Cited by 448Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology and AssessmentEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment

Open access
Owan, Valentine Joseph, Abang, Kinsgley Bekom, Idika, Delight Omoji, Etta, Eugene Onor, Bassey, Bassey Asuquo·2023·Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming various industries, and education is no exception. Rapid advancements in AI technology have become essential for educators and educational assessment professionals to enhance teaching and learning experiences. AI-powered educational assessment tools provide numerous benefits, including improving the accuracy and efficiency of assessments, generating personalized feedback for students, and enabling teachers to adapt their teaching strategies to meet the unique needs of each student. Therefore, AI has the potential to revolutionize the way education is delivered and assessed, ultimately leading to better educational outcomes for students. This paper explores the various applications of AI tools in educational measurement and assessment. Specifically, it discusses the integration of large language AI models in classroom assessment, in specific areas such as test purpose determination and specification, developing, test blueprint, test item generation/development, preparation of test instructions, item assembly/selection, test administration, test scoring, interpretation of test results, test analysis/appraisal, and reporting. It analyses the role of teachers in AI-based assessment and the challenges of using AI-powered tools in educational assessment. Finally, the paper presents strategies to address these challenges and enhance the effectiveness of AI in educational assessment. In conclusion, using AI in educational assessment has benefits and limitations. As such, educators, policymakers, and stakeholders must work together to develop strategies that maximize the benefits of AI in educational assessment while mitigating the associated risks. The application of AI in educational assessment can ultimately transform education, improve learning outcomes, and equip students with the skills needed to succeed in the 21st century.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This conceptual paper reviews how artificial intelligence (AI) tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), can be applied across the stages of educational measurement and assessment, from test purpose determination through scoring, interpretation, and reporting. It argues that AI can improve assessment accuracy, efficiency, and personalization, but must be paired with teacher oversight and ethical safeguards to address bias, transparency, privacy, and equity concerns.

Key findings

  • The paper catalogues 24 applications of AI in educational measurement and assessment, including personalized learning, intelligent tutoring systems (e.g., ALEKS, Carnegie Learning, Knewton), automated grading (e.g., Turnitin), predictive analytics, NLP tools (e.g., Grammarly), automated essay scoring (e-rater, Grammarly, Turnitin), computer-based testing platforms (ExamSoft, JAMB CBT, ProProfs, Questionmark), gamification, VR/AR, and plagiarism detection.
  • LLMs (e.g., BARD, BERT, ChatGPT, RoBERTa, T5, XLNet) are described as useful at every stage of the test development cycle: test purpose determination/specification, blueprint development, item generation, instruction preparation, item assembly/selection, administration, scoring, interpretation, analysis/appraisal, and reporting.
  • One cited experiment (Nasution, 2023) found that AI-generated questions were "satisfactorily clear, acceptable and favorable to students, and relevant to the subject matter."
  • The paper identifies 16 challenges (e.g., lack of stakeholder participation, lack of transparency, bias, limited scope for higher-order and affective/psychomotor domains, cost, resistance to change, technical difficulties) and 9 strategies to address them (e.g., transparent/ethical algorithms, personalized assessment, educator training, human oversight, data security under FERPA).
  • Ten teacher roles in AI-based assessment are outlined, including designing assessment, providing context, interpreting results, ensuring ethical use, individualizing instruction, and ensuring accuracy.

Methods

  • Design: Conceptual/theoretical review paper; the authors state the study "did not require an ethical approval since it is based on existing literature."
  • Data: No primary data collected; the paper synthesizes existing literature and cites prior studies (e.g., Joshua, 2012; Nasution, 2023; Luckin & Cukurova, 2019).
  • Analysis: Narrative discussion organized around applications of AI, LLM use across assessment stages, teacher roles, challenges, and mitigation strategies. No systematic review protocol, search strategy, or quantitative synthesis is reported.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: The authors note that AI-based assessment "is not a panacea and should not replace human judgment entirely," that AI algorithms can be biased and may not consider non-cognitive factors, and that some students may be uncomfortable being assessed by machines. Data availability is stated as available on request from the corresponding author.
  • Evident from the text: The paper is a non-systematic conceptual review with no empirical data, sample, or formal search methodology; its claims about AI capabilities are largely illustrative and cite vendor examples rather than evaluated outcomes. The only quantitative-adjacent evidence cited is a single study (Nasution, 2023) reported without effect sizes or sample details.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29333/ejmste/13428

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    The integration of AI in teaching effectively realized learner-centered learning.

    “The integration of AI in teaching effectively realized learner-centered learning (Huang, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    AI-powered assessment tools can analyze student responses to assignments and provide personalized feedback to help students identify areas of strengths and weaknesses.

    “For example, AI-powered assessment tools can analyze student responses to assignments and provide personalized feedback to help students identify areas of strengths and weaknesses (Nazaretsky et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nazaretsky et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    AI-powered tools and applications improve educational measurement, including testing, assessment, and evaluation.

    “AI-powered tools and applications improve educational measurement, including testing, assessment, and evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    AI can help create personalized learning plans for individual students based on their learning progress, strengths, and weaknesses.

    “AI can help create personalized learning plans for individual students based on their learning progress, strengths, and weaknesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    AI has been found to play a crucial role in motivating students.

    “AI has been found to play a crucial role in motivating students (Lin et al., 2021;Xia et al., 2022), raising their engagement levels (Huang et al., 2023a;Nazari et al., 2021), learning interest (Hou et al., 2022), learners' interaction (Karsenti, 2019), anxiety reduction (Hawes & Arya, 2023;Ren, 2020), prediction of students' future outcomes (Kumar, 2019;Luo et al., 2022) and academic performance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Xia et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 74
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI-powered educational assessment tools provide benefits including improving the accuracy and efficiency of assessments, generating personalized feedback for students, and enabling teachers to adapt their teaching strategies to meet individual student needs.

    “AI-powered educational assessment tools provide numerous benefits, including improving the accuracy and efficiency of assessments, generating personalized feedback for students, and enabling teachers to adapt their teaching strategies to meet the unique needs of each student.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The development of AI-powered tools and applications has revolutionized the field of education by providing educators with valuable insights into student performance, learning outcomes, and instructional effectiveness.

    “Therefore, the development of AI-powered tools and applications has revolutionized the field of education by providing educators with valuable insights into student performance, learning outcomes, and instructional effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Using AI in educational assessment has benefits and limitations.

    “In conclusion, using AI in educational assessment has benefits and limitations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI-powered grading tools can analyze students' essays and provide feedback on grammar, structure, and content, reducing teachers' time grading assignments.

    “For example, AI-powered grading tools can analyze students essays and provide feedback on grammar, structure, and content, reducing teachers' time grading assignments (Huang et al., 2023b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2023b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI-powered tools can help identify students at risk of falling behind or who would benefit from additional assistance or remediation.

    “AI-powered tools can also help identify students at risk of falling behind or benefit from additional assistance or remediation (Delgado et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Delgado et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The use of AI in teaching and learning has limitations.

    “Nevertheless, the use of AI in teaching and learning has its limitations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    User privacy is a significant concern regarding AI use.

    “Moreover, the concern regarding user privacy is another significant matter (Elliott & Soifer, 2022;Hu & Min, 2023;Saura et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Elliott & Soifer, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hu & Min, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Saura et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    AI-powered tools and applications are now being used in many industries, including education, to enhance the quality of services provided to students and teachers.

    “AI-powered tools and applications are now being used in many industries (Suh & Ahn, 2022), including education, to enhance the quality of services provided to students and teachers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Suh & Ahn, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI can help create and curate learning materials tailored to individual student's needs and learning styles.

    “AI can help create and curate learning materials tailored to individual student's needs and learning styles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can generate test items that align with specific learning objectives and outcomes.

    “LLMs can also generate test items that align with specific learning objectives and outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    A test blueprint is essential to ensure that a test accurately measures the intended learning outcomes.

    “A test blueprint is essential to ensure that a test accurately measures the intended learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Using LLMs in test administration can improve the testing experience's quality and increase test results' accuracy and reliability.

    “Using LLMs in test administration can improve the testing experience's quality and increase test results' accuracy and reliability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can generate distractors or incorrect options for multiple-choice questions, ensuring they are plausible but incorrect.

    “LLMs can also generate distractors or incorrect options for multiple-choice questions, ensuring they are plausible but incorrect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can assist with translating test items into different languages, ensuring that the translated items accurately convey the intended meaning of the original items.

    “Furthermore, they can assist with translating test items into different languages, ensuring that the translated items accurately convey the intended meaning of the original items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI can identify students' learning needs by analyzing data from multiple sources such as assessments, homework, and quizzes and provide targeted feedback.

    “AI can identify students' learning needs by analyzing data from multiple sources such as assessments, homework, and quizzes and provide targeted feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One of the key features of LLMs is their ability to understand and conversationally generate text.

    “One of the key features of LLMs is their ability to understand and conversationally generate text (Kasneci et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kasneci et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can help ensure that test instructions are unambiguous.

    “Regarding testing instructions, LLMs can help ensure that the instructions are unambiguous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can assist in developing test blueprints by analyzing the content areas and the levels of instructional objectives in the cognitive domain.

    “They can assist in developing test blueprints by analyzing the content areas and the levels of instructional objectives in the cognitive domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can analyze course content and other relevant sources to generate a large pool of potential test items.

    “These models can analyze course content and other relevant sources to generate a large pool of potential test items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    There are currently no methods available to distinguish between content generated by AI tools and content written by humans.

    “This is because there are currently no methods available to distinguish between content generated by such a tool and those written by humans (Tovani-Palone, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tovani-Palone, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can be extremely useful in the preparation of test instructions.

    “LLMs can be extremely useful in the preparation of test instructions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can be useful in developing essay test items.

    “Moreover, LLMs can also be useful in developing essay test items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can analyze the coherence and consistency of test items to ensure that they assess the intended construct or skill fairly and validly.

    “LLMs can analyze the coherence and consistency of test items to ensure that they assess the intended construct or skill fairly and validly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LLMs are part of the family of generative models, meaning they can generate new text based on patterns and structures learned from training data.

    “LLMs are part of the family of generative models (Ingraham et al., 2019), which means they can generate new text based on the patterns and structures learned from the data used to train them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ingraham et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI can help transcribe and translate lectures and other educational materials, making them accessible to a wider range of students.

    “AI can help transcribe and translate lectures and other educational materials, making them accessible to a wider range of students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    LLMs can be useful in the test specification of purpose by analyzing the course content and identifying key topics or concepts that need to be assessed.

    “Since purpose of a test is built from the course content or subject (Joshua, 2012), LLMs can be useful in the test specification of purpose by analyzing the course content and identifying key topics or concepts that need to be assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joshua, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can help ensure the instructions are culturally appropriate and sensitive to different audiences.

    “Moreover, LLMs can help ensure the instructions are culturally appropriate and sensitive to different audiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI-powered NLP tools can help students learn languages and improve their writing skills by providing grammar, spelling, and punctuation feedback.

    “AI-powered NLP tools can help students learn languages and improve their writing skills by providing grammar, spelling, and punctuation feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can be used to support remote proctoring for electronically taken tests.

    “LLMs can be used to support remote proctoring for electronically taken tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can provide a more engaging and interactive testing experience.

    “Additionally, LLMs can provide a more engaging and interactive testing experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    By analyzing relevant texts, LLMs can assist in identifying the most relevant and appropriate items from the item pool based on the test blueprint and objectives.

    “By analyzing relevant texts, LLMs can assist in identifying the most relevant and appropriate items from the item pool based on the test blueprint and objectives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can assist in creating relevant, clear, specific, and unambiguous test items.

    “LLMs can assist in creating relevant, clear, specific, and unambiguous test items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can assist in developing objective test items such as multiple-choice, true/false, or matching questions.

    “LLMs can also assist in developing objective test items such as multiple-choice, true/false, or matching questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some main purposes of testing revolve around evaluating teachers' effectiveness and students' motivation, judging students' learning proficiency, their acquisition of essential skills and knowledge, diagnosing students' learning difficulties, ranking students' learning achievement, and measuring their growth over time.

    “To Joshua (2012), some of the main purposes of testing revolve around evaluating teachers' effectiveness and students' motivation, judging students' learning proficiency, their acquisition of essential skills and knowledge, diagnosing students' learning difficulties, ranking students' learning achievement, and measuring their growth over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joshua, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One of the most significant benefits of LLMs in test administration is their ability to provide immediate feedback to test-takers.

    “One of the most significant benefits of LLMs in test administration is their ability to provide immediate feedback to test-takers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In an experiment, questions generated by AI were satisfactorily clear, acceptable and favorable to students, and relevant to the subject matter.

    “In an experiment, a study found that questions generated by AI were satisfactorily clear, acceptable and favorable to students, and relevant to the subject matter (Nasution, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nasution, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can help with the localization of test instructions.

    “LLMs can also help with the localization of test instructions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Concerns have been raised regarding plagiarism detection in content produced by ChatGPT and the challenge of distinguishing between factual and fictional text generated.

    “Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding plagiarism detection in content produced by ChatGPT, as well as the challenge of distinguishing between factual and fictional text generated (Chatterjee & Dethlefs, 2023;King & ChatGPT, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chatterjee & Dethlefs, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites King & ChatGPT, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LLMs are designed to process and interpret vast quantities of text data.

    “By leveraging NLP principles and machine learning principles, LLMs are designed to process and interpret vast quantities of text data (Dergaa et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dergaa et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI-powered virtual assistants can help students with administrative tasks such as scheduling, reminders, and task management.

    “AI-powered virtual assistants can help students with administrative tasks such as scheduling, reminders, and task management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can monitor test-taking behavior during the test administration to detect unusual patterns that might suggest cheating or other misconduct.

    “LLMs can monitor test-taking behavior during the test administration to detect unusual patterns that might suggest cheating or other misconduct.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can help to ensure that test items are fair and unbiased.

    “Additionally, LLMs can help to ensure that test items are fair and unbiased, which is essential in ensuring that the test results accurately reflect students' knowledge and skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    AI can help automate the grading process, saving time for teachers and providing students with immediate feedback on their assignments.

    “AI can help automate the grading process, saving time for teachers and providing students with immediate feedback on their assignments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI-powered tutoring systems can provide personalized support and feedback to students.

    “tutoring systems can provide personalized support and feedback to students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can help ensure the security of tests by providing features such as password protection, encryption, and monitoring tools to prevent cheating and unauthorized access to test content.

    “Furthermore, LLMs can help ensure the security of tests by providing features such as password protection, encryption, and monitoring tools to prevent cheating and unauthorized access to test content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can play a significant role in various stages of the educational assessment process, such as test planning, item generation, preparation of test instruction, item assembly/selection, test administration, test scoring, test analysis, interpretation, appraisal, reporting, and follow-up.

    “LLMs can play a significant role in various stages of educational assessment process, such as test planning, item generation, preparation of test instruction, item assembly/selection, test administration, test scoring, test analysis, interpretation, appraisal, reporting, and followup.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can provide more accurate and consistent scoring of tests than human graders, because they are not subject to biases or errors arising from fatigue, distraction, or personal preferences.

    “LLMs can provide more accurate and consistent scoring of tests than human graders, as they are not subject to biases or errors arising from fatigue, distraction, or personal preferences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI tools can customize learning experiences, boost teacher productivity, and heighten student engagement.

    “Tools and systems based on AI have the potential to customize learning experiences, boost the productivity of teachers, and heighten student engagement (Mena-Guacas et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mena-Guacas et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can be very useful in the test assembly process.

    “LLMs can be very useful in the test assembly process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can generate human-like text and are designed to understand and generate text in a contextually relevant and coherent way.

    “LLMs can generate human-like text and are designed to understand and generate text in a contextually relevant and coherent way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can assist in delivering tests to many test-takers simultaneously, which can be particularly useful in high-stakes testing situations.

    “LLMs can also assist in delivering tests to many test-takers simultaneously, which can be particularly useful in high-stakes testing situations such as college entrance exams or professional certifications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can be useful in various ways during test administration to ensure that all students have a fair chance to manifest the desired behavior being measured and to minimize cheating.

    “LLMs can be useful in various ways during test administration to ensure that all students have a fair chance to manifest the desired behavior being measured and to minimize cheating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can help to ensure that test items are valid, reliable, and relevant to the educational issues being addressed.

    “Furthermore, LLMs can help to ensure that test items are valid, reliable, and relevant to the educational issues being addressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can aid in developing a test blueprint by electronically analyzing relevant texts to identify key concepts, skills, and knowledge areas that need to be assessed and help determine appropriate weightage or distribution of items.

    “aid in developing a test blueprint by electronically analyzing relevant texts to identify the key concepts, skills, and knowledge areas that need to be assessed and help determine the appropriate weightage or distribution of these items in the test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can be used to create adaptive tests that adjust the difficulty level of questions based on students' responses.

    “Moreover, LLMs can be used to create adaptive tests that adjust the difficulty level of questions based on students' responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can be programmed to recognize and account for common mistakes or misconceptions made by students, which can help identify areas where further teaching or support may be needed.

    “They can also be programmed to recognize and account for common mistakes or misconceptions made by students, which can help to identify areas, where further teaching or support may be needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Developers of AI have limited knowledge about learning sciences and insufficient pedagogical understanding for the successful integration of AI into teaching.

    “According to Luckin and Cukurova (2019), developers of AI have limited knowledge about learning sciences and insufficient pedagogical understanding for the successful integration of AI into teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Luckin and Cukurova (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI algorithms may not consider non-cognitive factors that can influence academic performance.

    “AI algorithms can be biased and may not consider non-cognitive factors that can influence academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating AI-powered assessment tools with existing systems can be a challenge.

    “Integrating AI-powered assessment tools with existing systems can be a challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It is essential to take teachers' opinions, past experiences, and expectations into account to ensure the successful integration of AI in schools.

    “therefore, it is essential to take their opinions, past experiences, and expectations into account to ensure the successful integration of AI in schools (Holmes et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holmes et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can provide personalized feedback and recommendations based on individual test results, which can help guide further learning and development.

    “LLMs can provide personalized feedback and recommendations based on individual test results, which can help to guide further learning and development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can use student responses to specific items to highlight items that may be too difficult, too easy, or poorly worded.

    “LLMs can use student responses to specific items to highlight areas, where the item may be too difficult, too easy, or poorly worded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs have the potential to be valuable tools in test appraisals.

    “LLMs have the potential to be valuable tools in test appraisals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI-based assessment can identify areas of weakness and strength, allowing educators to tailor their teaching methods to individual needs.

    “It can also identify areas of weakness and strength, allowing educators to tailor their teaching methods to individual needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI tools, due to their inanimate nature, may not be well-suited to measure and grade affective attributes and psychomotor skills.

    “Furthermore, AI-tools, due to their inanimate nature, may not be well-suited to measure and grade affective attributes (such as students' feelings, attitude, interest and anxiety) and psychomotor skills (such as driving, footballing, cooking, weaving, laboratory work, and dancing, among others).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can generate comprehensive test reports summarizing results, including descriptive statistics, performance profiles, and graphical representations.

    “By analyzing the assessment data, LLMs can generate comprehensive reports summarizing the test results, including descriptive statistics, performance profiles, and graphical representations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Some students may be uncomfortable with being assessed by machines, which could impact their motivation and engagement.

    “Additionally, some students may be uncomfortable with being assessed by machines, which could impact their motivation and engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In educational assessment, teachers still have a critical role in ensuring that AI is appropriately used for measurement and evaluation purposes.

    “Therefore, in educational assessment, teachers still have a critical role in ensuring that AI is appropriately used for measurement and evaluation purposes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Focus on standardization in AI-powered assessment tools may not account for the diversity of students' learning experiences and backgrounds, leading to a one-size-fits-all approach to education.

    “But focus on standardization may not account for the diversity of students' learning experiences and backgrounds, leading to a onesize-fits-all approach to education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    The role of teachers in AI-based assessments is still critical and cannot be undermined.

    “However, the role of teachers in AI-based assessments is still critical and cannot be undermined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dillenbourg (2016)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hrastinski et al. (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs trained on a large corpus of text can be fine-tuned to provide scores for open-ended questions or essays based on criteria such as content, language use, and organization.

    “Training LLMs on a large corpus of text can be fine-tuned to provide scores for open-ended questions or essays based on various criteria, such as content, language use, and organization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can provide a more detailed and nuanced analysis of test results than traditional methods.

    “Apart from their ability to automate the interpretation of a large volume of test results in record time, LLMs can provide a more detailed and nuanced analysis of test results than traditional methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can aid in interpreting assessment results by providing insights into the meaning and implications of the data.

    “LLMs can aid in interpreting assessment results by providing insights into the meaning and implications of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Teachers are highly important in AI-based teaching.

    “Teachers are highly important in AI-based teaching (Seufert et al., 2020);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seufert et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The use of AI in educational assessment can lead to a lack of human interaction in the assessment process, which can be detrimental to students' learning experiences.

    “The use of AI in educational assessment can lead to a lack of human interaction in the assessment process, which can be detrimental to students' learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The use of AI in educational assessment raises ethical concerns such as issues around data privacy and ownership, as well as concerns around using technology to replace human educators.

    “The use of AI in educational assessment raises ethical concerns, such as issues around data privacy and ownership, as well as concerns around using technology to replace human educators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can identify potential sources of confusion or misunderstanding in test questions, such as multiple word or phrase meanings.

    “LLMs can also identify potential sources of confusion or misunderstanding in test questions, such as multiple word or phrase meanings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can be employed to analyze assessment data, including item statistics, item difficulty, discrimination indices, and other performance metrics.

    “LLMs can be employed to analyze assessment data, including item statistics, item difficulty, discrimination indices, and other performance metrics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without adequate training, educators may be unable to use AI-powered assessment tools effectively, leading to inaccurate assessments.

    “Without adequate training, educators may be unable to use the tools effectively, leading to inaccurate assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can be programmed to recognize patterns or trends in scores that may not be immediately apparent to human graders or analysts.

    “They can be programmed to recognize patterns or trends in the scores that may not be immediately apparent to human graders or analysts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can provide more detailed feedback and analysis of test scores than traditional scoring methods.

    “LLMs can provide more detailed feedback and analysis of test scores than traditional scoring methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
81 of 81
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Strategies can be developed that maximize the benefits of AI in educational assessment while mitigating the associated risks.

    “educators, policymakers, and stakeholders must work together to develop strategies that maximize the benefits of AI in educational assessment while mitigating the associated risks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI-based assessments have been gaining popularity in recent years.

    “AI-based assessments have been gaining popularity in recent years due to their ability to provide a quick and efficient evaluation of student learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI systems are only as good as the data on which they are trained.

    “This is because AI systems are only as good as the data on which they are trained.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical concerns such as data privacy and algorithmic bias, alongside broader issues such as digital equity and staff training, shape adoption of AI and VR in higher education.

    “Ethical concerns such as data privacy and algorithmic bias, alongside broader issues such as digital equity and staff training, also shape adoption in higher education (Owan et al., 2023; OECD, 2024).”

    From Intelligent Immersion: AI and VR Tools for Next-Generation Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Owan et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Seufert citation year differs from the reference entry

    Minor

    The text cites Seufert et al. as a 2020 work, while the corresponding reference entry gives 2021.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Bassey, B. A., Ubi, I. O., Anagbogu, G. E., & Owan, V. J. (2020). Permutation of UTME multiple-choice test items on performance in use of English and mathematics among prospective higher education students. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 6(4), 483-493. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.64.483.493 · DOI
  2. Chatterjee, J., & Dethlefs, N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide ... and even your worst enemy. Patterns, 4(1), 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2018). Measuring the impact of emerging technologies in education: A pragmatic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_81-1 · DOI
  4. Delgado, H. O. K., de Azevedo Fay, A., Sebastiany, M. J., & Silva, A. D. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 11(2), e38749-e38749. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2020.2.38749 · DOI
  5. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dillenbourg, P. (2016). The evolution of research on digital education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z · DOI · Paper page
  7. Elliott, D., & Soifer, E. (2022). AI technologies, privacy, and security. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 826737. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.826737 · DOI
  8. Hawes, D., & Arya, A. (2023). Technology solutions to reduce anxiety and increase cognitive availability in students. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(2), 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3239985 · DOI
  9. Hou, J., Li, Z., & Liu, G. (2022). Macro education approach to improve learning interest under the background of artificial intelligence. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 4295887. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4295887 · DOI
  10. Hu, Y., & Min, H. K. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in service: The “watching-eye” effect and privacy concerns. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 110, 103437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103437 · DOI
  11. Huang, S.-P. (2018). Effects of using artificial intelligence teaching system for environmental education on environmental knowledge and attitude. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3277-3284. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91248 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023b). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009 · DOI
  13. Ingraham, J., Garg, V., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2019). Generative models for graph-based protein design. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. Alché-Buc, E. Fox, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates, Inc.
  14. Joshua, M. T. (2012). Fundamentals of tests and measurement in education. University of Calabar Press.
  15. Karsenti, T. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: The urgent need to prepare teachers for tomorrow’s schools. Formation et Profession [Education and Profession], 27(1), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.18162/fp.2019.a166 · DOI
  16. Khan, I., Ahmad, A. R., Jabeur, N., & Mahdi, M. N. (2021). An artificial intelligence approach to monitor student performance and devise preventive measures. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00161-y · DOI
  17. King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kumar, N. S. (2019). Implementation of artificial intelligence in imparting education and evaluating student performance. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(01), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2019.1.001 · DOI
  19. Lin, P. Y., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2021). Modelling the structural relationship among primary students’ motivation to learn artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861 · DOI
  21. Luo, Y., Han, X., & Zhang, C. (2022). Prediction of learning outcomes with a machine learning algorithm based on online learning behavior data in blended courses. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09749-6 · DOI
  22. Mena-Guacas, A. F., Urueña Rodríguez, J. A., Santana Trujillo, D. M., Gómez-Galán, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep428. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13123 · DOI
  23. Mohamed, M. Z. B., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N. B., Sabri, N. B. M., Mahmud, M. K. H. B., & Baharuddin, S. N. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12132 · DOI
  24. Nasution, N. E. A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to create biology multiple choice questions for higher education. Agricultural and Environmental Education, 2(1), em002. https://doi.org/10.29333/agrenvedu/13071 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Owan, V. J. (2020). Computer-administered testing practice in higher education in an era of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related diseases outbreaks. In V. C. Emeribe, L. U. Akah, O. A. Dada, D. A. Alawa, & B. A. Akuegwu (Eds.), Multidisciplinary issues in health, human kinetics and general education practices (pp. 429-442). University of Calabar Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906923 · DOI
  27. Owan, V. J., Duruamaku-dim, J. U., & Eneje, S. (2019). Mode of test administration, birth variables, and students’ academic achievement in mathematics in Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. Prestige Journal of Counselling Psychology, 2(2), 60-77.
  28. Owan, V. J., Owan, M. V., & Ogabor, J. O. (2023). Sitting arrangement and malpractice behaviors among higher education test-takers: On educational assessment in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.5 · DOI
  29. Papapicco, C. (2020). Google mini: Italian example of artificial pro-sociality. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202015. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7995 · DOI
  30. Ren, X. (2020). Artificial intelligence and depression: How AI powered chatbots in virtual reality games may reduce anxiety and depression levels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice, 3(1), 48-58.
  31. Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2022). Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679 · DOI
  32. Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552 · DOI
  33. Suh, W., & Ahn, S. (2022). Development and validation of a scale measuring student attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221100463. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221100463 · DOI
  34. Tovani-Palone, M. R. (2023). Some challenges and limitations of using ChatGPT in medicine. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 20(5), em503. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/13263 · DOI
  35. Vasconcelos, M. A. R., & dos Santos, R. P. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: A case study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313 · DOI
  36. Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Educational Foundations, University of Calabar, Calabar, Cross River State, NIGERIA
  • University of Calabar (NG)
Venue
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Publisher
Modestum Ltd
Published
2023-08-01
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
em2307
ISSN
  • 1305-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1305-8223
OpenAlex
W4381511236
Cited by
448
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 13
FWCI
104.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, large language models, test scoring, test administration, test interpretation, personalized feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review