Cited by 741Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and InfluencesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/Performance Measures

Hansford, B. C., Hattie, J. A.·1982·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the relationship between the various self-measures and measures of performance and achievement. The statistical results of 128 studies are transformed to a common measure, namely, correlation coefficients. These studies represent a total sample of 202,823 persons and produce a data base of 1,136 correlations between self-ratings and performance measures. A range in the relationship of —.77 to .96 was reported with an “average” correlation of .21. It was found that this average relationship was modified by a number of variables. The more significant modifiers of the average relationship were the grade-level of subjects, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, ability of subjects, self-term used in the study, name of self-test used, type and name of performance/achievement measures, and the reliability of both the self-ratings and performance/achievement measures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543052001123

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. O’Malley PM, 1976, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association
  2. Rubin R, 1976, The Coopersmith self-esteem inventory related to academic achievement and school behavior
  3. Shavelson RJ, Journal of Educational Psychology
  4. Shavelson RJ, 1980, Self concept
  5. Smith ML, 1980, Education: An International Review Series, 4, 22
  6. West CK, 1973, A survey of empirical investigations
  7. White KR, 1980, Education: An International Review Series, 4, 79
  8. Wylie R, 1979, The self concept: Theory and research on selected topics, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 741

Metadata

Authors
Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1982-03
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
123-142
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2154540489
Cited by
741
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 25
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-ratings, self-assessment, achievement, performance indicators, self-efficacy, self-concept, self-perception, grade level, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, ability levels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review