Cited by 308Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationMemory Processes and Influences

Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ

Rabbitt, Patrick·1991·Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Abstract

Rabbit (1968) tested the accuracy with which young adults with excellent hearing could repeat lists of numbers, words or continuous text which they heard over a system which maintained a constant ratio of white noise to speech signal irrespective of signal strength. Noise levels which allowed individual subjects correctly to repeat every word as they heard it (i.e. shadow without errors) nevertheless reduced their ability to remember what they had heard. This appeared to be because increased effort necessary to recognise words through low levels of noise prevented adequate rehearsal or elaborative encoding of material to be remembered. This finding that slight degradation of sensory input had secondary consequences on memory and comprehension of spoken material led to an interpretation of findings that 960 individuals aged from 50 to 82 years, in contrast to young adults, showed markedly better recall for word lists presented visually than for word lists presented auditorally, even when each word in each list was correctly read or repeated aloud. Audiometric screening of a sub-set of this population allowed 30 individuals with mild hearing losses (35 to 50 db) in each of the three age-decades 50 to 59, 60 to 69 and 70 to 79 years to be compared with matched controls who had pure-tone hearing losses of less than 35 db on memory for lists of 30 words presented visually or over a good-quality sound system. In both presentation modes lists were only scored if all words were corre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00016489109127274

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabbitt, P.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Rabbitt, Patrick
Venue
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Published
1991-01
Volume
111
Issue
sup476
Pages
167-176
ISSN
  • 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2251
OpenAlex
W2148974419
Cited by
308
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Oto-Laryngologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
mild hearing loss, age-related memory decline, auditory memory, word list recall, IQ, processing speed, elaborative encoding, older adults, information processing model
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Presbycusis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review