Cited by 297Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnimal health and immunologyProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics

Open access
Timmerman, H.M., Mulder, L., Everts, H., van Espen, D.C., van der Wal, E., Klaassen, G., Rouwers, S.M.G., Hartemink, R. +2 more·2005·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Four experiments with 1-wk-old veal calves were conducted to assess the influence of probiotics on growth and health indicators. In experiments 1 and 2, the liquid probiotic supplements were administered daily from experimental d 1 to 15. The treatment period in experiments 3 and 4 was extended to 56 d. The probiotics used were a multispecies probiotic (MSPB) containing different probiotic species of human origin, or a calf-specific probiotic (CSPB) containing 6 Lactobacillus species isolated from calf feces and selected on the basis of a combination of characteristics. When the data for the 4 experiments were pooled, the probiotics enhanced growth rate during the first 2 wk. During the 8-wk experimental period, average daily gain and feed efficiency were significantly improved in the probiotic-treated groups. The MSPB-induced increase in weight gain was greater when the control calves were considered less healthy based on a health score (an index of diarrhea and therapeutic treatments). Probiotic treatment tended to diminish mortality. The CSPB treatment reduced the incidence of diarrhea and the fecal counts of coliforms. When therapeutic treatment was intensive in the control calves, the ingestion of probiotics reduced the percentage of calves that required therapy and the amount of treatments needed against digestive or respiratory diseases. There was no clear difference in the efficiency of the MSPB and CSPB preparations. Further research is necessary to identify underlying mechanisms and to evaluate the potential of probiotics to improve respiratory health in veal calf production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72891-5

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS User's Guide, Statistics, version 8, vol. 1, 2, and 3. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timmerman, H. M., Mulder, L., Everts, H., van Espen, D. C., van der Wal, E., Klaassen, G., Rouwers, S. M. G., Hartemink, R., Rombouts, F. M., & Beynen, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Winclove Probiotics (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Timmerman, H.M.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2005-06
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
2154-2165
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167217306
Cited by
297
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
veal calves, probiotics, milk replacer, calf growth, calf health, Lactobacillus, multispecies probiotics, diarrhea, coliform bacteria, feed efficiency, mortality, respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal diseases
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Diet, Digestive System Diseases, Enterobacteriaceae, Feces, Fermentation, Health Status, Lactobacillus, Milk, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Colony Count, Microbial, Weight Gain, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review