The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education
Abstract
As evidence becomes increasingly important in educational policy, it is essential to understand how research design might contribute to reported effect sizes in experiments evaluating educational programs. A total of 645 studies from 12 recent reviews of evaluations of preschool, reading, mathematics, and science programs were studied. Effect sizes were roughly twice as large for published articles, small-scale trials, and experimenter-made measures, compared to unpublished documents, large-scale studies, and independent measures, respectively. Effect sizes were significantly higher in quasi-experiments than in randomized experiments. Excluding tutoring studies, there were no significant differences in effect sizes between elementary and middle/high studies. Regression analyses found that effects of all factors maintained after controlling for all other factors. Explanations for the effects of methodological features on effect sizes are discussed, as are implications for evidence-based policy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, published studies in higher rated journals may report larger effects than unpublished reports due to biases in publishing only the stronger associations and significant results (Cheung & Slavin, 2016).”
From Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta‐analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as Cheung & Slavin, 2016
In the citing paper
“major factors that have consistently shown to affect meta‐analytic results in other fields of research are study characteristics, such as the year and quality of the study (Cheung & Slavin, 2016).”
From Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta‐analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as Cheung & Slavin, 2016
In the citing paper
“pre-to post effects generally are much larger than in randomized controlled studies [33,34]”
From Virtual reality exposure therapy for fear of spiders: an open trial and feasibility study of a new treatment for arachnophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Similar effect sizes are substantial; Cheung and Slavin (2016) find, in their meta-analysis of 197 RCTs, an average effect size on academic achievement of 0.16 standard deviations.”
From The effect of school closures on standardised student test outcomes (2022) · cites this paper as Cheung and Slavin (2016)
Citations
Cites
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028228 · Cited by 1,782
Espinosa, J. C. (2004) · Cited by 939
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001 · Cited by 792
Self-citationFerguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612459059 · Cited by 603
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325998 · Cited by 599
Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions
Hopewell, S., McDonald, S., Clarke, M. J., & Egger, M. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000010.pub3 · Cited by 598
Slavin, R. E. (2008) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08314117 · Cited by 560
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Baron J., 2003, How to assess whether an educational intervention has been “proven effective” in rigorous research
- Buck S., 2015, Why government needs more randomized control trials: Refuting the myths
- Liao Y. K. C., 1999, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 255
- Nussle J., 2014, Moneyball for government
- Pearson P. D., 2005, The effects of technology on reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendation for policy
- Slavin R. E., 2013, Education Week, 32, 24
- What Works Clearinghouse, 2014, Procedures and standards handbook
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions
Kraft, M. A. (2020) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x20912798 · Cited by 1,281
Mindsets: A View From Two Eras
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618804166 · Cited by 1,259
What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000794 · Cited by 868
Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher, A. K., Eveleigh, A., McCarthy, M., et al. (2023) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13968 · Cited by 636
Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis
van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kester, L. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003 · Cited by 735
Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A., Kim, E. Y., & Xie, C. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001 · Cited by 643
Self-citationThe effect of school closures on standardised student test outcomes
Maldonado, J. E., & De Witte, K. (2022) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3754 · Cited by 499
Financial Education Affects Financial Knowledge and Downstream Behaviors
Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2022) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.022 · Cited by 508
Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms‐Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366 · Cited by 560
The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies
Raposa, E. B., Rhodes, J., Stams, G. J. J. M., Card, N., Burton, S., Schwartz, S., Sykes, L. A. Y., Kanchewa, S., Kupersmidt, J., & Hussain, S. (2019) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-00982-8 · Cited by 366
Beyond small, medium, or large: points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes
Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V., & Van Dooren, W. (2019) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4 · Cited by 302
Financial education in schools: A meta-analysis of experimental studies
Kaiser, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2019) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101930 · Cited by 328
Rigorous Large-Scale Educational RCTs Are Often Uninformative: Should We Be Concerned?
Lortie-Forgues, H., & Inglis, M. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19832850 · Cited by 234
Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3 · Cited by 579
Provider communication and HPV vaccine uptake: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Oh, N. L., Biddell, C. B., Rhodes, B. E., & Brewer, N. T. (2021) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106554 · Cited by 248
Reading for Writing: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions on Writing
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B. J., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A. A., Barkel, A., Kavanaugh, C., & Talukdar, J. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317746927 · Cited by 250
Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293 · Cited by 300
Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta‐Analysis
Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A. A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B. J., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.194 · Cited by 196
Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test
Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Herwegen, J. V., & Anders, J. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231217480 · Cited by 383
Smithers, L. G., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Davies, N. M., Davey Smith, G., & Lynch, J. W. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0461-x · Cited by 175
Unrau, N. J., Rueda, R. S., Son, E., Polanin, J. R., Lundeen, R. J., & Muraszewski, A. K. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317743199 · Cited by 210
Van Dam, L., Smit, D., Wildschut, B., Branje, S. J. T., Rhodes, J. E., Assink, M., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2018) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12248 · Cited by 174
“Finally, although typically unexamined in the mentoring literature, major factors that have consistently shown to affect meta-analytic results in other fi elds of research are study characteristics, such as the year and quality of the study (Cheung & Slavin, 2016).”
BackgroundTo Flip or Not to Flip? A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Flipped Learning in Higher Education
Bredow, C. A., Roehling, P. V., Knorp, A. J., & Sweet, A. M. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211019122 · Cited by 266
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Viveros, B. S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349 · Cited by 203
Zhang, Q., Wang, J., & Neitzel, A. J. (2022) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-022-01684-4 · Cited by 156
Brunsek, A., Perlman, M., McMullen, E., Falenchuk, O., Fletcher, B. A., Nocita, G., Kamkar, N., & Shah, P. S. (2020) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.03.003 · Cited by 166
Socioeconomic status and school absenteeism: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
Sosu, E., Dare, S., Goodfellow, C., & Klein, M. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3291 · Cited by 155
Chen, G., Chan, C. K. K., Chan, K. K. H., Clarke, S. N., & Resnick, L. Β. (2020) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269 · Cited by 130
Sun, T., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., & Liu, L. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100817 · Cited by 142
Effects of digital games on student motivation in mathematics: A meta‐analysis in K‐12
Fadda, D., Pellegrini, M., Vivanet, G., & Zandonella Callegher, C. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12618 · Cited by 135
Jiang, M. Y., Jong, M. S., Lau, W. W. F., Chai, C. S., Liu, K. S.-X., & Park, M. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1789171 · Cited by 118
A Synthesis of Quantitative Research on Reading Programs for Secondary Students
Baye, A., Neitzel, A. J., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2018) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.229 · Cited by 102
Self-citationA Synthesis of Quantitative Research on Programs for Struggling Readers in Elementary Schools
Neitzel, A. J., Lake, C., Pellegrini, M., & Slavin, R. E. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.379 · Cited by 149
Self-citationTäschner, J., Dicke, T., Reinhold, S., & Holzberger, D. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231221499 · Cited by 175
Wang, X., Huang, R., Sommer, M., Pei, B., Shidfar, P., Rehman, M. S., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Martin, F. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241240459 · Cited by 170
Cheang, R., Gillions, A., & Sparkes, E. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01413-9 · Cited by 95
Rith‐Najarian, L., Mesri, B., Park, A. L., Sun, M. M. C., Chavira, D. A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2018) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2018.05.006 · Cited by 96
Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers
Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010 · Cited by 95
Financial Education Affects Financial Knowledge and Downstream Behaviors
Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27057 · Cited by 103
Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis
Pellegrini, M., Lake, C., Neitzel, A. J., & Slavin, R. E. (2021) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858420986211 · Cited by 143
Self-citationAchievement of learners receiving UDL instruction: A meta-analysis
King‐Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Evmenova, A. S., Rao, K., Mergen, R. L., Owen, L. S., & Strimel, M. M. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103956 · Cited by 141
Martín, F. D. F., Tirado, J. L. A., & Torres, M. H. (2020) · Psicologí a Educativa · doi:10.5093/psed2020a11 · Cited by 111
Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009 · Cited by 108
Effective Components of Social Emotional Learning Programs: A Meta-analysis
Shi, J., & Cheung, A. (2024) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-024-01942-7 · Cited by 105
Self-citationSchoenherr, J., Strohmaier, A., & Schukajlow, S. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100639 · Cited by 170
Rogde, K., Hagen, Å. M. M., Melby‐Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2019) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1059 · Cited by 107
Kim, Y., Mok, S. Y., & Seidel, T. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100327 · Cited by 104
Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9437-7 · Cited by 80
Talan, T., Doğan, Y., & Batdı, V. (2020) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1743798 · Cited by 95
Mitigating Illusory Results through Preregistration in Education
Gehlbach, H., & Robinson, C. D. (2017) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2017.1387950 · Cited by 82
Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.003 · Cited by 96
Self-citationHwang, H., Cabell, S. Q., & Joyner, R. E. (2021) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2021.1954005 · Cited by 101
Game‐based learning has good chemistry with chemistry education: A three‐level meta‐analysis
Hu, Y., Gallagher, T. J., Wouters, P., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Kester, L. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21765 · Cited by 109
Effect of blended learning on student performance in K‐12 settings: A meta‐analysis
Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12696 · Cited by 106
Mathematics Interventions for Upper Elementary and Secondary Students: A Meta-Analysis of Research
Stevens, E. A., Rodgers, M. A., & Powell, S. R. (2017) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932517731887 · Cited by 73
Schmid, R. F., Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Pickup, D. I., & Abrami, P. C. (2023) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142 · Cited by 70
Effects of the Jigsaw method on student educational outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses
Drouet, O., Lentillon‐Kaestner, V., & Margas, N. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216437 · Cited by 143
Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis
Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953 · Cited by 97
Effectiveness of flipped classroom practices in teaching of science: a mixed research synthesis
Doğan, Y., Batdı, V., & Yaşar, M. D. (2021) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1909553 · Cited by 78
Digital vs. in-person financial education: What works best for Generation Z?
Sconti, A. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.001 · Cited by 81
Wang, F., Cheung, A. C. K., Neitzel, A. J., & Chai, C. S. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241255621 · Cited by 64
Self-citationMyers, J. A., Witzel, B. S., Powell, S. R., Li, H., Pigott, T., Xin, Y. P., & Hughes, E. M. (2022) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211070049 · Cited by 96
Spatial thinking as the missing piece in mathematics curricula
Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Hawes, Z. C. K., & Mix, K. S. (2022) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-022-00128-9 · Cited by 64
Fan, K., & See, B. H. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101145 · Cited by 72
Verbruggen, S., Depaepe, F., & Torbeyns, J. (2020) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100220 · Cited by 74
On the value of data-based decision making in education: The evidence from six intervention studies
Visscher, A. J. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100899 · Cited by 61
Jitendra, A. K., Alghamdi, A., Edmunds, R., McKevett, N. M., Mouanoutoua, J., & Roesslein, R. (2020) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402920969187 · Cited by 72
COVID-19 Vaccine and Social Media in the U.S.: Exploring Emotions and Discussions on Twitter
Karami, A., Zhu, M., Goldschmidt, B., Boyajieff, H. R., & Najafabadi, M. M. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9101059 · Cited by 60
Tlili, A., Garzón, J., Salha, S. H., Huang, R., Xu, L., Burgos, D., Denden, M., Farrell, O., Farrow, R., Bozkurt, A., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3 · Cited by 110
Does co-teaching improve academic achievement for students with disabilities? A meta-analysis
King‐Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Berkeley, S. L., & Strogilos, V. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100405 · Cited by 75
Evidence‐based juvenile justice programs and practices: A critical review
Elliott, D. S., Buckley, P. R., Gottfredson, D. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Tolan, P. H. (2020) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12520 · Cited by 57
Wang, F., Zhou, X., Li, K., Cheung, A. C. K., & Ming, T. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2470319 · Cited by 71
Self-citationSynergies of Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Systematic Review of Student Outcomes
Blumenstein, M. (2020) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2020.73.3 · Cited by 54
Alrawashdeh, G. S., Fyffe, S., Azevedo, R. F. L., & Castillo, N. M. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100587 · Cited by 83
Chen, S., & Cheung, A. (2025) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737 · Cited by 134
Self-citationGrowth-Mindset Intervention Delivered by Teachers Boosts Achievement in Early Adolescence
Porter, T., Molina, D. C., Cimpian, A., Roberts, S., Fredericks, A., Blackwell, L. S., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211061109 · Cited by 75
Capin, P., Walker, M. A., Vaughn, S. R., & Wanzek, J. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9429-z · Cited by 52
Zinsser, K. M., Gordon, R. A., & Xue, J. (2021) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.02.001 · Cited by 70
Extracurricular activity profiles and wellbeing in middle childhood: A population-level study
Oberle, E., Ji, X. R., Magee, C., Guhn, M., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Gadermann, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218488 · Cited by 68
Mok, S. Y., Rupp, D., & Holzberger, D. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100552 · Cited by 59
A large-scale field experiment shows giving advice improves academic outcomes for the advisor
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908779116 · Cited by 49
Neglect of publication bias compromises meta-analyses of educational research
Ropovik, I., Adamkovic, M., & Greger, D. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252415 · Cited by 55
Chiva-Bartoll, Ò., Miravet, L. M., & Salvador-García, C. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104841 · Cited by 58
Working Out What Works: The Case of the Education Endowment Foundation in England
Edovald, T., & Nevill, C. (2020) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/2096531120913039 · Cited by 49
Commercially Developed Tests of Reading Comprehension: Gold Standard or Fool’s Gold?
Clemens, N. H., & Fuchs, D. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.415 · Cited by 53
Ogbuanya, T. C., & Onele, N. O. (2018) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2018.1492283 · Cited by 50
Alcalá, F. D. R., Tirado, J. L. A., Martín, F. D. F., López-Lechuga, R., Barrios, E., & Vázquez, V. P. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.003 · Cited by 66
Xie, C., Cheung, A., Lau, W. W. F., & Slavin, R. E. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101565 · Cited by 49
Self-citationHew, K. F., Bai, S., Huang, W., Dawson, P., Du, J., Huang, G., Jia, C., & Khongjan, T. (2021) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.6475 · Cited by 72
Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196 · Cited by 80
Self-citationWolf, B., & Harbatkin, E. (2023) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2022.2071364 · Cited by 45
Schepper, A. D., Clycq, N., & Kyndt, E. (2022) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/08948453221077674 · Cited by 42
Effective secondary science programs: A best‐evidence synthesis
Cheung, A., Slavin, R. E., Kim, E. Y., & Lake, C. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21338 · Cited by 49
Self-citationAlegre, F., Miravet, L. M., Maroto, A., & Valentín, G. L. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02491 · Cited by 52
Improving Writing Skills of Students in Turkey: a Meta-analysis of Writing Interventions
Graham, S., TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., & Kaldırım, A. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09639-0 · Cited by 59
Garrett, R., Citkowicz, M., & Williams, R. (2019) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x19830634 · Cited by 48
Short and long-term effects of a mathematics tablet intervention for low performing second graders.
Hallstedt, M. H., Klingberg, T., & Ghaderi, A. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000264 · Cited by 50
Williams, R. T., Citkowicz, M., Miller, D. I., Lindsay, J., & Walters, K. (2022) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2021.2009072 · Cited by 50
Vembye, M. H., Weiss, F., & Bhat, B. H. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231186588 · Cited by 82
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 283-292
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2470242385
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 26.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- effect size, research design, methodological characteristics, educational program evaluation, randomized experiments, quasi-experiments, unpublished research, preschool programs, reading programs, mathematics programs, science programs, evidence-based policy, publication bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review