The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences
Abstract
Despite increased attention to methodological rigor in education research, the field has focused heavily on experimental design and not on the merit of replicating important results. The present study analyzed the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year impact factor and found that only 0.13% of education articles were replications. Contrary to previous findings in medicine, but similar to psychology, the majority of education replications successfully replicated the original studies. However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. The results emphasize the importance of third-party, direct replications in helping education research improve its ability to shape education policy and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Novel or innovative results are more likely to be published than replications or incremental extensions of existing findings 13-15 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedLancet, T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60175-4 · Cited by 500
Retracted(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Agresti, A. (2006) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/0470114754 · Cited by 6,775
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Moffitt, R. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.660 · Cited by 4,888
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 5×
“Using health care research as an example, Ioannidis (2005a), in a review of highly cited medical publications (i.e., those cited more than 1,000 times), found only 44% of replications produced results similar to the original study.”
ResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1037//0003–066x.49.12.997 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins H. M., 1985, Changing order
- Kane E. J., 1984, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 23, 3
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 1
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21
- Perspectives on Psychological Science. (2012). Special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Retrieved from http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6.toc · DOI · Paper page
- Powell K., 2007, PLoS Biology, 12, 2748
- Rhine J. B., 1997, Extra-sensory perception
- Ritchie S. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 346
- 10.1037//0033–2909.86.3.638 · DOI · Paper page
- Rotton J., 1995, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 1
- Simons D. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 349
- Simons D. J., 2014, Perspectives on Psychological Science. APS Observer, 27, 16
- Williams S. N., 2012, Science, 336, 801
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 608
Replication of Quantitative Psychological and Educational Research: A Philosophical Analysis
Cantley, I. (2023) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/2001119 · Cited by 1
Beyond the Original: Exploring Replication Research in Higher Education
Soppe, K. F. B., & Huisman, J. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2056-375220240000010007 · Cited by 1
Drageset, D., & Crippen, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09431-x · Cited by 1
“Replication is a core component of any empirical science, yet replication studies are under-published in education (Makel & Plucker, 2014) and more generally across fields of science (Ioannidis, 2012).”
Do replications receive fewer citations? A counterfactual approach
Coupé, T., Logchies, T., & Reed, W. R. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05288-0 · Cited by 1
“Only about 0.13% of studies in education are replicated (Makel & Plucker, 2014), 0.45% in criminology (Pridemore et al., 2018), 0.25% in second language research (Marsden et al., 2018), 1.07% in psychology (Makel et al., 2012), 0.41% in special education research (Lemons et al., 2016), and 0.1% in…”
InfluentialIntroducing the Journal Editors Discussion Interface
Bottesini, J. G., Silverstein, P., Karcher, S., & Elman, C. (2025) · IASSIST Quarterly · doi:10.29173/iq1146 · Cited by 1
“…al. 2013; Nosek et al., 2015; Levenstein & Lyle, 2018; Nosek et al. 2022), economics (Christensen and Miguel 2018; Miguel et al., 2014), education (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Cook et al., 2018; Gehlbach & Robinson, 2018; McBee et al., 2018; Fleming et al., 2021), political science (Lupia & Elman,…”
Yost, B. L. (2020) · Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) · doi:10.34917/8220176 · Cited by 1
Omasta, M., & Brandley, A. T. (2016) · Youth Theatre Journal · doi:10.1080/08929092.2016.1160015 · Cited by 1
“In addition to these questions, we set out to create a research instrument that would enable easy replication of this study, given that “the need to increase [replication studies] is apparent and permeates all levels of education research” (Makel and Pucker 2014, 311).”
BackgroundMethodChristensen, R. W., & Knezek, G. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2016.49 · Cited by 1
“Makel and Plucker [13] define replication as “the purposeful repetition of previous results to corroborate or disconfirm the previous results”.”
ResultBavarian, N., Sumstine, S., Cruz, S., Mendez, J., Schroeder, C., & Takeda, S. (2017) · Journal of Drug Issues · doi:10.1177/0022042617740910 · Cited by 1
“Thus, it is important for future research teams with non-overlapping authors to attempt to replicate our findings (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundCobern, W. W., Adams, B. A., Pleasants, B. A.-S., Bentley, A. P. K., & Kagumba, R. (2019) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University) · Cited by 1
Mack, S. (2019) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1
Pfost, M., & Borgstede, M. (2020) · Edition ZfE · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26438-3_2 · Cited by 1
A Brief History of Meta-analysis
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.002 · Cited by 2
Auwera, S. V. D., Mathys, L., Smedt, B. D., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2021) · Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1163/26670127-01010005 · Cited by 2
The Reproducibility Crisis in Science Education Studies: Causes and Solutions
Nakamura, D., HARADA, Y., HISASAKA, T., UNZAI, H., & Matsuura, T. (2021) · Journal of Research in Science Education · doi:10.11639/sjst.sp20016 · Cited by 1
“という質問に対しては,52% が「大いに危機的な状況にある」,38%が「やや危機 的な状況にある」と回答した(Baker, 2016)。このよ うな再現性の危機 1)は,自然科学のみならず人文社 会科学においても問題視されている。例えば,Open Science Collaboration(2015)の大規模な追試研究 では,過去の心理学分野の研究のうち,結果が統 計的に再現されたのは全体の 36%であった。また, Makel and Plucker(2014)は教育分野でインパクト ファクターが高いトップ 100 誌の追試研究を分析し た結果,再現に成功した追試は 70%であるが,その…”
InfluentialIssues of Teacher Performance Stability are Not New: Limitations and Possibilities
Good, T. L., & Lavigne, A. L. (2015) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v22.1916 · Cited by 1
Improving pedagogy through Registered Reports
McAleer, P., & Paterson, H. (2021) · Open Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.56230/osotl.13 · Cited by 1
Evidence on evidence-informed policy and practice
Gough, D., Sharples, J., & Maidment, C. (2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/5ee7de7c-en · Cited by 2
Das Provokative Essay: Open Science als Weg zu verlässlicher sonderpädagogischer Forschung
Lüke, T. (2022) · Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete · doi:10.2378/vhn2022.art33d · Cited by 1
Lunn, S. J., Samary, M. M., & Peterfreund, A. R. (2023) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3587102.3588813 · Cited by 1
Improving Research in Educational Psychology, Psychology, and the Social SciencesPreprint
Smith, K. N., Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ams9e · Cited by 1
Self-citationHuff, M., & Bongartz, E. C. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9yhcz · Cited by 1
Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersPreprint
Cook, B. G., Lloyd, J. W., & Therrien, W. J. (2019) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/duvf8 · Cited by 1
“Given the frequency of questionable research practices and publication bias (e.g., John et al., 2012), as well as the general scarcity of replication studies (Makel & Plucker, 2014), the low rate of reproducing positive findings (e.g., Open Science Collaborative, 2015) is not surprising.”
BackgroundProposal to NSF 19-565 to Create a STEM Education Research HubPreprint
Nosek, B. A., Ofiesh, L., Grasty, F. L., Pfeiffer, N., Mellor, D. T., Brooks, R. E., Benjamin, M., Booth, A., Bowman, S. D., Davis, J. C., et al. (2019) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/4mpuc · Cited by 2
Self-citationReproducible research practices and transparency across linguisticsPreprint
Bochyńska, A., Keeble, L., Halfacre, C. A. E., Casillas, J. V., Champagne, I.-A., Chen, K., Röthlisberger, M., Buchanan, E. M., & Roettger, T. B. (2023) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/rcews · Cited by 2
Navigating Collective Activity Systems: An Approach Towards Rhetorical Inquiry
Royce, K. J. (2015) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Privileging language as social semiotic in higher education
Bishop, J. (2015) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2015.01.004
Incomplete Reporting: Addressing the Prevalence of Outcome-Reporting Bias in Educational Research.
Trainor, B. C., Polanin, J. R., Williams, R. T., & Pigott, T. (2015) · Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness
Denholm, J. E. (2015) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0166157
Johl, L. E. (2016) · KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)
Panel Session—Scaling Up Learning Analytics Research Innovations: Challenges and Approaches
Whitmer, J., Kennedy, G. E., Ben-Naim, D., & Pardo, A. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2018.8615197
Teacher Self-Efficacy for STEM Talent Development
Margot, K. C. (2017) · doi:10.12794/metadc1011775
“Replication is necessary to establish any type of generalizability (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Towards an Idiographic EducationPreprint
Savi, A. O. (2019) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/7gqhz
Turner, L. M. (2019) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.4967
“There have been a limited number of replication studies in the social sciences and education (Lemon et al., 2016; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundReplicable services for reproducible research: a model for academic libraries
Sayre, F., & Riegelman, A. (2020) · Bibliosphere · doi:10.20913/1815-3186-2019-4-33-45
Conclusions and Final Reflections
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.008
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.003
Lindquist, T. M., & Rausch, A. (2021) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-021-00318-3 · Cited by 2
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.001
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.005
ALİKILIÇ, İ., & ALİKILIÇ, Ö. (2020) · Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.17829/turcom.598078 · Cited by 1
Replication crisisPreprint
Quang-Loc, N. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4wd5x
Collaborating to Bring the Credibility Revolution to Giftedness and Talent Development ResearchPreprint
Makel, M. C., Smith, K. N., Miller, E. M., Peters, S. J., & McBee, M. T. (2019) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/ac3h6 · Cited by 1
Self-citationKeefer, J. K. (2001) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004490710_004
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-799962-3.00008-2
Some of Frontiers Education Articles: Around First to Eleven December 2020Preprint
Sarbunan, T. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3756716
Of intersectionality, replicability, and holistic perspectives
Mack, S. (2019) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.21.12mac
Perspectives on education research
Bangs, J., Henry, M., Nagy, E. K., Prøitz, T. S., Schneider, M., Tseng, V., Damme, D. V., & Yurita, M. (2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/e83abf22-en · Cited by 1
Facilitating research use: Scary Barriers (and Super Mechanisms)
Torres, J. M. (2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/cd4e8487-en · Cited by 1
Individuals’ extrinsic and intrinsic incentives to produce education research
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/a195b515-en
Levels of individuals’ activity reported by systems in research production.
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/dc8ed027-en
Presence of mechanisms facilitating the use of educational research, 2021
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/901c32b1-en
Size and strength of ministries’ networks
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/267b1dd7-en
OECD (2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/e5bf3102-en
Overview of policy makers’ learning opportunities
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/911001f0-en
Relevance of ministry connections to organisations active in facilitating research use in policy
(2022) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/04374594-en
Correspondence Measures for Assessing Replication SuccessPreprint
Steiner, P. M., Sheehan, P., & Wong, V. C. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6vy75
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.011
Unpicking the Evidence about Parental Involvement and Engagement
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.007
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.010
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.006
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.012
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.013
Details of the Meta-analyses Included
Higgins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618.009
Opening knowledge through education and science
OECD (2022) · OECD education spotlights · doi:10.1787/024062b6-en
Mason, E. N., & Lembke, E. S. (2022) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/15345084221133730
“In replications that have author overlap, it is more likely for findings from the original study to be replicated (i.e., confirmed; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundBuchanan, E. M. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/9hzfe
Lachney, M., & Kuyenga, M. C. A. (2023) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/07341512.2023.2251212
Hernández, J. H., Xolocotzin, U., & Aguilar, M. S. (2023) · Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1163/26670127-bja10016 · Cited by 1
MacKay, J. R. D., & Wu, S. C. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119852865.ch17 · Cited by 3
A Pathway to Initiate Engineering Education Research: A First-Year Reflection on Faculty Development
Giancaspro, J. W., Arboleda, D., Heller, A. S., & Ghahremaninezhad, A. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--42456
Investigación educativa: agenda abierta por la construcción de un impacto real en educación
Balbi, A. (2024) · Páginas de Educación · doi:10.22235/pe.v17i1.3924
Comparison of mental disorders between stroke patients and healthy people in Karaj
Imeni, M., Kamkari, K., Taherkhani, K., & Kiomarsi, F. (2024) · Romanian Journal of Medical Practice · doi:10.37897/rjmp.2024.1.6
Skau, S., Börjesson, M., Nyman, R., & Thompson, W. H. (2024) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/g3xcd
Study of Scenario, and Economic Technical Feasibility of Thermal Power Using Statistical ModelingPreprint
Piropo, E. D. S., Ferreira, A. M. S., & Filho, A. P. G. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4870207
Likvärdighet i idrott och hälsa?
Jansson, A. (2024) · doi:10.24834/isbn.9789178774340
Buchanan, E. M. (2024) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911241280763
“Furthermore, the current focus on replication (Makel et al., 2012; Makel & Plucker, 2014; Zwaan et al., 2018), reproducibility (Nelson et al., 2018), and the credibility of our results (Vazire et al., 2022) has demonstrated questionable measurement practices—decisions that researchers make like…”
Conditions Under Which College Students Can be Responsive to Text-based NudgingPreprint
Page, L. C., Meyer, K. E., Lee, J. J., & Gehlbach, H. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5069370
Replication using confirmatory latent class analysis: A school climate example
Romero, L. S., O’Malley, M. D., & Carter, D. B. (2025) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101455 · Cited by 2
Marefat, F., Farahanynia, M., Hamidi, F., Najjarpour, M., Banitalebi, Z., & Alamdar, P. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.37213/cjal.2024.33477
Borman, G. D., Borman, T., Park, S. J., & Zhu, B. (2025) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584251364785 · Cited by 1
A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Achievement Impacts of a Replicable Summer Reading Program
Borman, G. D., & Yang, H. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111422 · Cited by 1
Bridging Theory and Simulation: Using ChatGPT for Computational Thinking Scale Replication Study
Cai, Y., Goh, T., Zou, W., Liu, M., & Yang, B. X. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2578402
“Makel and Plucker (2014) analyzed articles in the top 100 education journals and found that only 0.13% were replications study.”
InfluentialYarmush, M. L. (2025) · Innovation and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1142/s2737599425300107
The Persistent Honors Student: Intent to Return to College After the First Year
Miller, A. L., & Cognard-Black, A. J. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x251400553
“Honors programs are well positioned to make positive contributions to several important outcomes, including retention and subsequent degree completion, and it is important to demonstrate and replicate these relationships empirically (Cosgrove, 2004; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Overall Peer Justice Predicts Inclusion in Student Teams in Biomedical Engineering
Martin, C. C., & Newstetter, W. (2025) · Biomedical Engineering Education · doi:10.1007/s43683-025-00202-9
“Replications are rare in education journals with one estimate showing that only 0.13% of education articles are replications [62].”
InfluentialStudent Manual Replication Assignment EdPsy 2018-2019.pdf
de Jonge, M. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.23644/uu.7649072
Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Makel, M. C., Peters, S. J., Matthews, M. S., & Plucker, J. A. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Self-citationEnhancing Academic Publication Performance at Higher Education
Laksana, E. P., Masruroh, B., Hariyono, H., Wibawa, A. P., Harianti, L. R., Herdianto, R., Anggoro, B. K., Ningrum, V. S., Anugrah, P., & Oraby, G. A. E. M. (2025) · Jurnal Pembelajaran Bimbingan dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan · doi:10.17977/um065.v6.i2.2026.1
Sungur, S., Can, G., Dumlupınar, N., & ÖZDEMİR, A. (2026) · SDU International Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.33710/sduijes.1771895
Bolden, M. A., Williams, O., Humphrey, M., & Dixon, E. C. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2051-231720260000010011
The Future of Global Vocational Teacher Education With Technology-Enhanced Learning
Tugwell, O. O. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5865-9.ch011
A Replication Study of Non‐Incentivized Scenario‐Based Experiments
Jackson, I., Brooks, L., Eckerd, S., & Carter, C. R. (2026) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.70067
Better for self or better than others, the secret of relative position in behavior
Celse, J., & Chang, K. (2026) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1108/rbe-12-2025-0126
Metadata
- Authors
- Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 304-316
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2139319950
- Semantic Scholar
- 493a2e93117a876871ac446b26acf47c50ea2cef
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 68.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- replication, direct replication, educational research, publishing history, research credibility, methodological quality, replication success, educational periodicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review