The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers
Abstract
We conducted the first cost-benefit analysis of a federally financed, comprehensive early childhood program. The Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers are located in public schools and provide educational and family support services to low-income children from ages 3 to 9. Using data from a cohort of 1,539 program and comparison-group children born in 1980 who participate in the Chicago Longitudinal Study, measures of program participation were significantly associated with greater school achievement, higher rates of high school completion, and with significantly lower rates of remedial education services, juvenile delinquency, and child maltreatment. Economic analyses indicated that the measured and projected economic benefits of preschool participation, school-age participation, and extended program participation exceeded costs. In present-value 1998 dollars, the preschool program provided a return to society of $7.14 per dollar invested by increasing economic well-being and tax revenues, and by reducing public expenditures for remedial education, criminal justice treatment, and crime victims. The extended intervention program (4 to 6 years of participation) provided a return to society of $6.11 per dollar invested while the school-age program yielded a return of $1.66 per dollar invested. Findings demonstrate that an established public program can provide benefits that far exceed costs. Key elements of CPC program effectiveness include an instructional focus on literacy, opportunities for intensive parent involvement, and implementation by well-trained staff within a single administrative system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olds, D. L. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038 · Cited by 1,372
Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1024654026646 · Cited by 963
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.18.2339 · Cited by 846
Self-citation
Cited by
The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x · Cited by 1,217
The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention
Fang, X., Brown, D. S., Florence, C. S., & Mercy, J. A. (2012) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.006 · Cited by 1,122
“Special education costs Jonson-Reid et al. (2004) Reynolds et al. (2002) $7,999 $6,443 Total $210,012 $97,952 Table 2 The average lifetime cost per case of fatal child maltreatment.”
InfluentialThe Economics of Human Development and Social Mobility
Heckman, J. J., & Mosso, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753 · Cited by 940
“The technology is stage-specific, allowing for critical and sensitive periods in the formation of capabilities and the effectiveness of investment.10 This technology accommodates family formation of child preferences as in Becker & Mulligan (1997), Becker et al.”
Kautz, T., Heckman, J., Diris, R., ter Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20749 · Cited by 744
Burger, K. (2010) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.11.001 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A.
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-303
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1062
- OpenAlex
- W2118244077
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 54.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/01623737024004267
- The paper
- Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.