Cited by 197Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Efficacy of Methylphenidate for Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Castells, Xavier, Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni, Rigau, David, Bosch, Rosa, Nogueira, Mariana, Vidal, Xavier, Casas, Miguel·2011·CNS Drugs

Abstract

Background The efficacy of methylphenidate for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) shows wide between-study variability, which yields heterogeneous results in meta-analysis. The reasons for this variability have not been comprehensively investigated.Objectives To determine the influence of treatment-related covariates of methylphenidate for adults with ADHD by means of meta-analysis. Clinical and methodological moderators and clinical trial reporting quality were also collected to control for their potential confounding effect.Methods We searched for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of methylphenidate for adults with ADHD. The study outcome was the efficacy of methylphenidate for reducing ADHD symptom severity. Treatment-related covariates included dose, type of drug-release formulation (formulations with a continuous drug release vs those with a non-continuous drug release), dose regimen (fixed vs flexible) and treatment length. Clinical (presence of co-morbid substance use disorders [SUD]) and methodological (design and rater) covariates were also collected, in addition to clinical trial reporting quality. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each study. The analysis of the influence of methylphenidate effect modifiers was performed by means of random-effects meta-regression.Results Eighteen studies were included. Dose, type of formulation and SUD appeared to modify the efficacy of methylphenidate in the bivariate analysis. These variables were included in a multivariate meta-regression, which showed that methylphenidate, at an average dose of 57.4 mg/day, delivered by means of non-continuous-release formulations, had a moderate effect on ADHD symptoms compared with placebo (SMD 0.57-0.58). A dose-response relationship was found, indicating that efficacy could be increased by SMD 0.11-0.12 for every 10 mg increment of methylphenidate. Continuous-release formulations and co-morbid SUD appeared to reduce the efficacy of methylphenidate. Nevertheless, the effect of treatment formulation may have been confounded by co-morbid SUD, since all studies using this continuous-release formulation were conducted in dual ADHD-SUD patients. No residual heterogeneity was found.Conclusions This study shows that methylphenidate improves ADHD symptoms in adults in a dose-dependent fashion. The efficacy of methylphenidate appears to be reduced in patients with co-morbid SUD. It is unclear whether methylphenidate efficacy is influenced by the type of formulation, because the effect of this covariate is confounded by that of co-morbid SUD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11539440-000000000-00000

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychostimulants including methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and mixed amphetamine salts are efficacious in the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults.

    “Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate (MPH), dextroamphetamine, and mixed amphetamine salts are not only efficacious in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents but also, in adults.11,12”
  • The clinical effectiveness of stimulants such as methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD suggests a putative role for both dopamine and noradrenaline in the manifestation of the disorder.

    “The clinical effectiveness of stimulants such as methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD suggests a putative role for both dopamine and noradrenaline in the manifestation of the disorder (Castells et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castells, X., Ramos-Quiroga, J. A., Rigau, D., Bosch, R., Nogueira, M., Vidal, X., & Casas, M.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2011-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
157-169
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2330451900
Cited by
197
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methylphenidate, adult ADHD, dose-response relationship, substance use disorders, ADHD symptom severity, effect modifiers, meta-regression, trial reporting quality, treatment duration, dosing regimen, confounding by comorbidity, standardized mean difference
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Methylphenidate, Regression Analysis, Comorbidity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review