The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes toward Animals
Abstract
To examine the relationship among gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals, 144 male and 222 female college students were administered the Bem Sex Role Inventory, a Likert-scale questionnaire designed to assess attitudes toward animal welfare issues, and a measure of perceived comfort touching animals of a variety of species. There were significant gender differences on all of the animal-related measures with the exception of self-reported comfort touching positively perceived animals. Gender and the expressive (feminine) dimension of sex role orientation accounted for a significant proportion of the variation in attitudes toward animal welfare issues and comfort with other species. Correlations between the masculine and feminine dimensions of sex role orientation were related in opposite directions on all animal attitude measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Cited by
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review
Herzog, H. A. (2007) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279307780216687 · Cited by 465
Self-citationFactors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare
Serpell, J. (2004) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600014500 · Cited by 384
Toward a psychology of human–animal relations.
Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038147 · Cited by 328
Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind
Knight, S., Vrij, A., Cherryman, J., & Nunkoosing, K. (2004) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279304786991945 · Cited by 212
Students’ attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia
Phillips, C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, S., Alonso, M., Choe, B., Hanlon, A., Handziska, A., Illmann, G., Keeling, L., Kennedy, M., et al. (2012) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/096272812799129466 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Herzog, H. A., Betchart, N. S., & Pittman, R. B.
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 184-191
- ISSN
- 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0377
- OpenAlex
- W2006530246
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
