Cited by 223Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionInformation and Cyber Security

Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users

Open access
Söllner, Matthias, Hoffmann, Axel, Leimeister, Jan Marco·2016·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Technology acceptance research has shown that trust is an important factor fostering use of information systems (IS). As a result, numerous IS researchers have studied factors that build trust in I...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2015.17

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no commonly accepted definition of trust but rather a need for contextualized trust conceptualizations.

    “As a result of the plurality of perspectives on this concept, there is no commonly accepted definition of trust (Lansing and Sunyaev 2016;Söllner et al. 2016) but rather a need for contextualized trust conceptualizations (Jarvenpaa et al. 2004).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Söllner et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Söllner, Matthias
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2016-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
274-287
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W2257140431
Cited by
223
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
trust relationships, information system users, technology acceptance, trust in information systems, user trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review