Cited by 5Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCOVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Suicidal ideation and suicide commitment in Health Care Workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature

Open access
Buselli, Rodolfo, Corsi, Martina, Veltri, Antonello, Baldanzi, Sigrid, Chiumiento, Martina, Marino, Riccardo, Caldi, Fabrizio, Perretta, Salvio +3 more·2022·International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health

Abstract

Introduction: Suicide represents an important public health concern since it leads to more annual deaths globally than violence, war and natural disasters combined. It is evident that during this pandemic year the phenomenon acquires even greater importance especially in the categories at risk, such as health care workers (HCWs). The aim of this review is to analyze literature evidence regarding health care providers' suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide commitment during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: International databases and digital worldwide media reports were screened between March 2020 and March 2021. The authors conducted a systematic review and described evidence using a narrative approach with some focus points based on the PICO framework. Inclusion or exclusion of literature is done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Results: What emerged is a range of SI that varies from 4 to 8% and the main risk factors seem to be loneliness, not having children and personal history of mental disorders. Conclusion: SI, and in worst cases suicide commitment, seem mental health outcomes not to be underestimated, especially in an emergency that is protracting. They require monitoring by health surveillance systems with a goal of prevention and support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3126/ijosh.v12i2.40500

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies evaluating the use of alcohol by health care professionals are scarce, and data on this matter are often underestimated owing to the tendency to disregard the problem.

    “Nevertheless, studies evaluating the use of alcohol by health care professionals are scarce, and there are often underestimated data on this matter owing to the tendency to disregard the problem, caused by the fear of consequences in the work sphere and professional status [6, 8, 16, 17].”

    From A Medical Resident with a History of Alcohol Abuse and Suicidal Ideation: A Challenge for Both Psychiatry and Occupational Medicine in the Context of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion says healthcare workers may underestimate mental-health symptoms and that studies of suicidal ideation are few; it also discusses alcohol use as a suicide risk factor. It does not say that studies of healthcare professionals’ alcohol use are scarce or that alcohol-use data are underestimated because professionals disregard the problem. Searches for alcohol-use studies, underreporting, and professional consequences found no passage addressing those points; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reger MA, Piccirillo ML, Buchman-Schmitt JM. COVID-19, Mental Health, and Suicide Risk Among Health Care Workers: Looking Beyond the Crisis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 4;81(5):20com13381. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20com13381. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buselli, R., Corsi, M., Veltri, A., Baldanzi, S., Chiumiento, M., Marino, R., Caldi, F., Perretta, S., Foddis, R., Cristaudo, A., & Guglielmi, G.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health
Published
2022-03-13
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
117-124
ISSN
  • 2091-0878 (ISSN-L)
  • 2738-9707
OpenAlex
W4220757834
Cited by
5
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
suicidal ideation, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, workplace mental health, loneliness, childlessness, history of mental illness, suicide risk factors, suicide prevention, health surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review