Cited by 257Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Exploring gender difference in sleep quality of young adults: Findings from a large population study

Open access
Fatima, Yaqoot, Doi, Suhail A.R., Najman, Jake M., Mamun, Abdullah Al·2016·Clinical Medicine & Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore if gender difference in sleep quality is due to higher prevalence of depression in females, and whether socio-demographic and lifestyle factors have a differential effect on sleep quality in males and females. METHODS: Youth self-reports and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used to assess sleep quality and associated risk factors. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the association between various risk factors and poor sleep quality. RESULTS: Reports from 3,778 young adults (20.6±0.86 years) indicate a higher prevalence of poor sleep quality in females than males (65.1% vs. 49.8%). It seems that gender difference in poor sleep is independent of depression, socio-demographics, and lifestyle factors, since the higher odds of poor sleep quality in females was robust to adjust for depression, socio-demographics, and lifestyle factors (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.23-1.90). Lifestyle factors (eg, smoking) (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.05-3.46) were associated with sleep quality in only males. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that female vulnerability to poor sleep quality should be explored beyond psycho-social disparities. Perhaps, exploring if the female predisposition to poor sleep quality originates at the biological level could lead to the answer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3121/cmr.2016.1338

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are no gender differences in sleep duration for college students.

    “This is consistent with previous research suggesting no gender differences in sleep duration for college students [33].”

    From Relationships Between Physical Activity, Sleep, Psychological Well-Being, and Academic Performance Among Native American College Students (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results report that female participants had longer sleep duration than males, contrary to the claimed absence of a gender difference. The study sampled young adults, not specifically college students; the Results say only a subset attended TAFE/college or university. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385-401.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fatima, Y., Doi, S. A. R., Najman, J. M., & Mamun, A. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mamun, Abdullah Al
Venue
Clinical Medicine & Research
Published
2016-12
Volume
14
Issue
3-4
Pages
138-144
ISSN
  • 1539-4182 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6179
OpenAlex
W2586715040
Cited by
257
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Medicine & Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (519756)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep quality, gender differences, young adults, depression, smoking, lifestyle factors, sociodemographic factors, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, sex differences in sleep
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Social Class, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review