PreprintCited by 26Authorship Attribution and ProfilingTopic ModelingMental Health via Writing

Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representations

Open access
Wegmann, Anna, Schraagen, Marijn, Nguyen, Dong·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Linguistic style is an integral component of language. Recent advances in the development of style representations have increasingly used training objectives from authorship verification (AV): Do two texts have the same author? The assumption underlying the AV training task (same author approximates same writing style) enables self-supervised and, thus, extensive training. However, a good performance on the AV task does not ensure good "general-purpose" style representations. For example, as the same author might typically write about certain topics, representations trained on AV might also encode content information instead of style alone. We introduce a variation of the AV training task that controls for content using conversation or domain labels. We evaluate whether known style dimensions are represented and preferred over content information through an original variation to the recently proposed STEL framework. We find that representations trained by controlling for conversation are better than representations trained with domain or no content control at representing style independent from content.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.04907

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegmann, A., Schraagen, M., & Nguyen, D.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
249-268
OpenAlex
W4223992738
Cited by
25
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (410.19.007, VI.Veni.192.130)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
language style, style representation, authorship verification, content control, self-supervised learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review