The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty: Replication in the Education Sciences
Abstract
Despite increased attention to methodological rigor in education research, the field has focused heavily on experimental design and not on the merit of replicating important results. The present study analyzed the complete publication history of the current top 100 education journals ranked by 5-year impact factor and found that only 0.13% of education articles were replications. Contrary to previous findings in medicine, but similar to psychology, the majority of education replications successfully replicated the original studies. However, replications were significantly less likely to be successful when there was no overlap in authorship between the original and replicating articles. The results emphasize the importance of third-party, direct replications in helping education research improve its ability to shape education policy and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Novel or innovative results are more likely to be published than replications or incremental extensions of existing findings 13-15 .”
From Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedLancet, T. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60175-4 · Cited by 500
Retracted(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Agresti, A. (2006) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/0470114754 · Cited by 6,775
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Moffitt, R. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.660 · Cited by 4,888
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 5×
“Using health care research as an example, Ioannidis (2005a), in a review of highly cited medical publications (i.e., those cited more than 1,000 times), found only 44% of replications produced results similar to the original study.”
ResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1037//0003–066x.49.12.997 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins H. M., 1985, Changing order
- Kane E. J., 1984, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 23, 3
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 1
- Neuliep J. W., 1993, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21
- Perspectives on Psychological Science. (2012). Special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Retrieved from http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6.toc · DOI · Paper page
- Powell K., 2007, PLoS Biology, 12, 2748
- Rhine J. B., 1997, Extra-sensory perception
- Ritchie S. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 346
- 10.1037//0033–2909.86.3.638 · DOI · Paper page
- Rotton J., 1995, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 1
- Simons D. J., 2012, Psychologist, 25, 349
- Simons D. J., 2014, Perspectives on Psychological Science. APS Observer, 27, 16
- Williams S. N., 2012, Science, 336, 801
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 608
Saparbayeva, E., Abdualiyeva, M., Torebek, Y., Kostangeldinova, A., Tursynbayev, A., Takibayeva, G., & Sabalakhova, A. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2461978 · Cited by 11
“This replication of positive effects aligns with Makel and Plucker ’ s (2014) emphasis on reproducibility in educational research and Zhanys et al. ’ s (2020) findings on the importance of integrated approaches to mathematics education in Kazakhstan.”
Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Atomic Models
Wiener, J. (2020) · European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education · doi:10.12973/ejmse.1.2.67 · Cited by 11
Open Game Data: A Technical Infrastructure for Open Science with Educational Games
Gagnon, D., & Swanson, L. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44751-8_1 · Cited by 11
Smith, P., Frazier, P., Lee, J., & Chang, R. (2017) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2017.1407767 · Cited by 11
“…the PISA reading literacy test is used as a basis for numerous comparisons of youth across the globe, this previous and parallel examination of 2009 PISA reading literacy (Smith, Cheema, & Kumi-Yeboah, 2016) to arrive at more definitive, accurate and representative results (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
MethodFebrian, A., & Lawanto, O. (2018) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v11n12p26 · Cited by 11
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Alberti, G., Chiariello, V., Campanella, C., Grillo, G., & Tagliente, V. (2019) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445519850747 · Cited by 11
Realizing the promises of replication studies in education
Morrison, K. (2019) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2020.1838300 · Cited by 11
Considerations for Evidence Frameworks in Education Research
Taylor, J. A., Davis, E. B., & Michaelson, L. (2021) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x20985077 · Cited by 11
“Studies replicated without researcher independence are more likely than independent replications to report favorable findings, suggesting that conflict of interest can have an effect on the results of a study (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundResultIn Pursuit of a Replication Culture in Mathematics Education
Star, J. R. (2021) · Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1163/26670127-01010003 · Cited by 13
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in CSCL
Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kollar, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_27 · Cited by 15
“4 The Future: Reproducibility, Replications, and Open Science Over the last decade, concerns have grown that a large number of reported social research fi ndings may be dif fi cult to replicate by independent researchers (Makel and Plucker 2014) or may even be false (Ioannidis 2005).”
InfluentialDees, J. A., Bussard, C., & Momsen, J. L. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-03-0058 · Cited by 10
“the same institution, which limits the robustness of the claims due to potential experimenter bias (Makel and Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundIs the educational ‘what works’ agenda working? Critical methodological developments
Pampaka, M., Williams, J. S., & Homer, M. (2016) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2016.1205817 · Cited by 11
“How many study findings would replicate (see Makel and Plucker 2014)?”
Golden, G. (2020) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/9f127490-en · Cited by 25
Examining the Impact of a First Grade Whole Number Intervention by Group Size
Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Sutherland, M., Kosty, D. B., Turtura, J. E., & Smolkowski, K. (2022) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2022.2093299 · Cited by 10
“The importance of systematic replication is garnering increased focus (Chhin et al., 2018; National Science Foundation et al., 2018) to address the current lack of replication research (Cook et al., 2015) and it’s perceived value (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundYe, X. S., & Hu, G. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103236 · Cited by 13
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Campodonico, F., Perilli, V., Alberti, G., Ricci, C., & Miglino, O. (2017) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-017-0047-z · Cited by 10
“New studies with additional participants will have to determine the reliability of the present data and, based on the outcome, the possibility of recommending the program reported for use within regular education, rehabilitation, and care contexts (Kazdin 2011; Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundKilgus, S. P., Eklund, K. R., von der Embse, N. P., Weist, M., Barber, A., Kaul, M., & Dodge, S. (2020) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/1534508420909527 · Cited by 11
“…psychology has several far-reaching implications, it is particularly problematic for applied disciplines, which rely upon replication research to identify those practices in which schools can place confidence regarding their capacity to enhance student educational outcomes (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundAn Integrative Qualitative Framework: Improving Research Through Strategic Mapping
Coker, D. C. (2023) · International Research in Education · doi:10.5296/ire.v11i1.20921 · Cited by 18
Defining and assessing FoI in a large-scale randomized trial: Core components of values affirmation
Bradley, D. N., Crawford, E., & Dahill-Brown, S. E. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.04.002 · Cited by 9
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Pinto, K., & Chiapparino, C. (2017) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317517698793 · Cited by 10
“Fifth, the positive activity engagement outcomes described earlier, although highly encouraging as to the potential impact of a technology-aided program in daily contexts, could hardly be considered sufficient to guarantee its adoption within those contexts.(32,42) In fact, such an adoption might be based not only on…”
BackgroundResultBryan, J. A., Kim, J., & Shi, Q. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58179-8_11 · Cited by 10
Kaufman, J. C., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617753947 · Cited by 11
Cai, J., Hwang, S., & Robison, V. (2019) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_21 · Cited by 10
Self-Regulation Strategies in an Engineering Design Project
Lawanto, O., Febrian, A., Butler, D. L., & Mina, M. (2019) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v12n5p133 · Cited by 10
“Although replication studies are currently underappreciated, they are “essential to moving toward a more reliable and trustworthy understanding of educational environments” (Makel & Plucker, 2014, p. 313).”
BackgroundLancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Desideri, L., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F., & Chiariello, V. (2019) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-019-00120-2 · Cited by 10
Herrington, C. D., & Maynard, R. A. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19891441 · Cited by 10
Collier, D., Fitzpatrick, D., Brehm, C., Hearit, K. M., & Beach, A. L. (2020) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-020-09612-w · Cited by 14
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Zimbaro, C., & Chiariello, V. (2017) · British Journal of Visual Impairment · doi:10.1177/0264619617715497 · Cited by 10
“In light of this limitation, new studies with additional participants seem warranted to determine the strength and generality of the evidence available (Kazdin, 2011; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundHiggins, S. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139519618 · Cited by 26
Huff, M., & Bongartz, E. C. (2023) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459231156419 · Cited by 11
“…Glasziou et al., 2014; Ioannidis et al., 2014) and the replication crises in psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015), the educational sciences (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Plucker & Makel, 2021; Shaver & Norton, 1980), the social sciences (Camerer et al., 2018), cancer research (Errington…”
BackgroundGregory, A., Huang, F. L., & Ward-Seidel, A. R. (2024) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584241288525 · Cited by 31
“Recent articles in psychology and education sciences have highlighted the importance of replicating studies in order for research to influence educational policy and practice (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Campodonico, F., & Chiariello, V. (2019) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-019-00102-4 · Cited by 9
Deho, O. B., Joksimovíc, S., Liu, L., Li, J., Zhan, C., & Liu, J. (2023) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3573051.3593381 · Cited by 9
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Ferlisi, G., Zullo, V., Denitto, F., Lauta, E., Abbinante, C., et al. (2015) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1104561 · Cited by 9
Taylor, J. A., Furtak, E. M., Kowalski, S. M., Martinez, A., Slavin, R. E., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., & Wilson, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21327 · Cited by 10
de Kleine, C., & Lawton, R. (2018) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.003 · Cited by 9
Klingbeil, D. A., January, S. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-019-09331-y · Cited by 9
The Role of A/B Tests in the Study of Large-Scale Online LearningPreprint
Savi, A. O., Williams, J. J., Maris, G., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/83jsg · Cited by 9
Replication Studies Using Secondary or Nonexperimental Datasets
Huang, F. L., & Huang, A. B. (2024) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2024.2346781 · Cited by 8
“Whereas replications may at times be thought of as redundant, several authors have discussed the importance of replication studies (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Nosek et al., 2015).”
Is Sexual Racism Still Really Racism? Revisiting Callander et al. (2015) in the USA
Smith, J. G., Sage, A. J., McGlenn, M., Robbins, J., & Garmon, S. L. (2022) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-022-02351-2 · Cited by 9
“Makel and Plucker (2014) found that only 0.13% of the papers in top education journals were replication studies.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhy replicate? Systematic review of calls for replication in Language Teaching
Yamashita, T., & Neiriz, R. (2024) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100091 · Cited by 8
Structured Reporting Guidelines for Classroom Intervention Research
Hill, H. C., Lynch, K. S., & Polanin, J. R. (2025) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2025.2470322 · Cited by 11
“These features and characteristics may be necessary for successful replication (e.g., Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Kuhl, P., Kocaj, A., & Stanat, P. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000283 · Cited by 9
Kossyvaki, L., Meadan, H., Cristescu, L., Alharbi, H., Sands, M. M., & Tuite, D. (2022) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2022.102044 · Cited by 9
A cautionary note on aggregation in educational psychology and beyond
Krammer, G. (2023) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593543231172495 · Cited by 8
“This lack has been criticized in educational psychology (Makel & Plucker, 2014; Plucker & Makel, 2021; Rost & Bienefeld, 2019; Travers et al., 2016), and unfortunately ties into psychol-ogy’s tradition of preferring novel and statistically significant findings over thoroughly researched findings…”
Bohrnstedt, G. W., Ogut, B., Yee, D., & Bai, Y. (2023) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584231184426 · Cited by 7
“As noted by Makel and Plucker (2014): “If education research is to be relied upon to develop sound policy and practice, then conducting replications on important findings is essential to moving toward a more reliable and trustworthy understanding of educational environments” (p. 313).”
BackgroundHowell, E., Kaminski, R., & Pirolla, T. (2024) · Language and Literacy · doi:10.20360/langandlit29664 · Cited by 7
“We hope this project method will serve as a model for future research on how to be inclusive and responsive to participants and address needed elements of sustainability and replication (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
MethodRonfeldt, M., Bardelli, E., Brockman, S. L., & Mullman, H. (2019) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831219872952 · Cited by 9
“In keeping with recent calls for more replication studies in educational research (Makel & Plucker, 2014), the present study replicates and extends the Goldhaber et al. study in a different teacher labor market and state context.”
ResultOpen Science als Beitrag zur Qualität in der Bildungsforschung
Krammer, G., & Svecnik, E. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s35834-020-00286-z · Cited by 11
Reproducible Analyses in Education Research
LeBeau, B. C., Ellison, S., & Aloe, A. M. (2021) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x20985076 · Cited by 9
“…stronger topics of interest in education research and feel the field will be enhanced by this discussion in a similar way that discussion of replication has enhanced the educational literature (Hedges & Schauer, 2019a, 2019b; IES, U.S. Department of Education, & NSF, 2018; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Framework for Classifying Replication Studies in Educational Technologies Research
Christensen, R. W., Hodges, C. B., & Spector, J. M. (2021) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09532-3 · Cited by 8
“2 Background Makel and Plucker (2014) defined replication as “the purposeful repetition of previous results to corroborate or disconfirm the previous results” (p. 305).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLamm, K. W., Holder, M., Randall, N. L., Edgar, D. W., & Lamm, A. J. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061577 · Cited by 7
“As Makel and Plucker (2014) state, “If education research is to be relied upon to develop sound policy and practice, then conducting replications on important findings is essential to moving toward a more reliable and trustworthy understanding of educational environments” (p. 313).”
BackgroundSkinner, C. H., McClurg, V. M., Crewdson, M. A., Coleman, M. B., Bennett, J., Fowler, K., & Killion, J. B. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22638 · Cited by 7
Perceived aggressive monetization: why some mobile gamers won’t spend any money on in-app purchases
Salehudin, I., & Alpert, F. H. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09603-2 · Cited by 11
Replication and Reproduction in Canadian Policing Research: A Note
Huey, L., & Bennell, C. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale · doi:10.3138/cjccj.2016.e09 · Cited by 8
“One recent study that examined education research found that, out of the 164,589 studies examined, only 0.13% of them were replication attempts (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialOtten, S., Webel, C., & de Araujo, Z. (2017) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.008 · Cited by 7
Schulze, S., Lüke, T., Schröter, A., Krause, K., & Kühl, J. (2019) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-018-00034-3 · Cited by 7
Price adjustment in the London housing market
Webb, R., Watson, D., & Cook, S. (2019) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098019878349 · Cited by 7
“While perhaps most closely associated with the ‘replication crisis’ in psychology (see Open Science Collaboration, 2015), calls for replication have been witnessed in numerous disciplines (see, inter alia, Chang et al., 2017; Frank and Saxe, 2012; Makel and Plucker, 2014; McNeeley and Warner, 2015; Sukhtankar, 2017; W…”
BackgroundJapanese physical education graduate students’ learning about research skill development
Sato, T., & McKay, C. (2019) · Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education · doi:10.1080/25742981.2019.1685898 · Cited by 7
“According to Makel and Plucker (2014), many graduate students try to duplicate the theoretical application, sampling procedures, test condition using an education model (e.g. sport education or teaching games for understanding), and method of analysis from past studies.”
BackgroundLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Resta, E., Campodonico, F., Alberti, G., & Chiariello, V. (2020) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-020-09737-x · Cited by 7
Evidence-informed practice in assessment: forging the nexus between research, policy & practice
Davari-Torshizi, M. (2020) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2020.1815647 · Cited by 7
“Most importantly, in order to rely on evidence as to develop valid policy and practice, doing replications on important findings is necessary and likely to lead to a more solid understanding of educational environments (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Buonocunto, F., Devalle, G., Trimarchi, P. D., Navarro, J., & Lanzilotti, C. (2018) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-018-0064-6 · Cited by 7
“Indeed, study 1 was to evaluate the effectiveness of a microswitchaided program in helping ten new participants increase functional responding to control preferred stimulation events (Kazdin 2011; Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundGeel, V., & Keuning, T. (2016) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036541190 · Cited by 14
Stadler, M. J., Brandl, L., & Greiff, S. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12847 · Cited by 6
Lawson, J. L., O’Dwyer, L. M., Dearing, E., Raczek, A. E., Foley, C., Khanani, N., Walsh, M. E., & Leigh, Y. R. (2024) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584241292072 · Cited by 6
“…a significant contribution to a growing evidence base on integrated student support in that it serves as a conceptual replication and extends the cumulative knowledge about integrated student support (Chhin et al., 2018; Derksen & Morawski, 2022; Duncan et al., 2014; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Comment on “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu
Hennessey, B. A. (2015) · Creativity Theories – Research – Applications · doi:10.1515/ctra-2015-0004 · Cited by 6
“In August of this year, Makel and Plucker (2014) reported that only 13% of education articles published in the field’s top 100 journals are replications and argued convincingly for a turn-around of this trend; while Beghetto (2014) expanded upon recent critiques of the state of social science…”
BackgroundPrimer on Reproducible Research in R: Enhancing Transparency and Scientific Rigor
Siraji, M. A., & Rahman, M. (2023) · Clocks & Sleep · doi:10.3390/clockssleep6010001 · Cited by 6
“How to attain this balance is an issue of high debate [10,11].”
BackgroundAcademic Culture: Its Meaning, Measure and Contribution to Student Learning
Leithwood, K. A., Sun, J., Zhang, S., & Hua, C. (2024) · Journal of School Leadership · doi:10.1177/10526846241258199 · Cited by 11
Homer, M. (2020) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09990-x · Cited by 6
Clarke, B., Turtura, J. E., Lesner, T. A., Cook, M. A., Smolkowski, K., Kosty, D. B., & Doabler, C. T. (2022) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029221088938 · Cited by 6
“…research supports the generalizability of hypotheses generated from initial research (Schmidt, 2009) and serves not only to affirm scientific understanding of the findings replicated but also to expose methodological biases and insufficiencies within an initial study (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSocial and Emotional Learning and Early Literacy Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study of RULER
Bailey, C. S., Martinez, O., & DiDomizio, E. E. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040397 · Cited by 12
Promoting low-income preschoolers’ school readiness through a text messaging intervention
Baroody, A. E., Ferretti, C. K., & Larsen, R. (2018) · Journal of Children and Poverty · doi:10.1080/10796126.2018.1517939 · Cited by 9
“Yet replication is an important aspect of the scientific method and is essential to providing trustworthy evidence to guide education policies and practices (Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundReplicating a study about children’s drawings concerning radiation
Plötz, T., & Hollenthoner, F. (2019) · Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences · doi:10.4995/muse.2019.10390 · Cited by 6
“Makel and Plucker (2014) stated the importance of replication studies in education research.”
BackgroundProcedural versus content‐related hints for word problem solving: an exploratory study
de Kock, W. D., & Harskamp, E. G. (2016) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12148 · Cited by 6
Phelps-Gregory, C. M., & Spitzer, S. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_12 · Cited by 7
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Vincenti, A., Buonocunto, F., Susco, V., Lanzilotti, C., & Navarro, J. (2019) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-192811 · Cited by 6
“New studies with additional participants are needed to assess the effectiveness of the new upgraded technology version as well as its adaptation and determine the reliability of the data obtained in this study (Kazdin, 2011; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Replication Studies in Educational Technology
(2015) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0862-2 · Cited by 6
Jansson, A., Sundblad, G. B., Lundvall, S., Bjärsholm, D., & Norberg, J. R. (2022) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2021-0270 · Cited by 5
Eklund, K. R., Kilgus, S. P., Willenbrink, J. B., Collins, B., Gill, N., Weist, M., Porter, J., Lewis, T. J., Mitchell, B. S., & Wills, H. P. (2022) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/07342829221116807 · Cited by 5
“…crisis within psychology has several far-reaching implications, it is particularly problematic for applied disciplines (e.g., school psychology) that rely on replication research to identify tools and practices that schools can confidently use to best serve children (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundPivoting Training and Coaching for an Early Numeracy Intervention During COVID-19
Fainstein, D., Clarke, B., Kosty, D. B., Cycyk, L. M., Turtura, J. E., & Doabler, C. T. (2024) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-024-01713-7 · Cited by 5
“Author overlap presents an opportunity for unintentional bias (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
Pfeiffer, D. L., Thompson, A. R., Ciullo, B., Hirsch, M. E., Amin, M. E., Ford, A. L. B., Riccardi, J. S., & Kearney, E. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00378 · Cited by 5
Nie, A., Chandak, Y., Suzara, M., Malik, A., Woodrow, J., Peng, M., Sahami, M., Brunskill, E., & Piech, C. (2024) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3698205.3733960 · Cited by 47
Two Additional Suggested Reforms to Encourage Replication Studies in Educational Research
Warne, R. T. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x14562294 · Cited by 5
Does Test Item Performance Increase with Test-to-Standards Alignment?
Traynor, A. (2017) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2017.1344092 · Cited by 5
“We intended the item difficulty model for the TIMSS item response data to serve as a partial operational replication (e.g., Makel & Plucker, 2014) of the NAEP data analysis.”
MethodDisrupting (Mis)Representation in the Literacy Achievement of “(Under)Performing” Youth
Smith, P., Warrican, S. J., Yeboah, A. K., Cheema, J., & Alleyne, M. L. (2019) · Journal of Education and Development in the Caribbean · doi:10.46425/j518021775 · Cited by 5
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Desideri, L., Alberti, G., Chiariello, V., & Nozzolillo, A. (2020) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-020-00169-4 · Cited by 5
Regional differences in educational achievement: A replication study of municipality data
Boman, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.854342 · Cited by 7
“This article underlines the importance of replication in educational research (Makel and Plucker, 2014) as it contributes with a replication of the relationships found in Boman (2022b) by utilizing similar data sources, analytical strategies, dependent, and independent variables.”
MethodMethod considerations for school psychology from longitudinal research on gifted students
Wai, J., Kell, H. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2023) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101269 · Cited by 8
White, M., & Stovner, R. B. (2024) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.121436 · Cited by 7
Assessing Novices’ Game Performance in Rugby Union: The Rugby Attack Assessment Instrument (RAAI)
Llobet-Martí, B., López‐Ros, V., Barrera‐Gómez, J., & Comino, J. (2016) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.2014-0134 · Cited by 5
“Although a recent research shows very low repeatability of studies (Makel & Plucker, 2014), we have constructed the IP in a way that provides objective measures of the RAAI, which favours replication, even in other contexts of educational research.”
ResultLancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Buonocunto, F., Navarro, J., Lanzilotti, C., & Alberti, G. (2016) · International Journal on Disability and Human Development · doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0022 · Cited by 5
Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Zimbaro, C., Chiariello, V., & Campodonico, F. (2017) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-017-0032-6 · Cited by 5
“Obviously, new studies with additional participants are needed to determine the strength of the present findings (Kazdin 2011; Makel and Plucker 2014).”
BackgroundReplicable quantitative psychological and educational research: Possibility or pipe dream?
Cantley, I. (2022) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2090926 · Cited by 5
“In an analysis of the full publication history of the top 100 education journals according to 2011 5-year impact factors, Makel and Plucker (2014) reported that just 0.13% of the 164,589 articles that had been published (i.e. 221 articles) involved replication studies (which were direct…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialZarate, K., & Barcus, C. L. (2022) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-022-00646-5 · Cited by 5
“Moreover, trainings must provide clear objectives with replicable methods, so that learners gain the necessary information to implement procedures accurately and future researchers can confirm results through replication (Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
BackgroundQuackery in Educational Research
Robinson, D. H., & Levin, J. R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235631.003 · Cited by 5
Knutas, A., Hynninen, T., Wolff, A., & Khakurel, J. (2019) · Cited by 5
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Grillo, G., Desideri, L., Alberti, G., & Campodonico, F. (2020) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-200268 · Cited by 5
Promoting conceptual replications in educational research
Cai, J. (2022) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2021.2022313 · Cited by 5
The effects of reflection on seventh grade social studies student learning and perception
Denton, D. W., & Ellis, A. K. (2023) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2020.1835616 · Cited by 4
“Indeed, Makel and Plucker (2014) have provided sound justification for replication research, such as noting that replication studies are useful for developing sound practice.”
BackgroundHasibuan, S., Yustina, Y., & Wahyuni, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1705676 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 304-316
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2139319950
- Semantic Scholar
- 493a2e93117a876871ac446b26acf47c50ea2cef
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 68.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- replication, direct replication, educational research, publishing history, research credibility, methodological quality, replication success, educational periodicals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review