Cited by 37Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The defense reaction - a common denominator of coronary risk and blood-pressure in neurogenic hypertension

Julius, Stevo·1995·Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

Abstract

In addition to high blood pressure, patients with hypertension often have insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and increased sympathetic tone. An increased sympathetic tone can negatively affect glucose utilization through three distinct mechanisms; a direct beta-adrenoreceptor-mediated insulin resistance, through conversion to more insulin resistant fast twitch fibers and through alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction which may decrease the delivery of insulin and glucose to the skeletal muscle cells. The insulin resistance in turn may be responsible for the observed dyslipidemia in hypertension. The sympathetic overactivity in hypertension reflects a chronic activation of defense/vigilance reaction. The increase of cardiac output, blood pressure and insulin resistance in the course of the defense reaction are viewed as an appropriate preparatory response to facilitate muscular exercise (through higher cardiac output and increased pressure) and preserve (through insulin resistance) the optimal supply of glucose to the brain. The defense reaction may have been useful in evolution and may have offered survival advantage. In modern times with prolonged life expectancy the previously useful response (in evolutionary terms) contributes to a faster and deleterious wear and tear of the cardiovascular system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10641969509087078

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Julius, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Julius, Stevo
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
Published
1995-01
Volume
17
Issue
1-2
Pages
375-386
ISSN
  • 0148-3927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1064-1963
  • 1525-6006
OpenAlex
W2043939337
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37hl037464-10)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL37464/-SI)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5-MO1-RR-0042, M01RR000042)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
neurogenic hypertension, defense response, sympathetic nervous system, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease risk, blood pressure, cardiac output, beta-adrenergic receptors, alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction, adaptive evolution
MeSH terms
Arousal, Arteriosclerosis, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular System, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Factors, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vasoconstriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review