Cited by 761Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Computing Contrasts, Effect Sizes, and Counternulls on Other People's Published Data: General Procedures for Research Consumers

Open access
Rosnow, Ralph L., Rosenthal, Robert·1996·Psychological Methods

Abstract

We describe convenient statistical procedures that will enable research consumers (e.g,, professional psychologists, graduate students, and researchers themselves) to reach beyond the published conclusions and make an independent assessment of the reported results. Appropriately conceived contrasts accompanied by effect size estimates often allow researchers to address precise predictions that the authors of the published report may have ignored or abandoned prematurely. We describe the use of t, F, and Z to compute contrasts with different raw ingredients, and we review 3 effect size indices (Cohen's d, Hedges's g, and the Pearson r) and a way of displaying the magnitude of any effect size r. We also describe how to construct confidence limits for the obtained effect as well as its null-counternull interval.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.1.4.331

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
1996-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
331-340
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2061647004
Cited by
761
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
research consumers, effect size, Cohen's d, confidence intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review