Cited by 98Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Clinicians' impact on the quality of substance use disorder treatment

Najavits, Lisa M, Crits-Christoph, Paul, Dierberger, Amy·2000·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

Clinicians' impact on substance use disorder treatment has been much less studied than therapy and patient variables. Yet, in this selective review of literature, a growing body of empirical work on clinicians' impact highlights several key issues that have relevance both to clinical practice and future research. These issues include clinicians' effect on treatment retention and outcome, professional characteristics, recovery status, adherence to protocols, counter-transference, alliance, personality, beliefs about treatment, and professional practice issues. Specific recommendations are offered to help improve the quality of care clinicians provide. In particular, it is suggested that greater accountability for clinicians' performance be balanced with increased support for their very difficult role. Methodological issues in studying clinicians are also addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10826080009148253

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on therapist qualities has received little attention in the gambling field, despite promising results in the substance use literature.

    “Additionally, research on therapist qualities has received little attention in the gambling field (Dowling & Cosic, 2011), despite promising results in the substance use literature (Najavits, Crits-Christoph, & Dierberger, 2000;Vuoristo-Myllys, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Najavits, L. M., Crits-Christoph, P., & Dierberger, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Najavits, Lisa M
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
35
Issue
12-14
Pages
2161-2190
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2160061398
Cited by
97
References
102
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Falk Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5u18da007693-03, 5k02da000400-02)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02-DA00400, U18-DA07693, R01DA008631)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
addiction treatment, treatment retention, treatment outcomes, countertransference, therapeutic relationship, medication adherence, clinician support, quality of care
MeSH terms
Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Dropouts, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review