PreprintCited by 57Education during COVID-19 pandemicE-Learning and COVID-19Online Learning and Analytics

Lockdown learning: changes in online study activity and performance of Dutch secondary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
van der Velde, Maarten, Sense, Florian, Spijkers, Rinske, Meeter, Martijn, van Rijn, Hedderik·2021·Frontiers in Education

Preprint — published as 10.3389/feduc.2021.712987

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused lockdowns and sudden school closures around the world in spring 2020, significantly impacting the education of students. Here, we investigate how the switch to distance learning affected study activity and performance in an online retrieval practice tool used for language learning in Dutch secondary education. We report insights from a rich data set consisting of over 116 million retrieval practice trials completed by more than 133 thousand students over the course of two consecutive school years. Our findings show that usage of the tool increased substantially at the start of lockdown, with the bulk of study activity occurring on weekday mornings. In general, students' progress through the material was largely unaffected by lockdown, although students from the highest educational track were somewhat more likely to be on or ahead of schedule than students from lower tracks, compared to the previous year. Performance on individual study trials was generally stable, but accuracy and response time on open answer questions went up, perhaps as a result of students being more focused at home. These encouraging findings contribute to a growing literature on the educational ramifications of distance learning during lockdown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/fr2v8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students increased time using online-learning software at home, were less distracted or experienced less time pressure in home-schooling, or were presented with individualized assignments.

    “Moreover, students increased the time using the online-learning software at home, were less distracted or experienced less time pressure in a home-schooling rather than classroom setting, or were presented with individualized assignments within the online program (see also Meeter, 2021; Spitzer and Musslick, 2021; van der Velde et al., 2021).”

    From Effects of COVID-19-Related School Closures on Student Achievement-A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as van der Velde et al., 2021

    The Discussion reports increased use of the online retrieval-practice tool during lockdown. It says higher accuracy and response times on open-answer questions *perhaps* indicated less time pressure or better focus at home; it does not establish that students were less distracted. The Data Set section describes an adaptive tool, but does not say students were given individualized assignments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • van der Velde et al. (2021) reported an increase in correct solutions on open questions within a French learning program.

    “Similarly, van der Velde et al. (2021) reported an increase in correct solutions on open questions within a French learning program.”

    From Effects of COVID-19-Related School Closures on Student Achievement-A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as van der Velde et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 2015.
  2. P. Engzell, A. Frey, and M. D. Verhagen. Learning Inequality During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Preprint, SocArXiv, Oct. 2020.
  3. A. Kuznetsova, P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 2017.
  4. H. G. van de Werfhorst, E. Kessenich, and S. Geven. The Digital Divide in Online Education. Inequality in Digital Preparedness of Students and Schools before the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Preprint, SocArXiv, Aug. 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Velde, M., Sense, F., Spijkers, R., Meeter, M., & van Rijn, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
6
ISSN
2504-284X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188444373
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9
FWCI
23.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, distance education, online language learning, retrieval practice, high school students, educational tracking, academic progress, reaction time (psychology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review