The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences
Abstract
Despite increased attention to methodological rigor in education research, the field has focused heavily on experimental design and not on the merit of replicating important results. The present study analyzed the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year impact factor and found that only 0.13% of education articles were replications. Contrary to previous findings in medicine, but similar to psychology, the majority of education replications successfully replicated the original studies. However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. The results emphasize the importance of third-party, direct replications in helping education research improve its ability to shape education policy and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Novel or innovative results are more likely to be published than replications or incremental extensions of existing findings 13-15 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedLancet, T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60175-4 · Cited by 500
Retracted(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Agresti, A. (2006) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/0470114754 · Cited by 6,775
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Moffitt, R. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.660 · Cited by 4,888
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 5×
“Using health care research as an example, Ioannidis (2005a), in a review of highly cited medical publications (i.e., those cited more than 1,000 times), found only 44% of replications produced results similar to the original study.”
ResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1037//0003–066x.49.12.997 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins H. M., 1985, Changing order
- Kane E. J., 1984, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 23, 3
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 1
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21
- Perspectives on Psychological Science. (2012). Special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Retrieved from http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6.toc · DOI · Paper page
- Powell K., 2007, PLoS Biology, 12, 2748
- Rhine J. B., 1997, Extra-sensory perception
- Ritchie S. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 346
- 10.1037//0033–2909.86.3.638 · DOI · Paper page
- Rotton J., 1995, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 1
- Simons D. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 349
- Simons D. J., 2014, Perspectives on Psychological Science. APS Observer, 27, 16
- Williams S. N., 2012, Science, 336, 801
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 608
MORF: A Framework for Predictive Modeling and Replication At Scale With Privacy-Restricted MOOC Data
Gardner, J., Brooks, C. A., Andres, J. M. L., & Baker, R. S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621874 · Cited by 22
“A survey of the top 100 education journals [12] demonstrated that only 0.”
BackgroundVachon, B., Curran, J., Karunananthan, S., Brehaut, J., Graham, I. D., Moher, D., Sales, A. E., Straus, S. E., Fiander, M., Paprica, P. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.027 · Cited by 27
Zawacki‐Richter, O., Cefa, B., & Bai, J. Y. H. (2025) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70031 · Cited by 30
Schirmer, B. R., Schaffer, L., Therrien, W. J., & Schirmer, T. N. (2015) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1105338 · Cited by 21
“Given the risks of relying on results that have not been replicated, we have systematically varied aspects of the sample and procedure in line with constructive replications that are intended to test the targeted construct (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundRosman, T., Mayer, A., Merk, S., & Kerwer, M. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.007 · Cited by 21
de Ridder, J. (2022) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.003 · Cited by 24
Advanced Reading Comprehension Expectations in Secondary School
Ciullo, S. P., Ortiz, M. B., Otaiba, S. A., & Lane, K. L. (2015) · Journal of Disability Policy Studies · doi:10.1177/1044207315604365 · Cited by 21
“Although several strategies show promise and will be highlighted in the following sections, further replication studies are needed to establish that these strategies meet criteria for evidence-based practices (Cook & Odom, 2013; Horner & Kratochwill, 2012; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Replicable Services for Reproducible Research: A Model for Academic Libraries
Sayre, F., & Riegelman, A. (2019) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.80.2.260 · Cited by 25
“В последние годы в ряде дисциплин, включая психологию [1], биологию [2], биомедицину [3], неврологию [4], разработку лекарств [5], химию [6], климатологию [7], экономику [8, 9] и образование [10], появились свидетельства того, что наука стоит перед лицом кризиса воспроизводимости.”
East, M. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s026144481900048x · Cited by 21
“Makel and Plucker (2014) noted that just over 48% of the replications they identified were carried out by the same researchers who published the original research.”
BackgroundHyndman, B., & Harvey, S. (2020) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2019-0278 · Cited by 21
Teacher Beliefs and Responses Toward Student Misbehavior: Influence of Cognitive Skill Deficits
Hart, S. C., & DiPerna, J. C. (2016) · Journal of Applied School Psychology · doi:10.1080/15377903.2016.1229705 · Cited by 21
“Although the current results require replication (e.g., Makel & Plucker, 2014), school psychologists and other support professionals may consider sharing CSD information with teachers who are working with students displaying challenging behavior.”
BackgroundKorinth, S. P., & Nagler, T. (2021) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12408 · Cited by 23
“In light of the current replication crisis (Ioannidis, 2005), however, it would strengthen the status of the RAP approach, if independent groups would replicate its major findings (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Brown, C. P., Weber, N. B., & Yoon, Y. (2015) · Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10901027.2014.996925 · Cited by 20
“…further amplify the potential impact of such reform initiatives as Common Core or Race to the Top that seek to standardize and/or align ECE with elementary school programs and limit the space for teachers to examine issues central to children’s lives in and out of school (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Boccasini, A., Perilli, V., & Spagnuolo, C. (2016) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2016.1187462 · Cited by 20
“In light of this situation, new research studies with additional participants seem warranted (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundA technology-aided program for helping persons with Alzheimer’s disease perform daily activities
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Pinto, K., Vanna, F. D., & Caffò, A. O. (2017) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-03-2017-0011 · Cited by 20
A Path to Greater Credibility: Large-Scale Collaborative Education Research
Makel, M. C., Smith, K. N., McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Miller, E. M. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419891963 · Cited by 27
Self-citationTraverso, L., Tonizzi, I., Usai, M. C., & Viterbori, P. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105014 · Cited by 20
Boutet, I., Nelson, E. A., Watier, N. N., Cousineau, D., Béland, S., & Collin, C. A. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-021-02337-7 · Cited by 21
Powers, J. M., Fischman, G. E., & Berliner, D. C. (2016) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x16663703 · Cited by 23
“This is striking because there are few replication studies in education research (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Schneider, 2004).”
BackgroundKager, K., Kalinowski, E., Jurczok, A., & Vock, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1322624 · Cited by 21
Similarities and differences in program registers: A case study
Zack, M. K., Karre, J. K., Olson, J. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2019) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101676 · Cited by 19
Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey
Amin, M. E., Borders, J. C., Long, H. L., Keller, M. A., & Kearney, E. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00062 · Cited by 26
Hammerschmidt‐Snidarich, S. M., Maki, K. E., & Adams, S. R. (2019) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22241 · Cited by 18
O’Connor, S. M., Power, J., & Blom, N. (2023) · Australasian journal of engineering education · doi:10.1080/22054952.2023.2220265 · Cited by 18
“‘If education research is to be relied upon to develop sound policy and practice, then conducting replications on important findings is essential to moving towards a more reliable and trust-worthy understanding of educational environments’ (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundAIED: From Cognitive Simulations to Learning Engineering, with Humans in the Middle
McNamara, D. S. (2023) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00349-y · Cited by 18
“…and interventions have either not been tested at scale, or have failed to replicate beyond their initial, constrained contexts and populations (e.g., laboratory experiments and targeted classroom studies; Kizilcec et al., 2020 ; Lortie-Forgues and Inglis, 2019 ; Makel and Plucker, 2014 ).”
Registered reports and replications: An ongoing Journal of School Psychology initiative
Braden, J. P. (2024) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101294 · Cited by 18
Replicating rockets and feathers
Cook, S., & Fosten, J. (2018) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.021 · Cited by 18
Vachon, B., Curran, J., Karunananthan, S., Brehaut, J., Graham, I. D., Moher, D., Sales, A. E., Straus, S. E., Fiander, M., Paprica, P. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.006 · Cited by 19
Replicating 21 findings on student success in online learning
Andres, J. M. L., Baker, R. S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Spann, C. A. (2017) · Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · Cited by 18
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., & Campodonico, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00205 · Cited by 19
Research Commentary: On Replications
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2018) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0091 · Cited by 18
A Replication of the Internal Validity Structure of Three Major Teaching Rating Scales
Peters, S. J., & Pereira, N. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x17701940 · Cited by 20
“To quote a seminal paper by Makel and Plucker (2014), “facts are more important than novelty” (p. 304), and facts require replication.”
BackgroundThe impact of English-medium instruction on university student performance
Barrigüete, J. L. A., Sánchez, J. I. L., Contreras, M. F. M., & Soffritti, M. (2022) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2022.2047193 · Cited by 17
“As Makel and Plucker (2014) point out, there is a shortage of replication in the Education Sciences, and this work aims precisely to fi ll this gap, extending the work of Dafouz, Camacho-Mill-ano, and Urquia (2014), and Dafouz and Camacho-Miñano (2016).”
Runco, M. A., & Alabbasi, A. M. A. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101583 · Cited by 17
Alvarado, A. R., & Olson, A. B. (2020) · NACADA Journal · doi:10.12930/nacada-19-33 · Cited by 17
“Replication of empirical studies is considered one of the ‘‘ basic building blocks of science ’’ (Makel & Plucker, 2014, p. 305), but studies cannot be replicated unless sufficient details are provided about the study’s design, sample, and methods.”
BackgroundHoldaway, A. S., Hustus, C. L., Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., Coles, E. K., Egan, T. E., Himawan, L. K., Zoromski, A. K., Dawson, A. E., & Mixon, C. S. (2020) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-020-09375-w · Cited by 17
Is There a Replication Crisis in Medical Education Research?
Hope, D., Dewar, A., & Hay, C. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004063 · Cited by 16
Assessing the replication landscape in experimental linguistics
Kobrock, K., & Roettger, T. B. (2023) · Glossa Psycholinguistics · doi:10.5070/g6011135 · Cited by 18
Parent-implemented interventions in Chinese families of children with autism spectrum disorder
Gao, X., & Drani, S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02710-5 · Cited by 16
Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. W. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09674-3 · Cited by 18
Cimpian, J. R., & Timmer, J. D. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419888892 · Cited by 18
“Education researchers, and indeed the broader field of social scientists, are under increasing pressure to replicate and preregister studies to ensure the robustness of published findings (Fanelli & Ioannidis, 2013; Gehlbach & Robinson, 2018; Makel & Plucker, 2014; Open Science Collaboration, 2015).”
BackgroundCollege Students’ Development of Badminton Skills and Tactical Competencies Following Play Practice
Liu, H., Wang, W., Zhang, C., & Hastie, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2019-0292 · Cited by 18
Open science reforms: Strengths, challenges, and future directions
Wentzel, K. R. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1901709 · Cited by 18
“Studies that have documented low replication rates have included only a very small number of educational psychology journals (e.g., Makel et al., 2012; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundMoss, B. G., & Yeaton, W. H. (2015) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x15610192 · Cited by 16
Hosp, J. L., Ford, J. W., Huddle, S. M., & Hensley, K. (2017) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/1534508417727489 · Cited by 16
“It is designed to examine the accuracy of specific results and data from the original study (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F., Tedone, R., Quaranta, S., & Caffò, A. O. (2018) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-018-9636-7 · Cited by 16
Kenyon, K. L., Cosentino, B. J., Gottesman, A. J., Onorato, M. E., Hoque, J., & Hoskins, S. G. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy145 · Cited by 15
Simpson, A. P., & Vondrová, N. (2019) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2019.1674563 · Cited by 16
“Replication studies are rare in most fields: Makel and Plucker (2014) suggest only around 1 in 750 education articles is a replication. In studies of the development of professional vision, there appears to be only one: Star, Lynch, and Perova's (2011)”
BackgroundInfluentialBalancing Rigor, Replication, and Relevance: A Case for Multiple-Cohort, Longitudinal Experiments
Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419876252 · Cited by 16
“A recent review of the top 100 education journals as measured by impact factor found that 0.13% of all published studies over a 5-year period were replications (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialMcGill, M. M. (2019) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3364510.3364528 · Cited by 17
Effectiveness Research for Teacher Education
Hill, H. C., Mancenido, Z., & Loeb, S. (2024) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x241260393 · Cited by 15
“Doing so would essentially test the durability of findings and potentially build understanding of where content and pedagogy are most and least effective (for an example, see Cohen et al., 2024; for discussions of replication, see Makel and Plucker, 2014; Star, 2021).”
Kennedy, J. L., Christensen, C., Maxon, T., Gerard, S. N., Garcia, E. B., Kook, J. F., Hupert, N., Vahey, P., & Pasnik, S. (2022) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312221113326 · Cited by 15
“Although replication is an essential part of the scientific process to confirm the efficacy of an intervention, it is uncommon in education research for study findings to be replicated with a second group of participants (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F., Perilli, V., Chiariello, V., & Zimbaro, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00338 · Cited by 15
“Obviously, new studies with additional participants are warranted to verify the suitability of the program and the reliability of the findings (19, 47).”
BackgroundAuthoritative school climate, number of parents at home, and academic achievement.
Huang, F. L., Eklund, K. R., & Cornell, D. G. (2016) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000182 · Cited by 18
“Recent articles in education sciences and psychology have highlighted the need to replicate studies in order for research to be able to influence educational policy and practice (Makel & Plucker, 2014) and “replications in psychology reflect a growing trend in science” (Bohannon, 2014, p. 789).”
BackgroundInvestigating a Tier 1 Intervention Focused on Proportional Reasoning: A Follow-Up Study
Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Karl, S. R., Simonson, G. R., & Slater, S. C. (2017) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402917691017 · Cited by 15
“Several authors have pointed out that replications are a staple in methods textbooks and are badly needed (Makel & Plucker, 2014) but rarely appear in practice (Duncan, Engel, Claessens, & Dowsett, 2015).”
MethodLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Buonocunto, F., Lanzilotti, C., Alberti, G., & Navarro, J. (2020) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2020.1763462 · Cited by 15
“Further studies with additional participants may help clarify the effectiveness and robustness of the new technology solution and determine the reliability of the present data (34,35).”
BackgroundBlocking Vs. Interleaving: Examining Single-Session Effects Within Middle School Math Homework
Ostrow, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., & Peterson, Z. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_34 · Cited by 23
“13% of publications were replications [8].”
Conceptual replications, research, and the “what works” agenda in education
Morrison, K. (2022) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2021.2022314 · Cited by 15
“For example: Chhin et al. (2018), Coyne et al. (2013, 2016), Gersten et al. (2015), Q. Hao et al. (2019), Hawe et al. (2015), Hendrick (1991), Makel and Plucker (2014), Melhuish (2018), Morrison (2019), National Science Foundation and Institute of Education Sciences (2018), Rosenthal (1991),…”
BackgroundNoncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance
Martín‐Raugh, M. P., Kell, H. J., Ling, G., Fishtein, D., & Yang, Z. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2073964 · Cited by 19
“We underscore the importance of the first component of this study, as the need to replicate prior research in education (Makel and Plucker 2014) and psychology (Maxwell, Lau, and Howard 2015) has become increasingly important over the last decade.”
MethodSurfacing Inequities and Their Broader Implications in the CS Education Research Community
McGill, M. M., Davis, S., & Reyes, J. (2022) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/3501385.3543969 · Cited by 14
A Targeted Review of Open Practices in Special Education Publications
Cook, B. G., van Dijk, W., Vargas, I., Aigotti, S. M., Fleming, J. I., McDonald, S. D., Richmond, C. L., Griendling, L. M., McLucas, A. S., & Johnson, R. M. (2023) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029221145195 · Cited by 18
“…studies represent approximately 0.5% of the published special education literature (Lemons et al., 2016; Makel et al., 2016), which—though a small proportion of the literature base—is larger than the proportion of replications found in education journals generally (0.1%; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
ResultInfluentialLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Renna, C., & Pinto, K. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00087 · Cited by 15
“…research efforts seem to be warranted to determine the strength of the data available and conceivably, investigate upgrades of the programs so as to make them more functional and/or respectful of the participants (Barlow et al., 2009; Kazdin, 2011; Godwin et al., 2013; Makel and Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Turnone, B., Laporta, D., Scordamaglia, A., & Pinto, K. (2019) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317519844144 · Cited by 15
Training teachers' diagnostic competence with problem-based learning: A pilot and replication study
Wedel, A., Müller, C. R., Pfetsch, J. S., & Ittel, A. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102909 · Cited by 17
Australian and Italian Psychologists’ View of Replication
Agnoli, F., Fraser, H. S., Thorn, F. S., & Fidler, F. M. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459211039218 · Cited by 13
“Similar studies in other fields have also shown very low prevalence of published replication studies, including rates of only 0.13% in education research (Makel & Plucker, 2014) and 1.2% in marketing research (Evanschitzky et al., 2007).”
ResultInfluentialWinder, C. M., & Corter, C. M. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.005 · Cited by 17
Measuring teacher authenticity: Criteria students use in their perception of teacher authenticity
Bruyckere, P. D., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2017.1354573 · Cited by 22
“There is at present a major discussion in both psychology and educational sciences about replication (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundLanguage and Literacy: Issues and Considerations
Hartman, M. C., Nicolarakis, O. D., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030180 · Cited by 14
“In regards to replication research, a recent study published in Educational Researcher (ER), a peer-reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), reported that although replicating is essential for helping education research improve its usefulness to policymakers and practitioners, less tha…”
BackgroundShapiro, A. (2022) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029221108735 · Cited by 13
“This finding adds to the literature, given the relative lack of replication evidence in education research (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Travers et al., 2016).”
ResultMcCulley, L. V., & Osman, D. J. (2015) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.002 · Cited by 13
“As researchers attempt to understand “What works” for students in social studies education, they might consider the importance of rigorous replication studies (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundHughes, R., Kimball, E. W., & Koricich, A. (2019) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03457-3_10 · Cited by 15
Phelps-Gregory, C. M., Frank, M. L., & Spitzer, S. M. (2019) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2019.1618423 · Cited by 13
“Given the passage of time and limitations of the previous research, we conducted a conceptual follow-up replication for the current study instead of a direct replication (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
MethodImproving the reproducibility of findings by updating research methodology
Klein, J. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01196-6 · Cited by 19
See, B. H., Morris, R., Gorard, S. A. C., Siddiqui, N., Easterbrook, M. J., Nieuwenhuis, M., Fox, K. J., Harris, P. R., & Banerjee, R. A. (2022) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2021.2022317 · Cited by 13
“Makel and Plucker (2014) noted that only 13% of around 16,000 studies in the top-100 education journals were replications.”
BackgroundGeneralizability, transferability, and the practice-to-practice gap
de Leeuw, J. R., Motz, B. A., Fyfe, E. R., Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x21000406 · Cited by 23
Bell, C. A., & Gitomer, D. (2023) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101278 · Cited by 13
Rating Teachers Cheaper, Faster, and Better
Good, T. L., & Lavigne, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487115574292 · Cited by 13
“Although we agree with Makel and Plucker (2014) that replication is an important activity and that often too much reliance is placed upon a single or few studies, GS’ work would have more impact if they reported that their research was part of the continuing history of research on teaching and not…”
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Zimbaro, C., Chiariello, V., & Campodonico, F. (2018) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-170182 · Cited by 13
Jacobson, E. D., & Simpson, A. M. (2018) · Mathematics Education Research Journal · doi:10.1007/s13394-018-0242-x · Cited by 14
“However, replication studies of education studies are rare; only about 1 in 1000 studies published in major education journals is a replication study (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Buonocunto, F., Navarro, J., Lanzilotti, C., Fiore, P., Megna, M., et al. (2015) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-151269 · Cited by 13
Effectiveness of Flipped Classrooms for K–12 Students: Evidence From a Three-Level Meta-Analysis
Li, S., Fu, W., Liu, X., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241261732 · Cited by 34
“This will not only benefit knowledge accumulation and lead to more thorough evaluations but also support the replication and generalization of FCs across diverse populations (Hedges, 2017; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Tincani, M., Travers, J. C., Dowdy, A., Slocum, T. A., & Deitrich, R. (2025) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-025-00441-9 · Cited by 17
“…findings less reliable or robust than initially conceived, or they have noted a general lack of published replication studies (e.g., Evanschitzky & Armstrong, 2010; Hubbard & Armstrong, 1994; Ioannidis, 2005, 2012; Open Science Collaboration, 2015; Makel & Plucker, 2014; Pashler & Harris, 2012).”
Reproducibility: A Primer on Semantics and Implications for Research
Pellizzari, E. D., Lohr, K. N., Blatecky, A. R., & Creel, D. V. (2017) · doi:10.3768/rtipress.2017.bk.0020.1708 · Cited by 12
Shaw, S. R., D'Intino, J., & Lysenko, E. (2019) · Canadian Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1177/0829573519843027 · Cited by 12
Nicht replizieren: publizieren!?
Rost, D. H., & Bienefeld, M. A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000253 · Cited by 13
A Formative Experiment to Align Middle-School History Instruction with Literacy Goals
Colwell, J., & Reinking, D. (2016) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811611801201 · Cited by 12
“Replication, which has been documented to be minimal in published education research (Makel & Plucker, 2014), is essential to this methodological approach, because replication enables the development of more generalizable pedagogical theory (Reinking & Bradley, 2008).”
BackgroundClausen, J., Borthwick, A. C., & Rutledge, D. W. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10018-3 · Cited by 15
Positivity bias in higher education research
Tight, M. (2022) · Higher Education Quarterly · doi:10.1111/hequ.12388 · Cited by 11
Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey
Nguyen, P., McKenzie, J. E., Hamilton, D. G., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Fidler, F. M., Haddaway, N., Higgins, J. P. T., Kanukula, R., Karunananthan, S., et al. (2023) · Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods · doi:10.1002/cesm.12009 · Cited by 12
“Moreover, many participants were convinced that not enough replication was being conducted, echoing similar conclusions from opinion surveys of researchers using other study designs [24, 25], as well as the actual occurrence of replication studies in the literature [10 – 12].”
Böhmer, I., Hörstermann, T., Gräsel, C., Krolak‐Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:11490 · Cited by 12
Rigor, Replication, and Reproducibility: Increasing the Relevance of Behavioral Disorders Research
Gage, N. A., & Stevens, R. N. (2018) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1353/etc.2018.0029 · Cited by 12
“For example, Makel and Plucker (2014) reviewed the top 100 education journals to identify how many published studies were true replications.”
BackgroundA revalidation of the school participant empowerment scale amongst science and mathematics teachers
Rangel, V. S., Suskavcevic, M., Kapral, A., & Dominey, W. (2018) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2018.1541131 · Cited by 12
“Additionally, there is a need for replication work within education research to ensure that the instruments we use and the work we produce are meaningful across contexts (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundDecker, A., & McGill, M. M. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9020069 · Cited by 12
Ferguson, S. L., Kerrigan, M. R., & Hovey, K. A. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1436 · Cited by 13
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F., Acquaviva, G., Chiariello, V., & Desideri, L. (2020) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2020.1827213 · Cited by 12
“Yet, this information may have relevant practical implications (i.e. may help determine the overall usability of the program and ways to implement it within daily contexts) and thus would need to be gathered (Kazdin 2011, Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundReviews in Research on Adolescence: Genres, Trends, and Challenges
Levesque, R. J. R. (2015) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-015-0022-8 · Cited by 12
“…a finding supported by reviews of disciplines that identify very few published replications (e.g., the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year impact factor found that only 0.13 % of education articles were replications; see Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Chiariello, V., Grillo, G., & Turi, C. (2018) · International Journal of Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1080/20473869.2018.1533062 · Cited by 12
“Such limitation imposes a certain level of caution in making general statements about the results reported and asks for direct and systematic replication efforts to determine the dependability of the program and its usability across situations and participants (Kazdin 2011, Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundGraded sensitivity to structure and meaning throughout the human language networkPreprint
Shain, C., Kean, H., Casto, C., Lipkin, B., Affourtit, J., Siegelman, M., Mollica, F., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.12.467812 · Cited by 12
Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., Milanés‐Guisado, Y., Alba-Ruiz, R., & Delgado-Vázquez, Á. M. (2023) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2023-0021 · Cited by 15
Exploring the scientific impact of negative results
Tian, D., Hu, X., Qian, Y., & Li, J. (2024) · J. Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101481 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 304-316
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2139319950
- Semantic Scholar
- 493a2e93117a876871ac446b26acf47c50ea2cef
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 68.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- replication, direct replication, educational research, publishing history, research credibility, methodological quality, replication success, educational periodicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review