Cited by 584Agricultural Engineering and MechanizationRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Simple Method for the Analysis of Particle Sizes of Forage and Total Mixed Rations

Open access
Lammers, B.P., Buckmaster, D.R., Heinrichs, A.J.·1996·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

A simple separator was developed to determine the particle sizes of forage and TMR that allows for easy separation of wet forage into three fractions and also allows plotting of the particle size distribution. The device was designed to mimic the laboratory-scale separator for forage particle sizes that was specified by Standard S424 of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. A comparison of results using the standard device and the newly developed separator indicated no difference in ability to predict fractions of particles with maximum length of less than 8 and 19 mm. The separator requires a small quantity of sample (1.4 L) and is manually operated. The materials on the screens and bottom pan were weighed to obtain the cumulative percentage of sample that was undersize for the two fractions. The results were then plotted using the Weibull distribution, which proved to be the best fit for the data. Convenience samples of haycrop silage, corn silage, and TMR from farms in the northeastern US were analyzed using the forage and TMR separator, and the range of observed values are given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76442-1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–584 of 584

Metadata

Authors
Lammers, B. P., Buckmaster, D. R., & Heinrichs, A. J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1996-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
922-928
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152106564
Cited by
582
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
forage particle size, total mixed ration, particle size distribution, Weibull distribution, corn silage, dairy cattle nutrition, particle size fractions
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Cattle, Zea mays, Dairying, Female, Particle Size, Silage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review