The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subverting Swann: First- and Second-Generation Segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Abstract
For more than 40 years, communities across the United States have grappled with Brown’s mandate to provide equality of educational opportunities to Black children by ending school segregation. Despite considerable unambiguous evidence that desegregation enhances students’ long-term outcomes such as educational and occupational attainment, the situation with respect to short-term outcomes is more ambiguous and more highly contested. Using survey data from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, a North Carolina district that used mandatory busing to desegregate its schools, the author demonstrates the direct and indirect negative effects of segregation on academic achievement in ways not employed previously. The distinctive research design includes a longitudinal measure of exposure to racially isolated Black elementary education, multiple indicators of educational outcomes, measures of track placement, and a large representative sample of grade 12 students from the entire school system. By demonstrating how both direct and indirect effects of segregated education impair Blacks’ academic outcomes, and how—even in an ostensibly desegregated school system—Whites retain privileged access to greater opportunities to learn, this article increases our understanding of the role of segregated schooling in maintaining the racial gap in academic achievement. Future research in other school districts once believed to be successfully desegregated will allow us to judge whether the situation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School district reflects a more general pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture
Erben, M., Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1979) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589547 · Cited by 8,143
Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture
Broadfoot, T. (1978) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/0305006780140109 · Cited by 6,685
EQUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY
Coleman, J. S. (1968) · Equity & Excellence in Education · doi:10.1080/0020486680060504 · Cited by 5,308
The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.
Preston, S. H., Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1995) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137757 · Cited by 3,998
Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality.
Oromaner, M., & Oakes, J. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070941 · Cited by 3,424
Introducing Multilevel Modeling
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781849209366 · Cited by 2,997
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2000) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2,801
Equality of Educational Opportunity.
Sewell, W. H., Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091094 · Cited by 2,753
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · Cited by 2,262
Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments
Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202113 · Cited by 1,772
Cited by
Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.xli.4.778 · Cited by 739
Tools of Exclusion: Race, Disability, and (Re)segregated Education
Ferri, B. A., & Connor, D. J. (2005) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00483.x · Cited by 396
Different Teachers, Different Peers: The Magnitude of Student Sorting Within Schools
Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x13495087 · Cited by 201
Decomposing School Resegregation: Social Closure, Racial Imbalance, and Racial Isolation
Fiel, J. E. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413496252 · Cited by 160
Effects of School Racial Composition on K–12 Mathematics Outcomes: A Metaregression Analysis
Mickelson, R. A., Bottia, M. C., & Lambert, R. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312475322 · Cited by 140
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mickelson, R. A.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-252
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2153109842
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 58.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subverting Swann: First- and Second-Generation Segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/00028312038002215
- The paper
- Mickelson, R. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and Second-Generation Segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.