The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in E-Commerce Transactions: An Experimental Study
Abstract
Despite the importance of online product recommendations (OPRs) in e-commerce transactions, there is still little understanding about how different recommendation sources affect consumers' beliefs and behavior, and whether these effects are additive, complementary, or rivals for different types of products. This study investigates the differential effects of provider recommendations (PRs) and consumer reviews (CRs) on the instrumental, affective, and trusting dimensions of consumer beliefs and shows how these beliefs ultimately influence continued OPR usage and product purchase intentions. This study tests a conceptual model linking PRs and CRs to four consumer beliefs (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived affective quality, and trust) in two different product settings (search products versus experience products). Results of an experimental study show that users of PRs express significantly higher perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use than users of CRs, while users of CRs express higher trusting beliefs and perceived affective quality than users of PRs, resulting in different effect mechanisms toward OPR reuse and purchase intentions in e-commerce transactions. Further, CRs were found to elicit higher perceived usefulness, trusting beliefs, and perceived affective quality for experience goods, while PRs were found to unfold higher effects on all of these variables for search goods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 1×
“, recommendation agents or E-Mail systems) have been found to generate cognitive and affective arousal in IT users, thus showing both hedonic and utilitarian value of IS [28].”
BackgroundCore affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113 · cited 1×
“It is considered to be free of any implied cognitive structures and at the heart of emotion, mood, and any other emotionally charged events [82].”
Background
Cited by
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008 · Cited by 443
How do product recommendations affect impulse buying? An empirical study on WeChat social commerce
Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Pan, Z. (2019) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.09.002 · Cited by 370
Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users
Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2015.17 · Cited by 223
Thumbs Up, Sales Up? The Contingent Effect of Facebook Likes on Sales Performance in Social Commerce
Lee, K., Lee, B., & Oh, W. (2015) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1138372 · Cited by 181
Antecedents of mobile app usage among smartphone users
Kim, S. C., Yoon, D., & Han, E. K. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.951065 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Benlian, A., Titah, R., & Hess, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-272
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2084243060
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 62.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in E-Commerce Transactions: An Experimental Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/mis0742-1222290107
- The paper
- Benlian, A., Titah, R., & Hess, T. (2012). Differential Effects of Provider Recommendations and Consumer Reviews in E-Commerce Transactions: An Experimental Study. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222290107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.