The Embeddedness of Information Systems Habits in Organizational and Individual Level Routines: Development and Disruption1
Abstract
Despite recent interest in studying information system habits, our understanding of how these habits develop and operate in an organizational context is still limited. Within organizations, IS habits may develop over long periods of time and are typically embedded within larger, frequently practiced, higher-level work routines or task sequences. When new systems are introduced for the purpose of at least partially replacing incumbent systems, existing IS habits embedded in these routines may inhibit adoption and use of the new systems. Therefore, understanding how work-related IS habits form, how they enable and inhibit behavior, and how they can be disrupted or encouraged requires that we examine them within the context of organizational and individual level work routines. The current study integrates psychology and organizational behavior literature on cognitive scripts and work routines to examine IS habits as they occur embedded within larger, more complex task sequences. The objective of the paper is to contribute to the IS habit literature by (1) situating IS habits within the context of their associated work routines and task sequences, and (2) providing a theoretical understanding of how incumbent system habits can be disrupted, and how development of new system habits can be encouraged, within this context. We draw from extant research in psychology, organizational behavior, and consumer behavior to offer propositions about context-focused organizational interventions to break, or otherwise discourage, the continued performance of incumbent system habits and to encourage the development of new system habits. Specifically, our theoretical development includes script disruption techniques, training-in-context, and performance goal suspension as organizational interventions that disrupt incumbent system habits. We further theorize how stabilizing contextual variables associated with modified work routines can facilitate the development of new system habits. The paper concludes by discussing the importance of combining intervention strategies to successfully disrupt incumbent system habits and encourage development of new system habits and thus facilitate adoption of new systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Content creators feel the need to become more professional, design their content independently, and develop work routines and habits individually.
“Content creators feel the need to become more professional, design their content independently, and develop work routines and habits individually (Polites and Karahanna 2013).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Polites and Karahanna 2013
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480 · see citing works
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To break a habit, we must therefore break the link between the goal and its associated behavior (Gollwitzer and Sheeran 2006; Sheeran et al. 2005; Verplanken 2005).”
Reflections on Past Behavior: A Self‐Report Index of Habit Strength <sup>1</sup>
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x · Cited by 2,030 · see citing works
Categorization of action slips
Norman, D. A. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.1.1 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface.
Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.843 · Cited by 1,470 · see citing works
Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action.
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1281 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410404 · Cited by 679 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Given that new systems are often introduced to only partially replace incumbent systems, IS researchers have also begun to investigate how incumbent system habits may inhibit adoption and use of new systems (Polites and Karahanna 2012).”
Self-citationChanging circumstances, disrupting habits.
Wood, W., Tam, L., & Witt, M. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.918 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2012/36.1.02 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting Fruit Consumption: Cognitions, Intention, and Habits
Brug, J., de Vet, E., de Nooijer, J., & Verplanken, B. (2006) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2005.11.027 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987 · see citing works
Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1977729 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Hödl, T., & Myrach, T. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00808-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-246
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2118151786
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 27.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- work routines, task sequences, cognitive scripts, habit disruption, system adoption, organizational interventions, habit formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review