The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process
Abstract
The author shares her experiences with the editorial-review process while publishing a qualitative research study on the teaching experiences of African American faculty members at two predominantly White research universities. She likens the experiences of African American faculty members to counter narratives, troubles master narratives in the editorial-review process, draws implications, and makes recommendations for researchers invested in nonmainstream educational research in higher education. This is a call to journal editors and reviewers to examine their roles as disciplinary gatekeepers and to break the cycle of master narratives in educational research and the editorial-review process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge
Lyotard, J.-F., Bennington, G., & Massumi, B. (1984) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1772278 · Cited by 14,728
(1994) · Cited by 13,126
Handbook of qualitative research
Griffin, T. F. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199907)16:4<371::aid-mar7>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 9,037
Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Fine, G. A., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076550 · Cited by 7,766
Digest of Education Statistics
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5366 · Cited by 6,258
Critical race theory: an introduction
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2938 · Cited by 6,038
Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
Caldwell, V. F., & Crenshaw, K. W. (1996) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1123408 · Cited by 3,897
Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146819509700104 · Cited by 3,881
Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (2016) · Critical Race Theory in Education · doi:10.4324/9781315709796-2 · Cited by 3,167
Cited by
Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality: Working Through Dangers Seen, Unseen, and Unforeseen
Milner, H. R. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x07309471 · Cited by 1,714
Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us.
Turner, C. S. V., González, J. C., & Wood, J. L. (2008) · Journal of Diversity in Higher Education · doi:10.1037/a0012837 · Cited by 697
White Institutional Presence: The Impact of Whiteness on Campus Climate
Gusa, D. L. (2010) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.80.4.p5j483825u110002 · Cited by 358
O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217716767 · Cited by 292
Racism and Racial Equity in Higher Education
Museus, S. D., Ledesma, M. C., & Parker, T. L. (2015) · ASHE Higher Education Report · doi:10.1002/aehe.20067 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, C. A.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-24
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2017241901
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 54.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x06298008
- The paper
- Stanley, C. A. (2007). When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x06298008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
