Cited by 198Research, Science, and AcademiaInnovation Policy and R&Dscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change?

Lepori, Benedetto, van den Besselaar, Peter, Dinges, Michael, Potì, Bianca, Reale, Emanuela, Slipersæter, Stig, Thèves, Jean, van der Meulen, Barend·2007·Science and Public Policy

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the evolution of national research policies during the past three decades in six European countries (Austria, Italy, France, Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland), with a special focus on the changes of public project funding schemes. It systematically uses indicators on the volume of funding attributed by each instrument and agency, which have been developed in a project of the European network of excellence PRIME. A common model is identified in these countries, where project funding is the second main channel of public funding of research, but also there are considerable variations among them in the share of instruments and agencies, and in beneficiaries. There are three interesting commonalities: a strong increase of project funding volumes; a differentiation of instruments; and a general shift towards instruments oriented to thematic priorities. They also show that individual countries appear to follow quite distinct paths in the organisation setting of funding agencies, and that national differences in funding portfolios persist through time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3152/030234207x234578

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lepori, B., van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., Potì, B., Reale, E., Slipersæter, S., Thèves, J., & van der Meulen, B.
Affiliations
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • Joanneum Research (AT)
  • Istituto di Ricerca sulla Crescita Economica Sostenibile (IT)
  • Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NO)
  • Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (FR)
Corresponding author
Lepori, Benedetto
Venue
Science and Public Policy
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
372-388
ISSN
  • 0302-3427 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-5430
OpenAlex
W2024607732
Cited by
198
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
national science policy, research funding, research funding mechanisms, research funding agencies, thematic priorities, European countries, Austria, Italy, France, Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review