The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning
Abstract
Curriculum materials for Grades K–12 that are intended to promote teacher learning in addition to student learning have come to be called educative curriculum materials . How can K–12 curriculum materials be designed to best promote teacher learning? What might teacher learning with educative curriculum materials look like? The authors present a set of design heuristics for educative curriculum materials to further the principled design of these materials. They build from ideas about teacher learning and organize the heuristics around important parts of a teacher’s knowledge base: subject matter knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge for topics, and pedagogical content knowledge for disciplinary practices. These heuristics provide a context for a theoretically oriented discussion of how features of educative curriculum materials may promote teacher learning, by serving as cognitive tools that are situated in teachers’ practice. The authors explore challenges in the design of educative curriculum materials, such as the tension between providing guidance and choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
BRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 · Cited by 5,047
Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain
Borko, H. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033008003 · Cited by 4,208
Mayer, R. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164603 · Cited by 2,304
The Place of Story in the Study of Teaching and Teacher Education
CARTER, K. (1993) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x022001005 · Cited by 935
Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications
BRANSFORD, J. D., & SCHWARTZ, D. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x024001061 · Cited by 881
Cited by
Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature
Glazer, N. (2011) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.605307 · Cited by 285
Elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20404 · Cited by 194
Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2021) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x20940683 · Cited by 163
Strengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis
Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373719849044 · Cited by 160
Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2046099063
- Cited by
- 1,140
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 130.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x034003003
- The paper
- Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x034003003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.