Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Empathy, Perception of Pain and Attitudes toward Pets among Norwegian Dog Owners

Ellingsen, Kristian, Zanella, Adroaldo Jose, Bjerkås, Ellen, Indrebø, Astrid·2010·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Anthropomorphism, attachment level, and belief in animal mind, as well as owners' level of empathy and attitudes toward their pets, are some of the factors that affect human–animal interactions. Owners' ability to identify painful conditions in their pets may have important consequences for the welfare of these animals. In addition to characterizing the typical Norwegian dog owner, the aim of this work was to study the relationship between empathy, attitudes, and perceived animal pain. A sample of 3,413 dog owners in Norway received an internet-based questionnaire (QuestBack™), to which1896 responded. The questionnaire included four parts: demographics, the Pet Attitude Scale (PAS), the Animal Empathy Scale (AES), and the Pain Assessment Instrument (PAI). For the PAI, participants were presented with 17 photos, showing dogs experiencing painful situations of varying degrees, and were asked to rate the level of pain they believed each animal was enduring, using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results showed that Norwegian dog owners had very high levels of animal-directed empathy and equally high levels of positive attitudes toward pets. There were differences based on gender, childhood pet keeping, income and education. Differences were also found rooted in owners' use of their dog, whether kept for companionship or hunting, as well as household size, an indication of human social relations. A strong, positive correlation (r = 0.58) was found between animal-directed empathy an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303710x12750451258931

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Al-Fayez G., 2003, Society & Animals, 11, 17, 10.1163/156853003321618819 · DOI
  2. Bateson P., 1991, Animal Behaviour, 42, 827, 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80127-7 · DOI
  3. Batson C. D., 1998, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 282
  4. Bennett P. C., 2007, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65
  5. Broom D. M., 1991, Journal of Animal Science, 69, 4167, 10.2527/1991.69104167x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Capner C. A., 1999, Veterinary Record, 145, 95, 10.1136/vr.145.4.95 · DOI
  7. Clark G. I., 1993, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 37, 147, 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90107-Z · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF02310555 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Daly B., 2003, Anthrozoös, 16, 298, 10.2752/089279303786992026 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/brain/awl155 · DOI
  11. Davis S. L., 1998, Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2072, 10.2527/1998.7682072x · DOI
  12. de Vignemont F., 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 435
  13. Eagly A. H., 1993, Psychology of Attitudes.
  14. Epley N., 2008, Psychological Science, 114
  15. 10.2752/089279303786992260 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.10.025 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2752/089279307780216687 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
  19. Hills A. M., 1993, Society & Animals, 1, 111, 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
  20. 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hugonnard M., 2004, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 31, 154, 10.1111/j.1467-2987.2004.00175.x · DOI
  22. 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3.715 · DOI
  23. Kielland C., 2008, Proceedings of the 42nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology
  24. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.018 · DOI
  25. 10.1163/156853097X00060 · DOI
  26. Paul E. S., 2000, Anthrozoös, 13, 194, 10.2752/089279300786999699 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Paul E. S., 2000, Veterinary Record, 146, 269, 10.1136/vr.146.10.269 · DOI
  28. Paul E. S., 1993, Animal Welfare, 2, 321, 10.1017/S0962728600016109 · DOI
  29. Robinson M. E., 2003, Pain, 104, 259, 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00014-9 · DOI
  30. Rutherford K. M. D., 2002, Animal Welfare, 11, 31, 10.1017/S0962728600024301 · DOI
  31. Schenk S. A., 1994, Anthrozoös, 7, 60, 10.2752/089279394787002041 · DOI
  32. Serpell J., 1981, Psychological Reports, 49, 651, 10.2466/pr0.1981.49.2.651 · DOI
  33. 10.1163/156853003321618864 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Sherman B. L., 2008, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 35, 496, 10.3138/jvme.35.4.496 · DOI
  35. Signal T. D., 2006, Society & Animals, 14, 147, 10.1163/156853006776778743 · DOI
  36. Signal T. D., 2007, Anthrozoös, 20, 125, 10.2752/175303707X207918 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sullivan M. J. L., 2006, Pain, 123, 37, 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.007 · DOI
  38. Taylor H., 2004, Anthrozoös, 353
  39. 10.2752/089279305785594342 · DOI
  40. Templer D. I., 1981, The Psychological Record, 31, 343, 10.1007/BF03394747 · DOI
  41. Wensley S. F., 2008, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 532
  42. 10.1080/00480169.2005.36504 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 97

Metadata

Authors
Ellingsen, K., Zanella, A. J., Bjerkås, E., & Indrebø, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2010-09
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
231-243
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
97
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review