The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety
Open accessAbstract
Many promising therapeutic agents are limited by their inability to reach the systemic circulation, due to the excellent barrier properties of biological membranes, such as the stratum corneum (SC) of the skin or the sclera/cornea of the eye and others. The outermost layer of the skin, the SC, is the principal barrier to topically-applied medications. The intact SC thus provides the main barrier to exogenous substances, including drugs. Only drugs with very specific physicochemical properties (molecular weight < 500 Da, adequate lipophilicity, and low melting point) can be successfully administered transdermally. Transdermal delivery of hydrophilic drugs and macromolecular agents of interest, including peptides, DNA, and small interfering RNA is problematic. Therefore, facilitation of drug penetration through the SC may involve by-pass or reversible disruption of SC molecular architecture. Microneedles (MNs), when used to puncture skin, will by-pass the SC and create transient aqueous transport pathways of micron dimensions and enhance the transdermal permeability. These micropores are orders of magnitude larger than molecular dimensions, and, therefore, should readily permit the transport of hydrophilic macromolecules. Various strategies have been employed by many research groups and pharmaceutical companies worldwide, for the fabrication of MNs. This review details various types of MNs, fabrication methods and, importantly, investigations of clinical safety of MN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAllister, D. V., Wang, P. M., Davis, S. P., Park, J.-H., Canatella, P. J., Allen, M. G., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331316100 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Larrañeta, E., Lutton, R. E. M., Woolfson, A. D., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001 · Cited by 964
Self-citationAldawood, F. K., Andar, A., & Desai, S. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13162815 · Cited by 499
Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms
Sanjay, S. T., Zhou, W., Dou, M., Tavakoli, H., Ma, L., Xu, F., & Li, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.013 · Cited by 365
Vaccination into the Dermal Compartment: Techniques, Challenges, and Prospects
Hettinga, J., & Carlisle, R. (2020) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines8030534 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, R. F., Singh, T. R. R., & Woolfson, A. D.
- Venue
- Drug Delivery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 187-207
- ISSN
- 1071-7544 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0464
- OpenAlex
- W2117369764
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10717541003667798
- The paper
- Donnelly, R. F., Singh, T. R. R., & Woolfson, A. D. (2010). Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug Delivery. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717541003667798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.