The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of reducing enteric methane production from dairy cows by incorporating into the diet various sources of long-chain FA varying in their degree of saturation and ruminal availability. The experiment was conducted as a crossover design with 16 lactating dairy cows maintained in 2 groups and fed 4 dietary treatments in four 28-d periods. Eight ruminally cannulated primiparous cows (96 +/- 18 d in milk) were assigned to group 1 and 8 multiparous cows (130 +/- 31 d in milk) were assigned to group 2. The dietary treatments were: 1) a commercial source of calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids (CTL), 2) crushed sunflower seeds (SS), 3) crushed flaxseed (FS), and 4) crushed canola seed (CS). The oilseeds added 3.1 to 4.2% fat to the diet (DM basis). All 3 oilseed treatments decreased methane production (g/d) by an average of 13%. When corrected for differences in dry matter intake (DMI), compared with CTL, methane production (g/kg of DM intake) was decreased by feeding FS (-18%) or CS (-16%) and was only numerically decreased (-10%) by feeding SS. However, compared with the CTL, feeding SS or FS lowered digestible DMI by 16 and 9%, respectively, because of lowered digestibility. Thus, only CS lowered methane per unit of digestible DM intake. Feeding SS and CS decreased rumen protozoal counts, but there were no treatment effects on mean ruminal pH or total volatile fatty acid concentration. Milk efficiency (3.5% fat corrected milk/DMI), milk yield, and component yield and concentrations were not affected by oilseed treatments. The study shows that adding sources of long-chain fatty acids to the diet in the form of processed oilseeds can be an effective means of reducing methane emissions. However, for some oilseeds such as SS or FS, the reduction in methane can be at the expense of diet digestibility. The use of crushed CS offers a means of mitigating methane without negatively affecting diet digestibility, and hence, milk production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of
(1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50052a726 · Cited by 59,330
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche.
Elizondo-Salazar, J. A. (2014) · Agronomía Mesoamericana · doi:10.15517/am.v13i1.13244 · Cited by 6,497
Guide to the care and use of experimental animals
Olfert, E. D. (1993) · Cited by 3,184
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714 · cited 4×
“In agreement with Johnson and Johnson (1995), Woodward et al. (2006) did a stoichiometric calculation showing that the biohydrogenation of flaxseed oil would only reduce enteric CH4 by about 13 g/d (or about 5% of the CH4 emissions).”
InfluentialOptimal Diets for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
Hu, F. B. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.20.2569 · Cited by 1,503
Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
Beauchemin, K. A., Kreuzer, M., O'Mara, F., & McAllister, T. A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07199 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationOGIMOTO, K., & Soichi, I. M. A. I. (1981) · Cited by 626
Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review
Boadi, D., Benchaar, C., Chiquette, J., & Massé, D. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a03-109 · Cited by 518
Self-citationCochran, R. C., Adams, D. C., Wallace, J. D., & Galyean, M. L. (1986) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1986.6351476x · Cited by 504
Cited by
Knapp, J. R., Laur, G. L., Vadas, P. A., Weiss, W. P., & Tricarico, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7234 · Cited by 1,002
Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale
Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P., & Doreau, M. (2010) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109990620 · Cited by 886
Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants
Morgavi, D. P., Forano, E., Martin, C., & Newbold, C. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731110000546 · Cited by 694
Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances
Patra, A., Park, T., Kim, M., & Yu, Z. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0145-9 · Cited by 466
Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production?
Grainger, C., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.021 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Benchaar, C., & Holtshausen, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2118-2127
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078695904
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 34.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.2008-1903
- The paper
- Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Benchaar, C., & Holtshausen, L. (2009). Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.