Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-AZD4694 (NAV4694) for β-Amyloid Imaging in Aging and Dementia

Open access
Rowe, Christopher C., Pejoska, Svetlana, Mulligan, Rachel S., Jones, Gareth, Chan, J. Gordon, Svensson, Samuel, Cselényi, Zsolt, Masters, Colin L., Villemagne, Victor L.·2013·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

UNLABELLED: (11)C-Pittsburgh compound-B ((11)C-PiB) is the benchmark radiotracer for imaging of β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque in Alzheimer disease (AD). (18)F-labeled Aβ tracers subsequently developed for clinical use show higher nonspecific white matter binding and, in some cases, lower cortical binding in AD that could lead to less accurate interpretation of scans. We compared the cortical and white matter binding of a new (18)F-labeled Aβ tracer, (18)F-AZD4694 (recently renamed NAV4694), with (11)C-PiB in the same subjects. METHODS: Forty-five participants underwent PET imaging with (11)C-PiB and (18)F-AZD4694 (25 healthy elderly controls [HCs], 10 subjects with mild cognitive impairment, 7 subjects with probable AD, and 3 subjects with probable frontotemporal dementia). Images were coregistered so that region-of-interest placement was identical on both scans, and standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) using the cerebellar cortex as a reference region were calculated between 40 and 70 min after injection for both tracers. RESULTS: (18)F-AZD4694 showed reversible binding kinetics similar to (11)C-PiB, reaching an apparent steady state at 50 min after injection. Both radiotracers showed a similar dynamic range of neocortical SUVR (1.1-3.3 and 1.0-3.2 SUVR for (11)C-PiB and (18)F-AZD4694, respectively) and identical low nonspecific white matter binding, with frontal cortex-to-white matter ratios of 0.7 ± 0.2 and 1.3 ± 0.2 for both radiotracers in HCs and AD subjects, respectively. There was an excellent linear correlation between (11)C-PiB and (18)F-AZD4694 neocortical SUVR (slope of 0.95, r = 0.99, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: (18)F-AZD4694 displays imaging characteristics nearly identical to those of (11)C-PiB. The low white matter and high cortical binding in AD indicate that this tracer is well suited to both clinical and research use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.112.114785

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Rowe, C. C., Pejoska, S., Mulligan, R. S., Jones, G., Chan, J. G., Svensson, S., Cselényi, Z., Masters, C. L., & Villemagne, V. L.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2013-04-10
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
880-886
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
OpenAlex
W2116124089
Cited by
191
References
11
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Head-to-Head Comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-AZD4694 (NAV4694) for β-Amyloid Imaging in Aging and Dementia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.112.114785
The paper
Rowe, C. C., Pejoska, S., Mulligan, R. S., Jones, G., Chan, J. G., Svensson, S., Cselényi, Z., Masters, C. L., & Villemagne, V. L. (2013). Head-to-Head Comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-AZD4694 (NAV4694) for β-Amyloid Imaging in Aging and Dementia. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.114785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.