The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sociality Motivation and Anthropomorphic Thinking about Pets
Abstract
Sociality motivation, the need to feel socially connected with others, has been proposed as an important determinant of individual variation in anthropomorphic thinking. Specifically, it has been suggested that people who are socially isolated or disconnected will tend to infer more human-like mental states in animals and other nonhuman agents (computers, robots, metaphysical beings, etc.), than those who have higher levels of contact with other people. We investigated this hypothesis in a community-based sample of cat and dog owners, measuring degree of anthropomorphism by asking them which emotions they believed their pet was capable of experiencing, how likely they were to rely on it for social support, and how attached they were to it. Structural measures of social disconnection, including the number of other adults living in the household and the number of social contacts outside the home, were not generally associated with the tendency to think anthropomorphically about pets. However, owners living in households with no children (under the age of 16 years) reported higher levels of attachment to their pet than did those with children (B = 1.678, p < 0.001), and felt that they derived relatively more social support from it than they did from humans (F(1,244) = 4.997, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.020). In addition, a trait-based indicator of social disconnection (self-reported anxiety about human social relationships) was associated with a heightened tendency for owners to re…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People who feel lonely or chronically lack social connection may compensate by creating a sense of human connection with nonhuman agents, anthropomorphizing them.
“People who feel lonely or chronically lack social connection with other humans may try to compensate by creating a sense of human connection with nonhuman agents, anthropomorphizing them”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
Attachment to animals is associated with empathy, attitudes, and prosocial behavior towards them, and with anthropomorphism.
“Attachment to animals is associated with empathy, attitudes and prosocial behavior towards them [13,39] and with anthropomorphism [65,212,214].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
Anthropomorphism is a key aspect in the formation of the human-animal bond and the practice of pet keeping, allowing people to identify and address the needs and psychological states of animals in a context of reciprocal beneficial interaction.
“It has been suggested that anthropomorphism is a key aspect in the formation of the human–animal bond and the practice of pet keeping, since it allows people to identify and address the needs and the psychological states of animals in a context of reciprocal beneficial interaction [149,214].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
Citations
Cites
A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies
Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027504268574 · Cited by 4,781
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1×
“…tell us about people, including our cognitive evolution (Mithen 1996; Bradshaw and Paul 2010), our capacity to both humanize and dehumanize others (Haslam 2006; Epley, Waytz and Cacioppo 2007), and the mechanisms and functions of mental state attributions (Serpell 2003; Epley et al. 2008a,b;…”
BackgroundFriends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership.
McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024506 · Cited by 704
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x · Cited by 632
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion
McCutcheon, R. T., & Guthrie, S. E. (1994) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386639 · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“While the objects of anthropomorphism can include gods, natural entities, and man-made machines such as robots and computers (Guthrie 1993; Mithen 1996), nonhuman animals are the primary focus of anthropomorphic thinking for many people in the Western world today (Horowitz and Bekoff 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Adamelli S., 2005, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 94, 89, 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.003 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303710X12627079939143 · DOI
- Antonacopoulos N. M. D., 2010, Society & Animals, 18, 379, 10.1163/156853010X524334 · DOI
- Archer J., 2011, In The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology, 281
- 10.1023/A:1005653411471 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.11.009 · DOI
- Bonas S., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 209
- Boyce P., 1989, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 341, 10.1177/000486748902300301 · DOI
- Bradshaw J. W. S., 2011, In Defense of Dogs: Why Dogs Need Our Understanding.
- Bradshaw J. W. S., 2007, Animal Welfare, 149
- Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Limond, J. 1997. Attachment to cats and its relationship with emotional support: A cross cultural study. Paper presented at the ISAZ annual conference, Boston, USA, July 24–25, 1997.
- Bradshaw J. W. S., 2001, In Proceedings of the 9th International IAHAIO Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Bradshaw J. W. S., 2010, Animal Welfare, 107
- Casey R. A., 2008, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 196, 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13284201003662800 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224540903368533 · DOI
- Collis, D., Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Cook, S. E. 1998. Effects of reproductive status on women's “attachment” to their cats. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Animal Interactions, Prague, Czech Republic, September 10–12, 1998.
- 10.1192/bjp.176.4.379 · DOI · Paper page
- Crawford E. K., 2006, Anthrozoös, 19, 98, 10.2752/089279306785593757 · DOI
- 10.1300/J052v15n03_02 · DOI · Paper page
- Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71, 10.1080/02699930244000444 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J · DOI · Paper page
- Enders-Slegers M-J., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 237
- 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
- Fidler M., 1996, Anthrozoös, 9, 196, 10.2752/089279396787001356 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279307X245473 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00125-5 · DOI
- Haselton M. G., 2006, Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 47, 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3 · DOI · Paper page
- Herzog H., 2010, Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight about Animals.
- Himsworth C. G., 2013, Anthrozoös, 26, 295, 10.2752/175303713X13636846944448 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279307780216650 · DOI
- Kiesler S., 2006, Anthrozoös, 19, 335, 10.2752/089279306785415448 · DOI
- 10.1080/07370010701836286 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265407507087958 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014979 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/175303711X12998632257585 · DOI · Paper page
- Mithen S., 1996, The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science.
- 10.1080/02699930701273716 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1403494809344358 · DOI
- Paul E. S., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 168
- 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187 · DOI · Paper page
- Sanefuji W., 2007, Journal of Ethology, 25, 249, 10.1007/s10164-006-0018-8 · DOI
- Serpell J. A., 1996, In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships.
- 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01010-6 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853003321618864 · DOI · Paper page
- Serpell J. A., 2011, In The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology, 297
- Sherman G. D., 2009, Emotion, 9, 282, 10.1037/a0014904 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/1745691610369336 · DOI · Paper page
- Westgarth C., 2010, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 3704, 10.3390/ijerph7103704 · DOI
- Wynne C. D. L., 2004, Nature
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Similarities between obesity in pets and children: The addiction model
Pretlow, R. A., & Corbee, R. J. (2016) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114516002774 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, E. S., Moore, A., McAinsh, P., Symonds, E., McCune, S., & Bradshaw, J. W. S.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Behavioural Biology, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK
- WALTHAM® Centre for Pet Nutrition, Leicestershire, UK
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 499-512
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review