Cited by 452Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

“Seeking safety”: outcome of a new cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for women with posttraumatic stress disorder and substance dependence

Najavits, Lisa M., Weiss, Roger D., Shaw, Sarah R., Muenz, Larry R.·1998·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Women with current posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comprise 30‐59% of substance abuse treatment samples and experience a more severe course than women with either disorder alone. As yet, no effective treatment for this population has been identified. This paper reports outcome results on 17 women who completed a new manual‐based 24‐session cognitive behavioral group therapy protocol treatment, based on assessments at pretreatment, during treatment, posttreatment, and at 3‐month follow‐up. Results showed significant improvements in substance use, trauma‐related symptoms, suicide risk, suicidal thoughts, social adjustment, family functioning, problem solving, depression, cognitions about substance use, and didactic knowledge related to the treatment. Patients' treatment attendance, alliance, and satisfaction were also very strong. Treatment completers were more impaired than dropouts, yet more engaged in the treatment. Overall, our data suggest that women with PTSD and substance abuse can be helped when provided with a treatment designed for them. All results are clearly tentative, however, due to the lack of a control group, multiple comparisons, and absence of assessment of dropouts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024496427434

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Najavits, L. M., Weiss, R. D., Shaw, S. R., & Muenz, L. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Sarah R.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-07
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
437-456
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2041880469
Cited by
451
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 33
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dr. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research Trust
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02-DA 00326, K02DA000326, R01-DA08631, R01DA008631)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, substance dependence, women, group cognitive behavioral therapy, trauma-focused psychotherapy, treatment outcomes, suicide risk, social adaptation, family functioning, treatment engagement, treatment alliance, treatment satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Crime, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Personality Assessment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review