The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Outcomes in the Interdisciplinary Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Guide for Practicing Clinicians
Abstract
This chapter aims to provide as a “user’s manual” in treatment outcome evaluation and is targeted at practicing clinicians, who may not have the time, training, interest, or resources to conduct funded clinical trials as a way of evaluating treatment effectiveness. It provides a conceptual background regarding the purposes and goals of assessment, in addition to potential targets to assess in determining outcomes. The chapter is concerned with issues of measurement and details specific domains to consider when evaluating treatment outcomes. Many interdisciplinary treatment programs are behavioral or cognitive-behavioral in orientation. The principle commonality pertains to the emphasis placed on thoughts, beliefs, emotions, and other mental processes which are considered to play a contributory role in the development and maintenance of suffering. Cognitive-behavioral approaches have contributed to a line of research concerned with methods of undermining the many avoidant behavior patterns that contribute to suffering in chronic pain patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) has good evidence of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
“The SIP has been widely used in health care settings and has good evidence of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.7,58”
Citations
Cites
Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Chronic Pain
Turk, D. C. (2002) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200211000-00003 · Cited by 638
The Disparagement of Pain: Social Influences on Medical Thinking
Merskey, H., & Teasell, R. W. (2000) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2000/565309 · Cited by 32
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vowles, K. E., Witkiewitz, K., Sowden, G., & Ashworth, J. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.002 · Cited by 201
Self-citationVowles, K. E., Sowden, G., & Ashworth, J. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.009 · Cited by 92
Self-citationVowles, K. E., Fink, B. C., & Cohen, L. L. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.04.003 · Cited by 55
Self-citationVowles, K. E., Sowden, G., Hickman, J., & Ashworth, J. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.012 · Cited by 24
Self-citationVulnerability in Clinical Research with Patients in Pain: A Risk Analysis
Tait, R. C. (2009) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00351.x · Cited by 19
Bailey, R. W., Vowles, K. E., Witkiewitz, K. A., Sowden, G., & Ashworth, J. (2016) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.011 · Cited by 12
Self-citationThe Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale: Initial Development and Evaluation of 4 and 8 Item Short Forms
Vowles, K. E., Kruger, E. S., Bailey, R. W., Ashworth, J., Hickman, J., Sowden, G., & McCracken, L. M. (2023) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.001 · Cited by 9
Self-citationVowles, K. E., Witkiewitz, K. A., Clarke, E. W., Schmidt, Z., Borsari, B. E., Edwards, K. A., Korecki, J. R., Moniz-Lewis, D. I. K., Bondzie, J., Mullins, C., et al. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107096 · Cited by 3
Self-citationChronic Pain: Third Wave Case Conceptualizations
Vowles, K. E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11677-3_30
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vowles, K. E., Gross, R. T., & McCracken, L. M.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Venue
- Chronic Pain Management
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2007-07-26
- Pages
- 203-219
- OpenAlex
- W2951145149
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain management, treatment outcome assessment, outcome measurement, behavioral pain treatment, avoidance behavior, treatment effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
