PreprintCited by 195Education during COVID-19 pandemicParental Involvement in EducationSchool Choice and Performance

Inequality in homeschooling during the Corona crisis in the Netherlands. First results from the LISS Panel.

Open access
Bol, Thijs·2020

Abstract

The outbreak of the Corona virus has led to unprecedented measures in education. From March 16, all schools in the Netherlands are closed, and children must keep up with their schoolwork from home. Parents are expected to take a crucial role in this “homeschooling”: they are primarily responsible for ensuring that their children follow the curriculum. In this article I report the first results of a module in the LISS Panel that was designed to map how parents school their children in primary and secondary education. Data on a nationally representative sample of 1,318 children in primary and secondary education were gathered in April. The results show marked differences between social groups. Whereas all parents find it important that their children keep up with the schoolwork, children from advantaged backgrounds receive much more parental support and have more resources (e.g., own computer) to study from home. Differences in parental support are driven by the ability to help: parents with a higher education degree feels themselves much capable to help their children with schoolwork than lower educated parents. Parents also report that schools provide more extensive distant schooling for children in the academic track in secondary education (vwo) than for children in the pre-vocational track (vmbo). Finally, there is a clear gender gap: parents feel much more capable to support their daughters than their sons.These initial findings provide clear indications that the school shutdown in the Netherlands is likely to have strong effects on the inequality in educational opportunities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31235/osf.io/hf32q

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Survey evidence from lockdown indicates high levels of dissatisfaction with remote learning and considerable disparities in help with schoolwork and learning resources.

    “Despite favorable conditions, survey evidence from lockdown indicates high levels of dissatisfaction with remote learning (38) and considerable disparities in help with schoolwork and learning resources (39).”
  • Lower-educated mothers and fathers feel less sure of themselves in supporting their child, even when their children are still in primary school.

    “Bol (2020) documents a large gap in the extent to which parents feel capable of supporting their child, with lower-educated mothers and fathers feeling less sure of themselves, even when their children are still in primary school.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Bol (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bol, T.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bol, Thijs
Published
2020-04-30
OpenAlex
W3021418304
Cited by
193
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 20
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
homeschooling, COVID-19 school closures, educational inequality, parental support, parental education, social inequality, home learning resources, distance education, K-12 education, LISS panel, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review