Cited by 147Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Comparative study to determine the optimal melatonin dosage form for the alleviation of jet lag

Suhner, Andrea, Schlagenhauf, Patricia, Johnson, Richard, Tschopp, Alois, Steffen, Robert·1998·Chronobiology International

Abstract

To compare the impact of various dosage forms of melatonin and placebo on jet lag symptoms, 320 volunteers who had flights over 6 to 8 time zones were recruited for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The volunteers received either melatonin 0.5-mg fast-release (FR) formulation, melatonin 5-mg FR formulation, melatonin 2-mg controlled-release (CR) formulation, or placebo. The study medication was taken once daily at bedtime during 4 days after an eastward flight. The volunteers completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS), sleep log, and symptoms questionnaires once daily and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) three times daily prior to departure and during the 4 days of medication intake postflight. A total of 234 (73.1%) participants were compliant and completed the study. The FR melatonin formulations were more effective than the slow-release formulation. The 5-mg FR formulation significantly improved the self-rated sleep quality (p < .05), shortened sleep latency (p < .05), and reduced fatigue and daytime sleepiness (p < .05) after intercontinental flight. The lower physiological dose of 0.5 mg was almost as effective as the pharmacological dose of 5.0 mg. Only the hypnotic properties of melatonin, sleep quality and sleep latency, were significantly greater with the 5.0-mg dose.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07420529808993201

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suhner, A., Schlagenhauf, P., Johnson, R., Tschopp, A., & Steffen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Suhner, Andrea
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
1998-01
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
655-666
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2112565888
Cited by
147
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universität Zürich
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
melatonin, jet lag, pharmaceutical dosage forms, controlled-release formulation, dose comparison, sleep quality, sleep latency, daytime sleepiness, fatigue, circadian rhythm
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Affect, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dosage Forms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Sleep, Travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review