Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sociality Motivation and Anthropomorphic Thinking about Pets

Paul, Elizabeth S., Moore, Anna, McAinsh, Pippa, Symonds, Emma, McCune, Sandra, Bradshaw, John W. S.·2014·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Sociality motivation, the need to feel socially connected with others, has been proposed as an important determinant of individual variation in anthropomorphic thinking. Specifically, it has been suggested that people who are socially isolated or disconnected will tend to infer more human-like mental states in animals and other nonhuman agents (computers, robots, metaphysical beings, etc.), than those who have higher levels of contact with other people. We investigated this hypothesis in a community-based sample of cat and dog owners, measuring degree of anthropomorphism by asking them which emotions they believed their pet was capable of experiencing, how likely they were to rely on it for social support, and how attached they were to it. Structural measures of social disconnection, including the number of other adults living in the household and the number of social contacts outside the home, were not generally associated with the tendency to think anthropomorphically about pets. However, owners living in households with no children (under the age of 16 years) reported higher levels of attachment to their pet than did those with children (B = 1.678, p < 0.001), and felt that they derived relatively more social support from it than they did from humans (F(1,244) = 4.997, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.020). In addition, a trait-based indicator of social disconnection (self-reported anxiety about human social relationships) was associated with a heightened tendency for owners to re…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303714x14023922798192

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Adamelli S., 2005, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 94, 89, 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.003 · DOI
  2. 10.2752/175303710X12627079939143 · DOI
  3. Antonacopoulos N. M. D., 2010, Society & Animals, 18, 379, 10.1163/156853010X524334 · DOI
  4. Archer J., 2011, In The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology, 281
  5. 10.1023/A:1005653411471 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.11.009 · DOI
  7. Bonas S., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 209
  8. Boyce P., 1989, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23, 341, 10.1177/000486748902300301 · DOI
  9. Bradshaw J. W. S., 2011, In Defense of Dogs: Why Dogs Need Our Understanding.
  10. Bradshaw J. W. S., 2007, Animal Welfare, 149
  11. Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Limond, J. 1997. Attachment to cats and its relationship with emotional support: A cross cultural study. Paper presented at the ISAZ annual conference, Boston, USA, July 24–25, 1997.
  12. Bradshaw J. W. S., 2001, In Proceedings of the 9th International IAHAIO Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  13. Bradshaw J. W. S., 2010, Animal Welfare, 107
  14. Casey R. A., 2008, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 196, 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/13284201003662800 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/00224540903368533 · DOI
  17. Collis, D., Bradshaw, J. W. S. and Cook, S. E. 1998. Effects of reproductive status on women's “attachment” to their cats. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Animal Interactions, Prague, Czech Republic, September 10–12, 1998.
  18. 10.1192/bjp.176.4.379 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Crawford E. K., 2006, Anthrozoös, 19, 98, 10.2752/089279306785593757 · DOI
  20. 10.1300/J052v15n03_02 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71, 10.1080/02699930244000444 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J · DOI · Paper page
  23. Enders-Slegers M-J., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 237
  24. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fidler M., 1996, Anthrozoös, 9, 196, 10.2752/089279396787001356 · DOI
  26. 10.2752/089279307X245473 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00125-5 · DOI
  28. Haselton M. G., 2006, Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 47, 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Herzog H., 2010, Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight about Animals.
  30. Himsworth C. G., 2013, Anthrozoös, 26, 295, 10.2752/175303713X13636846944448 · DOI
  31. 10.2752/089279307780216650 · DOI
  32. Kiesler S., 2006, Anthrozoös, 19, 335, 10.2752/089279306785415448 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/07370010701836286 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.005 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0265407507087958 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/a0014979 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2752/175303711X12998632257585 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Mithen S., 1996, The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science.
  39. 10.1080/02699930701273716 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1177/1403494809344358 · DOI
  41. Paul E. S., 2000, In Companion Animals & Us: Exploring the Relationships between People & Pets, 168
  42. 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Sanefuji W., 2007, Journal of Ethology, 25, 249, 10.1007/s10164-006-0018-8 · DOI
  44. Serpell J. A., 1996, In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships.
  45. 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01010-6 · DOI
  46. 10.1163/156853003321618864 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Serpell J. A., 2011, In The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology, 297
  48. Sherman G. D., 2009, Emotion, 9, 282, 10.1037/a0014904 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.011 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/1745691610369336 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Westgarth C., 2010, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 3704, 10.3390/ijerph7103704 · DOI
  52. Wynne C. D. L., 2004, Nature

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Paul, E. S., Moore, A., McAinsh, P., Symonds, E., McCune, S., & Bradshaw, J. W. S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Behavioural Biology, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK
  • WALTHAM® Centre for Pet Nutrition, Leicestershire, UK
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2014-12
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
499-512
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
33
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review