton, J., Buckley, F., Grainger, C. I., & Wallace, M. (2012) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731112000316 · Cited by 64
“In addition, TMR-fed cows emitted less enteric CH4 as a proportion of total DMI (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Bell et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeasurement of Methane Production from Ruminants
Bhatta, R., & Enishi, O. (2007) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2007.1305 · Cited by 64
“Because of the normal daily variation in emissions meaningful CH4 emission measurements is difficult and hence short term measurements might lead to erroneous results (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodMcParland, S., & Berry, D. P. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10051 · Cited by 64
“Methane emissions represent a loss of approximately 6% of ingested energy (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) and are therefore a likely contributing factor to differences among animals in feed efficiency.”
BackgroundWatt, L. J., Clark, C., Krebs, G. L., Petzel, C. E., Nielsen, S. G., & Utsumi, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9463 · Cited by 63
Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies
Key, N., & Tallard, G. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0206-6 · Cited by 63
“Emissions can also be reduced by improving feed quality: by increasing the proportion of concentrate in the diet, replacing fibrous with starch concentrate, increasing the digestibility of forage, using more legume rather than grass forage, using more silage rather than hay, and adding oils or oilseeds to the diet (Be…”
BackgroundWang, R., Wang, M., Ungerfeld, E. M., Zhang, X., Long, D. L., Mao, H., Deng, J. P., Bannink, A., & Tan, Z. L. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-14904 · Cited by 66
López‐Paredes, J., Goiri, I., Atxaerandio, R., García-Rodríguez, A., Ugarte, E., Jiménez-Montero, J. A., Alenda, R., & González-Recio, Ó. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17597 · Cited by 62
Sustainability of the Dairy Industry: Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities
Peterson, C. B., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2021.760310 · Cited by 73
“An increase in starch proportion of the diet, such as through an increase in concentrate levels, also results in a more rapid fermentation of these feedstuffs and therefore decreased CH4 production (Moe and Tyrrell, 1979; Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundIntroduction to Concepts of Climate Change Impact on Livestock and Its Adaptation and Mitigation
Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Soren, N. M., Malik, P. K., Ravindra, J. P., Prasad, C. S., & Lal, R. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_1 · Cited by 62
Brask, M., Weisbjerg, M. R., Hellwing, A. L. F., Bannink, A., & Lund, P. (2015) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731115001184 · Cited by 65
Piñeiro-Vázquez, Á. T., Canúl-Solís, J. R., Jiménez‐Ferrer, G., Gamboa, J. A. A., Chay‐Canul, A. J., Ayala-Burgos, A. J., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., & Kú-Vera, J. C. (2017) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.17.0192 · Cited by 70
“Additionally, CH4 emissions represent an energy loss which ranges from 2% to 12% of the gross energy consumed by ruminants [3].”
BackgroundHuang, X., Zhang, J. P., Storozum, M. J., Liu, S., Gill, J. L., Xiang, L., Ren, X., Wang, J., Qiang, M., Chen, F., et al. (2020) · Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology · doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104171 · Cited by 61
Management of Enteric Methanogenesis in Ruminants by Algal-Derived Feed Additives
McCauley, J. I., Labeeuw, L., Jaramillo-Madrid, A. C., Nguyen, L. N., Nghiem, L. D., Chaves, A. V., & Ralph, P. J. (2020) · Current Pollution Reports · doi:10.1007/s40726-020-00151-7 · Cited by 65
Bresolin, T., & Dórea, J. R. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00923 · Cited by 60
“Such interest is usually driven by concerns regarding the carbon footprint and lower feed efficiency due to energy losses in CH4 (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundIntensification and Driving Forces of Pastoralism in Northern China 5.7 ka Ago
Huang, X., Zhang, J., Ren, L., Zhang, S., & Chen, F. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl092288 · Cited by 59
“Livestock may have directly changed atmospheric composition via methane emissions (Johnson & Johnson, 1995) and they have also led to the degradation of grassland by grazing activity (Asner et al., 2004; Dai, 2010; X.-Z. Huang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundHales, K. E., Cole, N. A., & MacDonald, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5418 · Cited by 61
Li, Z., Wright, A. G., Liu, H., Bao, K., Zhang, T., Wang, K., Cui, X., Yang, F., Zhang, Z., & Li, G. (2014) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-014-0497-z · Cited by 59
“The different interplays in the OL group compared to the CS and CI groups may be related to the tannins in the oak leaves, which could decrease methane emissions causing energy loss to the host [53, 54].”
Karnati, S. K. R., Sylvester, J. T., Ribeiro, C. V. D. M., Gilligan, L. E., & Firkins, J. L. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1436 · Cited by 61
“Although BH uses metabolic hydrogen, BH probably plays only a minor role in reducing methane emissions (Johnson and Johnson, 1995), so we have no explanation for the trend (P = 0.”
BackgroundLyons, T., Boland, T. M., Storey, S., & Doyle, E. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01656 · Cited by 60
“This results in increased methane in the atmosphere and an energy loss of 2–13% for the animal, impacting feed efficiency in animal production (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundEnteric methane emission can be reliably measured by the GreenFeed monitoring unit
Huhtanen, P. J., Ramin, M., & Hristov, A. N. (2019) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.017 · Cited by 62
More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets
Paganoni, B. L., Rose, I., Macleay, C., Jones, C., Brown, D. J., Kearney, G. A., Ferguson, M. B., & Thompson, A. N. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2017.1499 · Cited by 61
Romero, P., Belanche, A., Jiménez, E., Hueso, R., Ramos‐Morales, E., Salwen, J. K., Kebreab, E., & Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00935-z · Cited by 68
“The release of enteric CH 4 into the atmosphere represents a negative impact on the environment as its global warming potential is 28–34 times that of CO 2 over 20-year horizon, but also a loss of 2%–12% of the gross feed energy from the animal [2].”
BackgroundMoate, P. J., Deighton, M. H., Williams, S. R. O., Pryce, J. E., Hayes, B. J., Jacobs, J. L., Eckard, R., Hannah, M. C., & Wales, W. J. (2015) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an15222 · Cited by 60
“However, it is known that diets containing a high proportion of starch-containing grains decrease methane yield compared with forage-based diets (Johnson and Johnson 1995; Beauchemin and McGinn 2005).”
BackgroundGrainger, C. I., Clarke, T., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., & Eckard, R. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07224 · Cited by 60
Pei, C.-X., Mao, S., Cheng, Y., & Zhu, W. (2009) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109990681 · Cited by 60
“The ruminal methanogenic population has become a focus of increasing scientific attention for the negative effect of methanogenesis on dietary energy and environment (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundMolina-Botero, I. C., Angarita, E., Mayorga, O. L., Chará, J., & Rosales, R. B. (2016) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.009 · Cited by 63
“5, methane loss is minimal (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) because the lowering ruminal pH inhibits the growth of methanogenic microorganisms (Van Kessel and Russell, 1996).”
BackgroundIslam, M., & Lee, S.-S. (2019) · Journal of Animal Science and Technology · doi:10.5187/jast.2019.61.3.122 · Cited by 75
“ruminants represents a gross energy loss from 2% to 14% of gross energy consumption [7].”
BackgroundBayat, A. R., Ventto, L., Kairenius, P., Stefański, T., Leskinen, H., Tapio, I., Negussie, E., Vilkki, J., & Shingfield, K. J. (2017) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.2527/tas2017.0032 · Cited by 59
“Enteric methane (CH4) production is the major source of GHG emissions from ruminants that represents a loss of 2 to 12% of GE intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundMartinez-Fernandez, G., Denman, S. E., Cheung, J., & McSweeney, C. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01871 · Cited by 59
“Methane is a potent greenhouse gas and also represents a loss of gross feed energy for the ruminant, hence the increasing interest in strategies to manipulate CH4 production (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Gerber et al., 2013).”
BackgroundOliveira, P. P. A., Berndt, A., Pedroso, A. D. F., Alves, T. C., Pezzopane, J. R. M., Sakamoto, L. S., Henrique, F. L., & Rodrigues, P. H. M. (2020) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731120001822 · Cited by 63
Ding, X., Long, R., Kreuzer, M., Mi, J., & Yang, B. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.007 · Cited by 59
Wedlock, D. N., Pedersen, G., Denis, M., Dey, D., Janssen, P. H., & Buddle, B. M. (2010) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2010.65058 · Cited by 59
“The formation of methane by methanogens, from H 2 and CO 2 , represents a loss of fed energy (Johnson and Johnson 1995 ; Van Nevel and Demeyer 1996 ), and it has been suggested that in the absence of methanogens other microorganisms could capture this H 2 by converting it to acetate (McAllister and Newbold 2008 ).”
Dittmann, M. T., Runge, U., Lang, R. A., Moser, D., Galeffi, C., Kreuzer, M., & Clauß, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094363 · Cited by 64
“One of the side products of this fermentation process is CH4, a greenhouse gas (GHG) that also represents a loss of energy to the host animal [1].”
BackgroundRasmussen, J., & Harrison, A. P. (2011) · ISRN Veterinary Science · doi:10.5402/2011/613172 · Cited by 64
“PUFA also has an inhibitory effect on methane production through direct use of hydrogen by saturation in the rumen [1, 5, 9, 10].”
BackgroundBeaudet, V., Gervais, R., Graulet, B., Nozière, P., Doreau, M. M., Fanchone, A., Castagnino, D. S., & Girard, C. L. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10521 · Cited by 65
“Dietary characteristics, such as carbohydrate source and protein supply, affect fermentation and microorganisms in the rumen (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Hristov et al., 2001; Belanche et al., 2012).”
Huyen, N. T., Desrues, O., Alferink, S. J. J., Zandstra, T., Verstegen, M. W. A., Hendriks, W. H., & Pellikaan, W. F. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10583 · Cited by 64
“Ruminants typically lose between 2 and 12% of their ingested energy as eructated CH 4 (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
Zhang, J., Shi, H., Wang, Y., Cao, Z., Yang, H., & Li, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00976 · Cited by 60
“Methane (CH4) emitted from ruminants accounts for 4– 12% of gross energy loss, and also causes environmental problems due to its remarkable global warming potential (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Kumar et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWinders, T., Jolly-Breithaupt, M. L., Wilson, H. C., MacDonald, J. C., Erickson, G. E., & Watson, A. K. (2019) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.1093/tas/txz027 · Cited by 59
“…doi: 10.1093/tas/txz027 INTRODUCTION Energy lost as methane (CH4) by ruminants can range from 2% to 12% of total gross energy Translate basic science to industry innovation 776 Winders et al. intake (GEI), but is variable depending on diet composition and energy density (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialAuffret, M. D., Stewart, R. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01229 · Cited by 65
“However, it is used by methanogenic archaea to reduce CO2 to methane (CH4; Hungate, 1967) leading to the loss of feed gross energy, estimated at 2–12% (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundChoi, Y., Lee, S. J., Kim, H. S., Eom, J. S., Jo, S. U., Guan, L. L., Seo, J., Kim, H., Lee, S. S., & Lee, S. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03356-y · Cited by 64
“The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify the metabolites and potential antioxidants (including the flavonoid and phenol content) of the three brown seaweed extracts; (2) determine if the polyphenolic compounds in the seaweed extracts reduced enteric CH4 and CO2 production; (3) examine the effect of seaw…”
Wasson, D. E., Yarish, C., & Hristov, A. N. (2022) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2022.999338 · Cited by 72
“In addition to the contribution of enteric CH4 to climate change, it also accounts for gross feed energy intake losses between 2 and 12% (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundReducing CH4 Emissions from Grazing Ruminants in New Zealand: Challenges and Opportunities
Clark, H., Kelliher, F. M., & Pinares-Patiño, C. S. (2010) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2011.r.04 · Cited by 59
“Previous studies from Australia and North America (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; McGinn et al., 2006; Grainger et al., 2007) found that on average there is close agreement between values obtained using the two techniques but this has not always been found to be the case (Pinares-Patino et al., 2007a).”
ResultLi, Z., Zhang, Z., Xu, C., Zhao, J., Liu, H., Fan, Z., Yang, F., Wright, A. G., & Li, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114513 · Cited by 59
“Enteric methane not only contributes to global warming and climate change, but also represents a significant energy loss to cattle ranging from 2% to 12% of gross energy intake [12, 13].”
BackgroundGrainger, C. I., Williams, S. R. O., Eckard, R., & Hannah, M. C. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3154 · Cited by 58
“However, others have shown that reductions in CH4 emissions due to monensin may not persist beyond several weeks (Johnson and Johnson, 1995; Sauer et al., 1998; Guan et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBoots, B., Lillis, L. L., Clipson, N., Petrie, K., Kenny, D. A., Boland, T. M., & Doyle, E. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12067 · Cited by 58
“CH4 production from ruminants is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in economies reliant on livestock agriculture (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundMitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies
Caro, D., Kebreab, E., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1686-1 · Cited by 58
“Decreasing fiber (neutral detergent fiber, NDF) proportion, while increasing the amount of crude fat (ether extract, EE) in dairy diet reduces enteric CH 4 emissions (Granger et al. 2008; Jordan et al. 2006; Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundShah, A., Allen, G., Pitt, J., Ricketts, H. M. A. M., Williams, P. I., Helmore, J., Finlayson, A., Robinson, R. A., Kabbabe, K., Hollingsworth, P. M., et al. (2019) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos10070396 · Cited by 58
In Vitro Evaluation of Different Dietary Methane Mitigation Strategies
Chagas, J. C. C., Ramin, M., & Krizsan, S. J. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9121120 · Cited by 64
“Methane losses from typical dairy cow diets are 6–7% of gross energy intake, but losses are approximately 3% in feedlot situations, indicating that feeding high-concentrate diets can reduce CH4 production [7].”
BackgroundMethane Emissions from Grazing Cattle Using Point‐Source Dispersion
McGinn, S. M., Turner, D., Tomkins, N. W., Charmley, E., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., & Chen, D. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0239 · Cited by 57
“Th e CH4 loss by ruminants, arising from the process of fermenting carbohydrates, represents 2 to 12% of the gross energy content of the feed (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundWierenga, K. T., McAllister, T. A., Gibb, D. J., Chaves, A. V., Okine, E. K., Beauchemin, K. A., & Oba, M. (2010) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2703 · Cited by 57
“Propionate is a VFA that acts as a hydrogen sink and is associated with reduced methane production (Johnson and Johnson, 1995), a factor that may explain the increase in NEg content of the diet as triticale DDGS replaced barley silage.”
BackgroundRanilla, M. J., Jouany, J. P., & Morgavi, D. P. (2007) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2007.02251.x · Cited by 57
“Ruminants are the main agricultural source of methane (Johnson and Johnson 1995) and the contribution of protozoa to the production of this greenhouse gas in the rumen has been estimated to be up to 37% (Finlay et al.”
BackgroundLovett, D. K., Bortolozzo, A., Conaghan, P., O’Kiely, P., & O’Mara, F. P. (2004) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00421.x · Cited by 57
Jayasundara, S., Appuhamy, R., Kebreab, E., & Wagner‐Riddle, C. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2015-0111 · Cited by 63
“…are two primary mechanisms that explain variation in enteric CH4 production in ruminants: dietary carbohydrate fermented in the rumen, and the mechanism regulating availability of hydrogen for CH4 production related to the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid production (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundMizrahi, I. (2013) · The Prokaryotes · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30194-0_1 · Cited by 56
Asanuma, N., Yokoyama, S., & Hino, T. (2014) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.12307 · Cited by 56
Use of a novel nitrotoxin-metabolizing bacterium to reduce ruminal methane production
Anderson, R. C., & Rasmussen, M. A. (1998) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00184-3 · Cited by 56
Dryahina, K., Smith, D. C., & Španěl, P. (2010) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.4513 · Cited by 56
Shetty, N., Difford, G. F., Lassen, J., Løvendahl, P., & Buitenhuis, B. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13014 · Cited by 57
“In addition to its relevance on climate impact, the eructed CH4 induces a significant loss of gross energy intake as CH4 reduces the availability of consumed energy for the cow (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundJafari, S., Ebrahimi, M. M., Goh, Y. M., Rajion, M. A., Jahromi, M. F., & Al-Jumaili, W. S. (2018) · Annals of Animal Science · doi:10.2478/aoas-2018-0037 · Cited by 64
“This energy is eventually wasted in S. Jafari et al.4 the form of CH4 (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundKaharabata, S. K., Schuepp, P. H., & Desjardins, R. L. (2000) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es990578c · Cited by 56
Advances in pasture plant breeding for animal productivity and health
Woodfield, D., & Easton, H. S. (2004) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2004.36446 · Cited by 56
“Higher lipid content is also thought to provide a means to reduce methane emissions from ruminants (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundAlemu, A. W., Janzen, H., Little, S., Hao, X., Thompson, D. J., Baron, V., Iwaasa, A., Beauchemin, K. A., & Kröbel, R. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.08.003 · Cited by 61
Chen, D., Chen, X., Tu, Y., Wang, B., Can, L., Ma, T., & Diao, Q. (2015) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2015.12.008 · Cited by 58
“Depending on different diets, the amount of energy loss by CH4 emission represented a 2 to 12% energy loss of feed (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundKelln, B., Penner, G. B., Acharya, S. N., McAllister, T. A., & Lardner, H. A. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2020-0096 · Cited by 71
“Given the high energy content in methane (CH4) (13.3 Mcal·kg −1; Aboagye 2019), the process of methane production represents an energetic loss to the animal, equivalent to as much as 12% of gross energy intake of the host (Czerkawski 1969; Johnson and Johnson 1995; Beauchemin et al. 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialKim, E. T., Kim, C. H., Min, K., & Lee, S. S. (2012) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2011.11447 · Cited by 55
Navarro‐Villa, A., O’Brien, M., López, S., Boland, T. M., & O’Kiely, P. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.091 · Cited by 55
Wischer, G., Boguhn, J., Steingaß, H., Schollenberger, M., & Rodehutscord, M. (2013) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113001481 · Cited by 58
Li, Z., Liu, N., Cao, Y., Jin, C., Li, F., Cai, C., & Yao, J. (2018) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-018-0235-3 · Cited by 54
“Therefore, the metabolism of FA was slower in the animals fed lowFps:Cps diet than fed high-Fps:Cps diet, and the duration of the positive stimulation of FA on fumarate-utilizing bacteria became longer, resulting in greater responses in CH4 mitigation and propionate increase.”
InfluentialAnderson, R. C., Carstens, G. E., Miller, R. K., Callaway, T. R., Schultz, C. L., Edrington, T. S., Harvey, R. B., & Nisbet, D. J. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.013 · Cited by 55
“…feature of these nitrocompounds is that they also inhibit the growth of the zoonotic pathogens, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter and Salmonella (Dimitrijevic et al., 2005; Jung et al., 2003, 2004a,b) and thus have the potential to be developed into a responsible preharvest food safety program.”
BackgroundLiu, Y., Ma, T., Chen, D., Zhang, N., Si, B., Deng, K., Tu, Y., & Diao, Q. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9010029 · Cited by 54
“5% of the methane is produced by feed fermentation in the rumen [4] and is exhaled through the nose and mouth; it represents a loss of 2–12% of the feed energy, depending on the diet [5].”
BackgroundGrazing alters net ecosystem C fluxes and the global warming potential of a subtropical pasture
Gomez‐Casanovas, N., DeLucia, N. J., Bernacchi, C. J., Boughton, E. H., Sparks, J. P., Chamberlain, S. D., & DeLucia, E. H. (2017) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1670 · Cited by 54
Stepanchenko, N., Stefenoni, H., Hennessy, M. L., Nagaraju, I., Wasson, D. E., Cueva, S. F., Räisänen, S. E., Dechow, C. D., Pitta, D., & Hristov, A. N. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-23190 · Cited by 62
Chagunda, M. G. G. (2013) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113000724 · Cited by 54
“At animal level, the production of enteric methane represents an energy loss, which can range from 0.02 to 0.12 of gross energy intake, varying with the type of diet fed (Johnson and Johnson 1995; Ellis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialCharmley, E., Stephens, M., & Kennedy, P. M. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07264 · Cited by 54
“Low animal productivity is associated with high methane output per unit of product and low pasture quality is associated with high methane output per unit of dry matter (DM) intake (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundKantanen, J., Løvendahl, P., Strandberg, E., Eythórsdóttir, E., Li, M.-H., Kettunen-Præbel, A., Berg, P., & Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00052 · Cited by 59
“There have been several methods used to measure CH4 concentrations, such as gas chromatography, mass spectroscopy, and a tunable laser diode technique (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
MethodSaengkerdsub, S., Kim, W.-K., Anderson, R. C., Nisbet, D. J., & Ricke, S. C. (2006) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.11.006 · Cited by 54
“Methane, a greenhouse gas, accounts for 2–12% of dietary energy loss in ruminants [14].”
BackgroundGeough, E. J. M., O’Kiely, P., Foley, P. A., Hart, K. J., Boland, T. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2009) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2380 · Cited by 80
“Methane also represents a loss of energy for the animal, accounting for 0.02 to 0.12 of GE intake (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialO’Hara, E., Kenny, D. A., McGovern, E., Byrne, C. J., McCabe, M. S., Guan, L. L., & Waters, S. M. (2020) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiz203 · Cited by 62
Methane emissions from feedlot cattle in Australia and Canada
McGinn, S. M., Chen, D., Loh, Z. M., Hill, J., Beauchemin, K. A., & Denmead, O. T. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07204 · Cited by 54
“However, the composition of the feed also influences enteric CH4 losses (Johnson and Johnson 1995); over the short-term (several weeks) diets consisting of high forage increase CH4 emissions (g CH4/day), CH4 yield (g CH4/kg dry matter intake) and CH4 % of gross energy (GE) relative to high grain diets (Beauchemin and…”
BackgroundAttwood, G., & McSweeney, C. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07203 · Cited by 72
“In addition to its greenhouse gas effects, the formation of methane is energetically wasteful to ruminants as it results in the loss of 2–12% of the gross energy consumed by the animal (Johnson and Johnson 1995).”
BackgroundCunha, C. S., Veloso, C. M., Marcondes, M. I., Mantovani, H. C., Tomich, T. R., Pereira, L. G. R., Ferreira, M. F. L., Dill‐McFarland, K. A., & Suen, G. (2017) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2017.07.008 · Cited by 55
“The release of methane not only deprives the host of important carbon resources [17] but also significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and global warming [15].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- ORCID
- Johnson, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2483-2492
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1837026033
- Cited by
- 2,714
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 131 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 135 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 150 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- methane emissions, cattle, ruminant livestock, enteric methane, global warming, methane mitigation, feed intake, dietary carbohydrates, feed processing, dietary fat, ionophores, tracer techniques, mass balance, micrometeorological methods, methane budget
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Atmosphere, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Chromatography, Gas, Diet, Eating, Eructation, Female, Fermentation, Methane, Rumen, Mass Spectrometry, Greenhouse Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review