Cited by 172Mental Health via WritingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningAuthorship Attribution and Profiling

Quantifying the Language of Schizophrenia in Social Media

Open access
Mitchell, Margaret, Hollingshead, Kristy, Coppersmith, Glen·2015·Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality

Abstract

Analyzing symptoms of schizophrenia has traditionally been challenging given the low prevalence of the condition, affecting around 1% of the U.S. population.We explore potential linguistic markers of schizophrenia using the tweets 1 of self-identified schizophrenia sufferers, and describe several natural language processing (NLP) methods to analyze the language of schizophrenia.We examine how these signals compare with the widelyused LIWC categories for understanding mental health (Pennebaker et al., 2007), and provide preliminary evidence of additional linguistic signals that may aid in identifying and getting help to people suffering from schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/w15-1202

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Elizabeth Hohman, David Marchette, and Glen Copper- smith. 2014. Mental health, economics, and popula- tion in social media. In Proceedings of the Joint Sta- tistical Meetings.
  2. H. Andrew Schwartz, Johannes Eichstaedt, Margaret L. Kern, Gregory Park, Maarten Sap, David Stillwell, Michal Kosinski, and Lyle Ungar. 2014. Towards as- sessing changes in degree of depression through Face- book. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Com- putational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology. The National Institute of Mental Health. 2015. Schizophrenia. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia. [Online; accessed 2015-03-04].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, M., Hollingshead, K., & Coppersmith, G.
Affiliations
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality
Published
2015
Pages
11-20
OpenAlex
W2252128283
Cited by
172
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
FWCI
28.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Keywords
schizophrenia, linguistic markers, social media language, Twitter, LIWC, natural language processing, mental health, symptom detection, help-seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review