Cited by 113Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Bupropion SR vs. Methylphenidate vs. Placebo for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults

Kuperman, Samuel, Perry, Paul, Gaffney, Gary, Lund, Brian, Bever-Stille, Kristine, Arndt, Stephan, Holman, Timothy, Moser, David +1 more·2001·Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Despite the increasing recognition of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults, there are few controlled trials demonstrating the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments, particularly with nonstimulants. One controlled trial found bupropion SR more effective than placebo in the treatment of ADHD adults. We conducted a controlled study to contrast the effectiveness of bupropion SR and methylphenidate to placebo in ADHD adults. A randomized, double-blind, parallel design was used in this study. Following a 7-day placebo lead-in, 30 ADHD (DSM-IV) subjects (18-60 years old) were randomized to bupropion, methylphenidate, or placebo for 7 weeks. Methylphenidate was titrated over 1 week to a maximum dose of 0.9 mg/kg/d divided into 3 doses while bupropion was titrated over 2 weeks to a maximum dose of 200 mg A.M. and 100 mg P.M. Response rates based on Clinical Global Impression improvement ratings in patients receiving bupropion, methylphenidate, and placebo were 64, 50, and 27%, respectively. The difference in response rates between active treatment and placebo was not statistically significant (p = 0.14). Neuropsychological testing demonstrated trends favoring drug treatment on measures of immediate recall and verbal fluency. While bupropion SR may be a viable clinical alternative for adults with ADHD, further investigation is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10401230109148958

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuperman, S., Perry, P., Gaffney, G., Lund, B., Bever-Stille, K., Arndt, S., Holman, T., Moser, D., & Paulsen, J.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
129-134
ISSN
1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085799036
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
adult ADHD, bupropion, methylphenidate, stimulant pharmacotherapy, placebo response, treatment response rate, neuropsychological outcomes, verbal fluency, immediate recall
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Bupropion, Treatment Outcome, Adrenergic Agents, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review