Cited by 42Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesRadiology practices and educationPolyomavirus and related diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of Radiologically Isolated Syndrome: A Population-Based Study

Open access
Forslin, Y., Granberg, T., Jumah, A. Antwan, Shams, S., Aspelin, P., Kristoffersen-Wiberg, M., Martola, J., Fredrikson, S.·2016·American Journal of Neuroradiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incidental MR imaging findings resembling MS in asymptomatic individuals, fulfilling the Okuda criteria, are termed "radiologically isolated syndrome." Those with radiologically isolated syndrome are at high risk of their condition converting to MS. The epidemiology of radiologically isolated syndrome remains largely unknown, and there are no population-based studies, to our knowledge. Our aim was to study the population-based incidence of radiologically isolated syndrome in a high-incidence region for MS and to evaluate the effect on radiologically isolated syndrome incidence when revising the original radiologically isolated syndrome criteria by using the latest radiologic classification for dissemination in space. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 2272 brain MR imaging scans in 1907 persons obtained during 2013 in the Swedish county of Västmanland, with a population of 259,000 inhabitants, were blindly evaluated by a senior radiologist and a senior neuroradiologist. The Okuda criteria for radiologically isolated syndrome were applied by using both the Barkhof and Swanton classifications for dissemination in space. Assessments of clinical data were performed by a radiology resident and a senior neurologist. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of radiologically isolated syndrome was 2 patients (0.1%), equaling an incidence rate of 0.8 cases per 100,000 person-years, in a region with an incidence rate of MS of 10.2 cases per 100,000 person-years. There was no difference in the radiologically isolated syndrome incidence rate when applying a modified version of the Okuda criteria by using the newer Swanton classification for dissemination in space. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologically isolated syndrome is uncommon in a high-incidence region for MS. Adapting the Okuda criteria to use the dissemination in space-Swanton classification may be feasible. Future studies on radiologically isolated syndrome may benefit from a collaborative approach to ensure adequate numbers of participants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3174/ajnr.a4660

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RIS incidence is increased in healthy relatives of patients with MS.

    “but increased in healthy relatives of patients with MS. 85”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Discussion reports RIS in 3% or 10% of relatives of patients with MS, compared with 2.4% or 3.7% of healthy volunteers, depending on the criteria used. These are frequencies in selected groups, not incidence rates in relatives, so the claim’s use of “incidence” is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. OECDiLibrary. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams, total per 1000 population. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/table/mri-exam-total-table-2014-1-en. Accessed June 18, 2014.
  2. 10.1136/bmj.b3016 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335764.14513.1a · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1177/1352458512451943 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1352458510375707 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019452 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318238ee9b · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824528c9 · DOI
  10. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318295d707 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.108274 · DOI
  12. Derwenskus, 2007, Clinically silent multiple sclerosis: description of a patient cohort without symptoms typical of MS but abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging, Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 3, 1226
  13. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.119 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1177/1352458509106214 · DOI
  15. 10.1590/S0004-282X2012000100003 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003531 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050080033003 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03811.x · DOI
  19. Johannsen, 1996, Clinically unexpected multiple sclerosis in patients with mental disorders: a series of 7301 psychiatric autopsies, Acta Neurol Belg, 96, 62
  20. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.180000 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108599 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1352458511403794 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
  24. 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.3174/ajnr.A3653 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/1352458512471874 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wasay, 2006, MS in Asian countries, Int MS J, 13, 58
  28. 10.1177/1352458506072339 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1352458512462268 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1352458512462075 · DOI
  31. Okuda, 2015, Multi-center, randomized, double-blinded assessment of dimethyl fumarate in extending the time to a first attack in radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) (ARISE Trial) (P7.207), Neurology, 84, P7.207, 10.1212/WNL.84.14_supplement.P7.207 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Forslin, Y., Granberg, T., Jumah, A. A., Shams, S., Aspelin, P., Kristoffersen-Wiberg, M., Martola, J., & Fredrikson, S.
Affiliations
  • Västmanlands sjukhus Västerås (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2016-02-04
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1022
ISSN
  • 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-959X
OpenAlex
W2331244886
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet (20120213, ALF grant 20120213)
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting (20120213)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
radiologically isolated syndrome, multiple sclerosis, incidence, dissemination in space, incidental MRI findings, conversion to multiple sclerosis, diagnostic criteria revision
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Syndrome, Incidence, Disease Progression, Incidental Findings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review