Cited by 10Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsGender Diversity and Inequality

Descriptive norms and gender diversity: Reactance from men

Open access
Paryavi, Maliheh, Bohnet, Iris, Van Geen, Alexandra·2019·Journal of Behavioral Public Administration

Abstract

Descriptive norms provide social information on others’ typical behaviors and have been shown to lead to prescriptive outcomes by “nudging” individuals towards norm compliance in numerous settings. This paper examines whether descriptive norms lead to prescriptive outcomes in the gender domain. We examine whether such social information can influence the gender distribution of candidates selected by employers in a hiring context. We conduct a series of laboratory experiments where ‘employers’ decide how many male and female ‘employees’ they want to hire for male- and female-typed tasks and examine whether employers are more likely to hire more of one gender when informed that others have done so as well. In this set-up descriptive norms do not have prescriptive effects. In fact, descriptive norms do not affect female employers’ hiring decisions at all and lead to norm reactance and backlash from male employers when informed that others have hired more women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30636/jbpa.21.51

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Adler, A. ([1910] 1956). Inferiority feeling and masculine protest. In H. L. Ansbacher & R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.), The individual psychology of alfred adler: A systematic presentation in selections from his writings (pp. 45-52). New York: Basic Books.
  2. Davies, L. (2014). Women on boards. Davies Review Annual Report. UK: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.
  3. Davies, L. (2015). Women on boards: Five year summary (Davies Review). Davies Report. UK: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.
  4. Schmader, T. (2002). Group identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201.
  5. Schmitt, M. T., Lehmiller, J. J., & Walsh, A. L. (2007). The role of heterosexual identity threat in differential support for same-sex `civil unions' versus `marriages'. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 443-455.
  6. Selden, S. C. (1997). Representative bureaucracy: Examining the linkage between passive and active representation in the farmers home administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 22-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paryavi, M., Bohnet, I., & Van Geen, A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2576-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915340247
Cited by
10
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
descriptive norms, gender diversity, backlash, hiring decisions, gender stereotypes, rule compliance, gender bias in employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review